The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 01521, Holland, Massachusetts is 40 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 97.03 percent of the residents in 01521 has some form of health insurance. 42.69 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 74.60 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 01521 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 523 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 01521. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 536 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 654 health care providers accessible to residents in 01521, Holland, Massachusetts.
Health Scores in 01521, Holland, Massachusetts
Hypertension Score | 61 |
---|---|
People Score | 71 |
Provider Score | 40 |
Hospital Score | 39 |
Travel Score | 57 |
01521 | Holland | Massachusetts | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Hypertension Score Analysis: Holland, MA (ZIP Code 01521)
Analyzing healthcare accessibility and quality within Holland, Massachusetts (ZIP Code 01521), requires a multifaceted approach, especially when focusing on hypertension management. This analysis will delve into the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs), physician-to-patient ratios, the adoption of telemedicine, the presence of mental health resources, and identify potential standout practices. The goal is to provide a comprehensive “Hypertension Score” assessment, considering the critical role these factors play in effective hypertension control.
The foundation of hypertension management rests on accessible and readily available primary care. In Holland, the geographical isolation and potential for a relatively older demographic necessitate a close examination of PCP availability. Determining the exact number of PCPs practicing within the ZIP code is the crucial first step. Publicly available databases, insurance provider directories, and local hospital affiliations provide the necessary data. After collecting this data, the next step is determining the population of Holland. Dividing the population by the number of PCPs yields the physician-to-patient ratio. A higher ratio indicates a potential strain on the healthcare system, making it more difficult for patients to schedule appointments and receive timely care.
Beyond the raw numbers, the quality of primary care is paramount. Identifying standout practices involves evaluating factors like patient reviews, the presence of board-certified physicians, and the adoption of evidence-based practices for hypertension management. Practices that utilize electronic health records (EHRs) effectively, offering patient portals for communication and medication management, generally score higher. Furthermore, practices actively participating in quality improvement initiatives, such as those focused on blood pressure control, demonstrate a commitment to optimal patient outcomes. Investigating the availability of on-site diagnostic tools, such as ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), further enhances the assessment.
Telemedicine has become increasingly relevant, especially in rural areas. Its adoption offers the potential to bridge geographical barriers, increasing access to care. Assessing the extent of telemedicine implementation in Holland's primary care practices is crucial. Do physicians offer virtual consultations for follow-up appointments, medication refills, or blood pressure monitoring guidance? The availability of remote patient monitoring (RPM) technologies, allowing for continuous blood pressure tracking and data transmission, also significantly impacts the Hypertension Score. Practices embracing telemedicine and RPM demonstrate a forward-thinking approach, improving patient convenience and potentially improving outcomes.
Hypertension often coexists with mental health conditions like anxiety and depression, which can negatively impact blood pressure control. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources is a crucial component of the Hypertension Score. Assessing the presence of mental health professionals within the primary care practices, or within close proximity, is vital. Do practices offer integrated behavioral health services, such as counseling or psychiatric consultations? Collaboration between PCPs and mental health providers is essential for holistic patient care. Investigating the availability of educational resources and support groups for patients with hypertension and related mental health concerns also adds value.
The assessment of the Hypertension Score for Holland, MA, requires a nuanced approach. The score is not simply a numerical rating, but a composite of various factors. The physician-to-patient ratio forms the foundation, reflecting the overall accessibility of care. The quality of primary care, encompassing physician qualifications, EHR utilization, and adherence to best practices, significantly impacts the score. Telemedicine adoption enhances accessibility and convenience, while the presence of mental health resources contributes to holistic patient care. Each of these elements is weighted based on its relative importance in hypertension management.
To further refine the analysis, consider the following: the average wait times for appointments, the availability of after-hours care, and the insurance plans accepted by local practices. The socioeconomic demographics of the population also play a role. Areas with higher rates of poverty or limited access to healthy food options may face greater challenges in hypertension control. Incorporating this data into the score provides a more comprehensive understanding of the challenges and opportunities within Holland.
The final Hypertension Score for Holland would be presented as a rating, reflecting the overall quality and accessibility of hypertension care. This rating could be accompanied by a detailed report outlining the specific strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system. This report should identify areas for improvement and highlight best practices. For example, practices with strong telemedicine programs or integrated mental health services could serve as models for others.
This comprehensive analysis offers a valuable tool for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers. Patients can use the information to make informed decisions about their healthcare. Providers can use the data to identify areas for improvement and to benchmark their performance against their peers. Policymakers can use the information to allocate resources effectively and to develop programs that improve access to care and patient outcomes.
For a visual representation of these factors and their geographic distribution, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome provides interactive maps that can illustrate physician locations, practice locations, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resource availability. This visual approach allows for a more intuitive understanding of the healthcare landscape in Holland, MA, and its impact on hypertension management.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like