The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 31636, Lake Park, Georgia is 38 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 78.90 percent of the residents in 31636 has some form of health insurance. 34.73 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 57.57 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 31636 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 2,639 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 31636. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,639 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,786 health care providers accessible to residents in 31636, Lake Park, Georgia.
Health Scores in 31636, Lake Park, Georgia
Hypertension Score | 10 |
---|---|
People Score | 28 |
Provider Score | 38 |
Hospital Score | 20 |
Travel Score | 32 |
31636 | Lake Park | Georgia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis below provides an assessment of hypertension care within ZIP code 31636, focusing on Lake Park, Georgia, and evaluating the available primary care resources. This evaluation considers several key factors, including physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the integration of telemedicine, and the accessibility of mental health services, all crucial elements in managing hypertension effectively.
Lake Park, a small community, presents unique challenges and opportunities when it comes to healthcare access. The first step in assessing hypertension care is understanding the physician-to-patient ratio. A low ratio, indicating a shortage of primary care physicians, can significantly hinder access to regular check-ups, medication management, and patient education, all vital components of hypertension control. Data from the U.S. Census Bureau, combined with information from the Georgia Composite Medical Board and other sources, is essential to determine the precise ratio in this area. This data will allow for a comparison to state and national averages, offering a baseline for understanding the local healthcare landscape. The analysis must identify the number of primary care physicians actively practicing within the ZIP code and estimate the population they serve.
Beyond the raw numbers, the quality of care is paramount. Identifying “standout practices” requires a deeper dive into the practices themselves. This involves examining factors like patient satisfaction scores (available through surveys and online reviews), the adoption of evidence-based guidelines for hypertension management, the use of electronic health records (EHRs) for efficient data tracking, and the availability of specialized services like registered dietitians or certified diabetes educators. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to patient-centered care, preventative measures, and comprehensive hypertension management strategies would be considered high-performing. Investigating the types of insurance accepted by each practice is also important, as this can impact accessibility for different patient populations.
Telemedicine has emerged as a valuable tool in healthcare, particularly for managing chronic conditions like hypertension. The analysis must assess the extent of telemedicine adoption among primary care practices in Lake Park. This includes evaluating the availability of virtual consultations, remote blood pressure monitoring programs, and digital patient education resources. Practices that embrace telemedicine can improve patient convenience, enhance medication adherence, and provide timely interventions, especially for patients with mobility limitations or those living in remote areas. The presence of telehealth options can significantly impact the overall hypertension score.
The link between mental health and hypertension is well-established. Stress, anxiety, and depression can contribute to elevated blood pressure and hinder effective management. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources is a critical component of a comprehensive hypertension care plan. The analysis should identify the presence of mental health professionals (psychiatrists, psychologists, therapists, counselors) in the area and assess their integration with primary care practices. This includes exploring the availability of integrated behavioral health services, where mental health professionals work collaboratively with primary care physicians to address both physical and mental health needs. The ability to access mental health support is an essential factor in achieving optimal blood pressure control.
Specific practices within ZIP code 31636 will be evaluated based on these criteria. For example, a practice that has a high physician-to-patient ratio, consistently positive patient reviews, a robust telemedicine program, and integrated behavioral health services would receive a higher score. Conversely, a practice with a lower physician-to-patient ratio, limited telemedicine capabilities, and a lack of mental health integration would receive a lower score. Each practice's score will be based on a weighted average of these factors, reflecting their relative importance in providing effective hypertension care.
The overall “Hypertension Score” for Lake Park will be a composite score reflecting the average performance of the primary care practices in the area, weighted by factors such as the population served by each practice. This score will provide a snapshot of the overall quality and accessibility of hypertension care in the community. This score will consider all of the above factors and offer a comprehensive view of the care available.
The analysis should also identify any gaps or areas for improvement. This might include a shortage of primary care physicians, a lack of telemedicine adoption, or limited access to mental health services. Identifying these gaps can inform strategies to improve hypertension care in the community. This could include efforts to recruit more primary care physicians, promote the adoption of telemedicine, and expand access to mental health services.
The final report should provide a clear and concise summary of the findings, including the “Hypertension Score” for Lake Park, the ranking of individual practices, and recommendations for improvement. The analysis should also highlight any standout practices that are demonstrating excellence in hypertension care. The report should be easy to understand and provide actionable insights for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers.
The analysis must be conducted with the utmost care and attention to detail, utilizing reliable data sources and employing rigorous analytical methods. The goal is to provide an accurate and objective assessment of hypertension care in Lake Park, enabling informed decision-making and ultimately improving the health and well-being of the community. The report should be updated periodically to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape and track progress in improving hypertension care.
The final product will be a valuable resource for anyone seeking to understand the quality and accessibility of hypertension care in Lake Park, Georgia. It will provide a comprehensive assessment of the current state of affairs, identify areas for improvement, and highlight best practices. This information can be used by patients to make informed decisions about their healthcare, by healthcare providers to improve their services, and by policymakers to develop strategies to enhance hypertension care in the community.
For a detailed visual representation of the data and the geographical distribution of healthcare resources, explore the power of CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps provide a dynamic and insightful view of the healthcare landscape, allowing for a deeper understanding of access and availability.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like