The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 02131, Roslindale, Massachusetts is 99 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 95.86 percent of the residents in 02131 has some form of health insurance. 34.80 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 69.56 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 02131 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 7,087 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 65 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 02131. An estimate of 29 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 3,959 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 11,738 health care providers accessible to residents in 02131, Roslindale, Massachusetts.
Health Scores in 02131, Roslindale, Massachusetts
Hypertension Score | 65 |
---|---|
People Score | 13 |
Provider Score | 99 |
Hospital Score | 29 |
Travel Score | 73 |
02131 | Roslindale | Massachusetts | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Hypertension Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 02131 & Primary Care in Roslindale
Analyzing healthcare accessibility and quality, particularly regarding hypertension management, requires a multi-faceted approach. This analysis focuses on the availability and performance of primary care physicians (PCPs) within ZIP code 02131 (Roslindale, MA) with a specific emphasis on their ability to address hypertension. We'll evaluate various factors, culminating in a hypothetical "Hypertension Score" to provide a comparative overview. This score isn't a real, standardized metric but rather a composite assessment based on available data and industry best practices.
Physician-to-patient ratios form a foundational element of this evaluation. A low ratio, indicating fewer doctors per capita, can strain access to care, potentially delaying diagnosis and treatment for conditions like hypertension. Publicly available data, such as that from the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Medicine and the US Census Bureau, allows us to estimate these ratios. We can determine the number of actively practicing PCPs within 02131 and compare it to the estimated population. A higher ratio, ideally, would suggest better access. However, this raw number doesn't tell the whole story.
The quality of care, particularly for a chronic condition like hypertension, hinges on various factors. Standout practices, those demonstrating superior performance, often employ evidence-based guidelines and patient-centered approaches. We can assess this by examining publicly available data (if any) on quality metrics, such as those related to blood pressure control rates, medication adherence, and the utilization of preventive services. We'll also consider patient reviews and practice accreditations, which can offer insights into patient satisfaction and the overall quality of care.
Telemedicine adoption is another critical aspect of modern healthcare delivery. Practices that embrace telemedicine can significantly improve access, especially for patients with mobility issues, transportation challenges, or those who prefer remote consultations. We'll evaluate the extent to which PCPs in 02131 offer telehealth services, including virtual appointments, remote monitoring, and online patient portals. Practices with robust telemedicine capabilities likely score higher on our "Hypertension Score" because they can provide more convenient and accessible care.
Mental health resources are inextricably linked to hypertension management. Stress and mental health conditions can significantly impact blood pressure. PCPs who integrate mental health services into their practice, either through in-house providers or strong referral networks, are better positioned to provide comprehensive care. We will assess the availability of mental health support within the practices in 02131. This includes whether practices have psychiatrists, psychologists, or therapists on staff, or if they have established referral pathways to mental health specialists. Practices with strong mental health integration are likely to achieve better patient outcomes.
Furthermore, we'll analyze the availability of patient education resources. Effective hypertension management requires patient understanding and adherence to treatment plans. Practices that provide educational materials, such as brochures, online resources, and group classes, empower patients to take an active role in their care. We'll assess the availability of these resources and the extent to which they are tailored to the specific needs of the Roslindale community.
To develop a hypothetical "Hypertension Score," we would assign weights to each of these factors. For example, physician-to-patient ratio might contribute 15% to the overall score, quality metrics 30%, telemedicine adoption 25%, mental health integration 20%, and patient education resources 10%. Each practice would then be evaluated based on its performance in each category, and a composite score would be calculated.
In the context of Roslindale (02131), we would seek to identify practices that excel in multiple areas. Perhaps a practice with a favorable physician-to-patient ratio, high blood pressure control rates, and robust telemedicine offerings would be a standout. Another might be recognized for its strong integration of mental health services and comprehensive patient education programs.
However, the landscape of healthcare is constantly evolving. The introduction of new technologies, changes in healthcare policies, and evolving patient needs necessitate continuous assessment. Regular updates to the "Hypertension Score" would be crucial to reflect these changes and provide the most accurate picture of healthcare accessibility and quality in 02131.
This analysis, while focusing on 02131, can be extended to other areas. By applying the same framework, we can compare the performance of PCPs in different ZIP codes and identify areas where improvements are needed. This type of comparative analysis can inform healthcare planning, resource allocation, and policy decisions. It can also help patients make informed choices about their healthcare providers.
Understanding the distribution of healthcare resources is crucial for addressing health disparities. By mapping the "Hypertension Score" across different geographic areas, we can identify communities that are underserved and target interventions to improve access and quality of care. This data-driven approach can contribute to a more equitable and effective healthcare system.
Further research could delve into the specific challenges faced by patients with hypertension in Roslindale. This might involve conducting patient surveys, focus groups, and interviews to gain a deeper understanding of their experiences and needs. This qualitative data can complement the quantitative analysis and provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of current interventions.
Ultimately, the goal of this analysis is to promote better hypertension management and improve the overall health of the Roslindale community. By providing a comprehensive assessment of healthcare accessibility and quality, we can empower patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers to work together to achieve this goal.
For an interactive visualization of this data and to explore the healthcare landscape in 02131 and beyond, consider using CartoChrome maps. Visualize physician density, practice locations, and other relevant data points to gain a deeper understanding of healthcare accessibility in your community.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like