The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 01612, Paxton, Massachusetts is 95 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 99.08 percent of the residents in 01612 has some form of health insurance. 22.42 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 91.77 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 01612 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,077 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 01612. An estimate of 2 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 807 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,486 health care providers accessible to residents in 01612, Paxton, Massachusetts.
Health Scores in 01612, Paxton, Massachusetts
| Hypertension Score | 83 |
|---|---|
| People Score | 51 |
| Provider Score | 95 |
| Hospital Score | 39 |
| Travel Score | 60 |
| 01612 | Paxton | Massachusetts | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Hypertension Score Analysis: 01612 Doctors & Paxton Primary Care
Analyzing healthcare access and quality, especially regarding hypertension management, requires a multi-faceted approach. This analysis focuses on the medical landscape within ZIP code 01612 (Worcester, Massachusetts) and the availability of primary care in the neighboring town of Paxton, assessing factors crucial for effective hypertension control. We will evaluate physician-to-patient ratios, highlight exemplary practices, examine telemedicine adoption, and consider the integration of mental health resources, ultimately providing a comprehensive ‘Hypertension Score’ perspective.
The foundation of effective hypertension management rests on readily available primary care. Within 01612, the density of primary care physicians (PCPs) is a critical factor. A lower physician-to-patient ratio indicates potentially better access to care, enabling more frequent check-ups, proactive screenings, and personalized treatment plans. However, raw numbers alone are insufficient. The age and specialization of physicians, their acceptance of new patients, and their affiliations with larger healthcare systems all contribute to the accessibility equation. Examining the distribution of PCPs within the ZIP code, identifying underserved areas, and understanding the patient demographics they serve are vital.
Paxton, a smaller community, faces different challenges. While it might have fewer PCPs, its proximity to Worcester offers potential solutions. The ease of travel to 01612 for appointments, the availability of transportation assistance programs, and the integration of Paxton residents into the Worcester healthcare network are crucial considerations. The ‘Hypertension Score’ in this context should consider the efficiency of referral systems, the coordination of care between Paxton residents and Worcester-based specialists, and the overall patient experience.
Several primary care practices within 01612 likely stand out in their approach to hypertension management. Identifying these practices requires scrutinizing their patient outcomes, their adherence to evidence-based guidelines, and their patient satisfaction ratings. Practices that prioritize regular blood pressure monitoring, offer patient education on lifestyle modifications (diet, exercise, stress management), and provide access to medication management programs are likely to achieve superior results. Data from insurance providers, patient reviews, and publicly available quality metrics should be analyzed to identify these high-performing practices.
Telemedicine has emerged as a powerful tool for hypertension management, particularly in expanding access to care and improving patient adherence. Practices that have successfully integrated telemedicine into their workflows deserve recognition. This includes offering virtual consultations for medication adjustments, providing remote blood pressure monitoring devices, and utilizing telehealth platforms for patient education and follow-up appointments. The ‘Hypertension Score’ should reflect the availability and utilization of telemedicine services within 01612, considering factors such as patient adoption rates, the technical infrastructure of practices, and the reimbursement policies of insurance providers.
The link between mental health and hypertension is undeniable. Chronic stress, anxiety, and depression can significantly impact blood pressure control. Therefore, the integration of mental health resources into primary care practices is a critical component of a high ‘Hypertension Score’. Practices that offer on-site mental health services, have established referral pathways to mental health specialists, or provide educational materials on stress management and coping mechanisms deserve high marks. The ‘Hypertension Score’ should evaluate the availability of these resources, the level of collaboration between primary care physicians and mental health professionals, and the overall emphasis on patient well-being.
Beyond individual practices, the broader healthcare ecosystem within 01612 and the surrounding areas influences hypertension management. The availability of specialized services, such as cardiology and nephrology, is essential for patients with complex cases. The presence of community health centers, pharmacies, and support groups also plays a role in providing comprehensive care. The ‘Hypertension Score’ should consider the accessibility of these resources, the level of coordination between different healthcare providers, and the overall strength of the healthcare infrastructure.
In assessing primary care availability in Paxton, the ‘Hypertension Score’ must consider the unique challenges faced by a smaller community. The distance to specialized services in Worcester, the availability of transportation, and the coordination of care between Paxton residents and Worcester-based providers are critical factors. The score should reflect the efficiency of referral systems, the communication between primary care physicians and specialists, and the overall patient experience.
The ‘Hypertension Score’ is not merely a numerical ranking; it's a holistic assessment of the healthcare landscape. It requires a deep dive into data, a critical analysis of practices, and a consideration of the unique challenges and opportunities within each community. The score should be dynamic, reflecting changes in healthcare practices, technological advancements, and evolving patient needs.
To gain a more granular understanding of the healthcare landscape within 01612 and Paxton, including physician locations, practice specializations, and access to resources, you can utilize advanced mapping tools.
**Call to Action:**
For a detailed, visually informative analysis of the healthcare landscape in 01612 and Paxton, consider exploring the interactive mapping capabilities of CartoChrome maps. Visualize physician density, identify areas with limited access, and gain valuable insights to improve hypertension management.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like