42332, Cleaton, Kentucky Hypertension Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 42332, Cleaton, Kentucky is 23 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 90.30 percent of the residents in 42332 has some form of health insurance. 84.33 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 17.16 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 42332 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 19 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 42332. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 13 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,299 health care providers accessible to residents in 42332, Cleaton, Kentucky.

The following analysis assesses hypertension management capabilities within ZIP code 42332, focusing on primary care availability in Cleaton, Kentucky. This evaluation considers physician-to-patient ratios, notable medical practices, telemedicine integration, and the availability of mental health resources, all crucial elements in effective hypertension control.

The physician-to-patient ratio in Cleaton, and more broadly within the 42332 ZIP code, is a critical starting point. A low ratio, indicating fewer physicians relative to the population, can lead to appointment delays, reduced patient access, and potential gaps in preventative care, including hypertension screening and management. Publicly available data from sources like the Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure, combined with U.S. Census Bureau population estimates, provides the foundation for this calculation. The analysis needs to ascertain the number of practicing primary care physicians (PCPs) within the specified geographic area and compare this number to the estimated population. A ratio exceeding 1:1000, for example, might signal a potential shortage, while a ratio below 1:500 could suggest better access. The specific ratio, when determined, will significantly influence the overall 'Hypertension Score.'

Identifying standout practices within Cleaton and the surrounding area is essential. These practices may demonstrate superior hypertension management through various means. This includes adherence to established guidelines from organizations like the American Heart Association (AHA) and the American College of Cardiology (ACC). The analysis will evaluate practices based on criteria such as the use of electronic health records (EHRs) for tracking patient data, the implementation of standardized protocols for blood pressure monitoring and medication management, and the provision of patient education materials. Furthermore, practices that actively engage in population health initiatives, such as targeted outreach programs for patients with uncontrolled hypertension, will receive higher scores. The presence of certified hypertension specialists or practices with a strong track record of achieving blood pressure control targets will also be considered.

Telemedicine adoption represents another key factor. The ability to offer virtual consultations, remote blood pressure monitoring, and medication management via telehealth platforms enhances patient access, particularly for those with mobility limitations or transportation challenges. Practices that have embraced telemedicine, integrating it seamlessly into their workflow, will score favorably. The analysis will examine the types of telemedicine services offered (e.g., video visits, remote monitoring), the ease of access for patients, and the integration of telemedicine data with the practice’s EHR system. Practices that offer patient portals for secure communication and medication refills also contribute positively to the score.

The integration of mental health resources is crucial in hypertension management. Stress, anxiety, and depression are known contributors to elevated blood pressure. Primary care practices that recognize this connection and provide access to mental health services, either internally or through referrals, will receive a higher score. This includes the availability of on-site therapists, partnerships with mental health providers, and the implementation of screening tools for mental health conditions. Practices that address the social determinants of health, such as food insecurity and lack of access to exercise facilities, will also be favorably assessed.

The 'Hypertension Score' will be a composite metric, reflecting the weighted average of these factors. Each factor (physician-to-patient ratio, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources) will be assigned a specific weight based on its relative importance in hypertension management. The analysis will then assign a numerical score to each factor for each practice or area, based on the criteria outlined above. The overall 'Hypertension Score' will be calculated by multiplying each factor's score by its weight and summing the results. This final score will provide a comprehensive assessment of hypertension management capabilities within the 42332 ZIP code and Cleaton.

The analysis of physician-to-patient ratios will involve careful data collection and interpretation. Publicly available data may need to be supplemented with information gathered through direct outreach to medical practices. This may involve contacting practices to inquire about their patient volume, appointment availability, and the types of services they offer. The accuracy of the physician-to-patient ratio is paramount, as it directly impacts the assessment of access to care.

The evaluation of standout practices will involve a review of publicly available information, such as practice websites, online reviews, and quality reports. The analysis may also involve contacting practices directly to gather information about their hypertension management protocols, patient education programs, and telemedicine offerings. The goal is to identify practices that are demonstrably committed to providing high-quality, patient-centered care.

The assessment of telemedicine adoption will involve evaluating the types of telemedicine services offered, the ease of access for patients, and the integration of telemedicine data with the practice’s EHR system. Practices that have embraced telemedicine, integrating it seamlessly into their workflow, will score favorably. The analysis will consider factors such as the availability of video visits, remote blood pressure monitoring, and patient portals for secure communication.

The integration of mental health resources is crucial in hypertension management. Practices that provide access to mental health services, either internally or through referrals, will receive a higher score. This includes the availability of on-site therapists, partnerships with mental health providers, and the implementation of screening tools for mental health conditions. Practices that address the social determinants of health, such as food insecurity and lack of access to exercise facilities, will also be favorably assessed.

The final 'Hypertension Score' will be presented in a clear and concise format, providing a valuable tool for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers. The score will highlight areas of strength and weakness in hypertension management within the 42332 ZIP code and Cleaton, informing efforts to improve patient outcomes. The analysis will also provide specific recommendations for improvement, such as increasing the number of primary care physicians, promoting telemedicine adoption, and expanding access to mental health services.

For a dynamic and visually compelling representation of this data, including the geographic distribution of resources and patient outcomes, explore the power of CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can transform this data into interactive visualizations, revealing patterns and insights that are difficult to discern from static reports.