02093, Wrentham, Massachusetts Hypertension Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 02093, Wrentham, Massachusetts is 68 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 97.11 percent of the residents in 02093 has some form of health insurance. 24.44 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 85.06 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 02093 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 2,670 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 02093. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,939 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,809 health care providers accessible to residents in 02093, Wrentham, Massachusetts.

The analysis below assesses the landscape of hypertension management within Wrentham, Massachusetts (ZIP Code 02093), focusing on the availability and quality of primary care services. This analysis considers several key metrics, including physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health resources, all factors influencing the effectiveness of hypertension control. The aim is to provide a nuanced understanding of the healthcare environment in this specific area.

Wrentham, a suburban community, faces the typical challenges of healthcare access and delivery. The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical indicator. A higher ratio, meaning fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and potentially compromised care. Data from reliable sources, such as the Massachusetts Medical Society and the U.S. Census Bureau, must be consulted to determine the precise physician-to-patient ratio within 02093. This ratio provides a baseline understanding of the accessibility of primary care services.

Identifying standout practices is crucial. These are clinics or individual physicians who demonstrate excellence in hypertension management. This can be gauged by examining factors such as the percentage of patients achieving blood pressure control, the utilization of evidence-based guidelines, and patient satisfaction scores. Practices that proactively engage in patient education, provide comprehensive follow-up care, and integrate technology to support patient monitoring should be recognized. Publicly available data from sources like the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) and patient reviews on platforms like Healthgrades can offer valuable insights.

The adoption of telemedicine has become increasingly important, especially in the context of chronic disease management. Telemedicine allows for remote monitoring of blood pressure, virtual consultations, and medication management, potentially improving patient adherence and outcomes. Practices that have embraced telemedicine, offering virtual appointments and remote monitoring tools, are likely to be better positioned to serve patients with hypertension. Assessing the availability of telemedicine services requires direct inquiries with local primary care providers.

Mental health is inextricably linked to hypertension management. Stress, anxiety, and depression can significantly impact blood pressure control. Practices that integrate mental health resources into their care models are better equipped to address the holistic needs of patients. This includes having on-site mental health professionals, establishing referral pathways to mental health specialists, and screening patients for mental health conditions. The presence of these resources is a key indicator of a practice’s commitment to comprehensive care.

The evaluation of these factors allows for the creation of a “Hypertension Score” for each practice within 02093. This score would be a composite measure, weighting each of the aforementioned criteria based on their relative importance. The physician-to-patient ratio would serve as a baseline, with lower ratios (indicating better access) contributing to a higher score. Standout practices, based on their performance metrics and patient reviews, would receive higher scores. Practices with robust telemedicine programs would also score favorably. Finally, the integration of mental health resources would be a significant factor in determining the overall score.

This scoring system provides a valuable framework for patients seeking primary care in Wrentham. It allows for an informed comparison of different practices, helping individuals make choices that align with their healthcare needs. The resulting analysis can also highlight areas where healthcare providers can improve their services, ultimately leading to better hypertension management within the community.

Beyond the individual practices, the broader landscape of primary care availability in Wrentham must be considered. This involves assessing the geographic distribution of practices, the acceptance of various insurance plans, and the availability of after-hours care. A community with a well-distributed network of primary care providers, accepting a wide range of insurance plans, and offering accessible after-hours care is better equipped to serve its residents.

The analysis should also consider the specific demographics of Wrentham. Understanding the age distribution, socioeconomic status, and prevalence of co-morbidities within the population is crucial for tailoring hypertension management strategies. For example, a community with a large elderly population may require more focus on geriatric care and medication management.

The final “Hypertension Score” analysis should be presented in a clear and concise manner. This could involve a visual representation, such as a map highlighting the location of each practice and its corresponding score. This visual approach allows for easy comparison and identification of areas with high-quality care and areas where improvements are needed.

The findings of this analysis can also inform public health initiatives. Local health departments and community organizations can use this information to identify gaps in care, target resources to underserved populations, and promote evidence-based hypertension management strategies. Collaboration between healthcare providers, community organizations, and public health agencies is essential for improving hypertension control within Wrentham.

This comprehensive assessment, integrating quantitative data with qualitative insights, provides a detailed understanding of the healthcare landscape in Wrentham. It identifies strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement, ultimately contributing to better hypertension management and improved health outcomes for residents. The analysis should be regularly updated to reflect changes in the healthcare environment.

For a dynamic and interactive visualization of the healthcare landscape in Wrentham, including the location of primary care practices, their hypertension scores, and associated data, explore the power of CartoChrome maps. Visualize the data and make informed decisions about your healthcare.