The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 02451, Waltham, Massachusetts is 99 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 98.06 percent of the residents in 02451 has some form of health insurance. 30.88 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 82.78 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 02451 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 2,620 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 4 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 02451. An estimate of 3 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 3,145 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 3,293 health care providers accessible to residents in 02451, Waltham, Massachusetts.
Health Scores in 02451, Waltham, Massachusetts
Hypertension Score | 95 |
---|---|
People Score | 53 |
Provider Score | 99 |
Hospital Score | 54 |
Travel Score | 72 |
02451 | Waltham | Massachusetts | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Hypertension Score Analysis: Waltham, MA (ZIP Code 02451)
Analyzing the landscape of hypertension management in Waltham, Massachusetts (ZIP code 02451) requires a multi-faceted approach, considering not only the availability of primary care physicians but also the quality of care, patient access, and integration of modern healthcare technologies. This analysis aims to provide a "Hypertension Score" assessment, encompassing various factors crucial for effective hypertension control within the community.
The foundation of effective hypertension management rests on the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs). In Waltham, the physician-to-patient ratio is a critical indicator. While precise figures fluctuate, publicly available data, combined with local healthcare network information, suggests a moderate PCP density. This means that while access to a PCP is generally available, there might be periods of longer wait times for appointments, potentially impacting timely diagnosis and treatment initiation for individuals with or at risk of hypertension. This ratio needs constant monitoring to ensure it meets the needs of the growing population.
Beyond the raw numbers, the distribution of PCPs across the city is also important. Are there underserved areas within Waltham where access to primary care is more limited? This geographic disparity could lead to unequal access to hypertension screening, diagnosis, and treatment, potentially exacerbating health inequalities within the community. Data analysis, including information from insurance providers and local health departments, can help identify these potential gaps.
Several practices in Waltham stand out for their commitment to hypertension management. These practices often demonstrate a proactive approach, including robust screening programs, patient education initiatives, and integrated care models. They may utilize electronic health records (EHRs) effectively to track patient data, monitor blood pressure trends, and ensure timely follow-up appointments. These practices often have dedicated staff members, such as nurses or medical assistants, specifically trained in hypertension management. They may also participate in quality improvement initiatives, striving to meet and exceed established clinical guidelines.
Telemedicine adoption is another critical component of the Hypertension Score. The ability to offer virtual consultations, remote blood pressure monitoring, and medication management via telehealth platforms can significantly improve patient access and convenience, particularly for those with mobility limitations or transportation challenges. Practices that have embraced telemedicine demonstrate a commitment to patient-centered care and a willingness to leverage technology to improve outcomes. The extent of telemedicine adoption, including the availability of virtual appointments, remote monitoring devices, and secure communication channels, directly impacts the overall score.
Mental health resources play a crucial, often overlooked, role in hypertension management. Stress, anxiety, and depression can significantly impact blood pressure levels and adherence to treatment plans. Practices that integrate mental health services, either through in-house therapists or referrals to external providers, demonstrate a more holistic approach to patient care. This integration is particularly important given the prevalence of mental health challenges in the general population. The availability of mental health support directly contributes to the overall effectiveness of hypertension management strategies.
Furthermore, the availability of educational resources for patients is essential. Practices that provide patients with clear and concise information about hypertension, its causes, and its management strategies contribute to improved patient understanding and adherence to treatment plans. This includes providing information about lifestyle modifications, such as diet and exercise, as well as medication adherence. Patient education materials, whether provided in-person, online, or through printed materials, are a key factor in improving patient outcomes.
The integration of technology, beyond telemedicine, also influences the Hypertension Score. Practices that utilize patient portals for secure communication, appointment scheduling, and access to medical records contribute to improved patient engagement and convenience. The use of data analytics to identify patients at risk of hypertension, monitor blood pressure trends, and track treatment outcomes also plays a significant role. The degree to which practices leverage technology to enhance patient care is a key indicator of their commitment to effective hypertension management.
The availability of specialized services, such as cardiology consultations and access to registered dietitians, further enhances the quality of care. Practices that have established referral pathways to specialists and provide access to nutritional counseling demonstrate a comprehensive approach to managing hypertension and related cardiovascular risks. These services can address complex cases and provide patients with the specialized care they need.
Another factor to consider is the cost of care. The affordability of healthcare services, including consultations, medications, and diagnostic tests, is a critical determinant of patient access. Practices that offer transparent pricing, accept a wide range of insurance plans, and provide financial assistance programs contribute to improved patient access and adherence to treatment plans. The cost of care is a significant barrier for many individuals, and addressing this issue is essential for improving hypertension management outcomes.
The overall Hypertension Score for Waltham, MA (02451) is a composite of these factors. While the availability of PCPs is moderate, the quality of care varies across practices. Telemedicine adoption is growing, but not universally implemented. Mental health integration is improving, but there is room for further development. The presence of standout practices, coupled with the ongoing efforts of healthcare providers to improve patient care, indicates a positive trajectory for hypertension management in the community. However, continued monitoring and improvement are crucial to ensure that all residents have access to high-quality, affordable care.
To gain a more detailed understanding of the healthcare landscape in Waltham, including the location of practices, physician specialties, and access to resources, explore the interactive maps provided by CartoChrome. They offer a visual representation of the data, allowing for a more nuanced understanding of the factors influencing hypertension management in the community.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like