38621, Crenshaw, Mississippi Hypertension Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 38621, Crenshaw, Mississippi is 7 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 82.03 percent of the residents in 38621 has some form of health insurance. 64.40 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 26.49 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 38621 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 736 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 38621. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 311 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 825 health care providers accessible to residents in 38621, Crenshaw, Mississippi.

**Hypertension Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 38621 and Primary Care Availability in Crenshaw**

This analysis provides an in-depth look at the state of hypertension care within ZIP Code 38621 (likely representing a specific geographic area) and the broader primary care landscape in Crenshaw, focusing on factors relevant to managing hypertension. The goal is to assess the accessibility, quality, and resources available to patients, ultimately informing a “Hypertension Score” for the region.

The foundation of hypertension management lies in accessible primary care. In Crenshaw, evaluating primary care availability begins with assessing the physician-to-patient ratio. A low ratio, indicating fewer doctors per capita, can significantly hinder timely access to appointments, preventative screenings, and ongoing management. The availability of nurse practitioners and physician assistants (PAs) is also crucial, as they often play a vital role in providing primary care services, including hypertension management. Data from local healthcare providers, county health departments, and state medical boards would be necessary to accurately determine this ratio and assess the current demand.

Beyond the raw numbers, the geographic distribution of primary care practices within Crenshaw is a key consideration. Are practices concentrated in certain areas, leaving other communities underserved? This analysis should consider the presence of federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) or other safety-net providers, which often serve vulnerable populations with limited access to care. The location of these facilities relative to the population distribution is important.

Within ZIP Code 38621, a deep dive into the practices of individual physicians is essential. The “Hypertension Score” must consider several factors. Does each practice have a clear protocol for hypertension screening, diagnosis, and treatment? Are they utilizing evidence-based guidelines, such as those provided by the American Heart Association or the American College of Cardiology? The electronic health record (EHR) systems used by each practice should be evaluated. Do these systems have built-in features to facilitate hypertension management, such as automated reminders for blood pressure checks, medication reconciliation tools, and patient education resources?

The integration of telemedicine is another critical component of the analysis. The adoption of telehealth technologies can improve access to care, particularly for patients in rural or underserved areas, or those with mobility limitations. Do practices in 38621 offer virtual consultations for follow-up appointments, medication management, and patient education? The availability of remote blood pressure monitoring devices, which allow patients to track their blood pressure at home and share the data with their physicians, should also be assessed.

Mental health is inextricably linked to hypertension management. Stress and anxiety can significantly impact blood pressure, and patients with mental health conditions may face challenges in adhering to treatment plans. The “Hypertension Score” must therefore consider the availability of mental health resources within the primary care setting and the broader community. Do primary care practices offer on-site mental health services, or do they have established referral pathways to mental health professionals? The availability of support groups, educational programs, and other resources for patients with hypertension and co-occurring mental health conditions is also relevant.

Identifying standout practices within 38621 is a key element of this analysis. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to excellence in hypertension care should be highlighted. This might include practices with high rates of blood pressure control, robust patient education programs, or innovative approaches to care delivery. These practices could serve as models for other providers in the area.

The patient experience is paramount. The “Hypertension Score” should consider patient satisfaction with the care they receive. Are patients able to easily schedule appointments and communicate with their providers? Do they feel informed and empowered to manage their condition? Patient surveys, online reviews, and feedback from patient advocacy groups can provide valuable insights into the patient experience.

The socioeconomic characteristics of the population in 38621 and Crenshaw are also important factors to consider. Hypertension disproportionately affects certain populations, including those with lower incomes, limited access to healthy food, and inadequate health insurance coverage. The analysis should consider the prevalence of hypertension within these populations and the specific challenges they face in accessing and adhering to treatment.

The analysis should also examine the availability of community resources that support hypertension management. This includes access to healthy food options, opportunities for physical activity, and educational programs about hypertension. Partnerships between healthcare providers and community organizations can play a vital role in improving patient outcomes.

The “Hypertension Score” is not just a numerical rating. It is a holistic assessment of the healthcare landscape in 38621 and Crenshaw, considering factors beyond simple metrics. This score should be dynamic and updated regularly to reflect changes in the healthcare environment.

To gain a comprehensive understanding of the geographic distribution of healthcare resources, patient demographics, and other relevant data points, explore the power of visualization. Use CartoChrome maps to see the data come alive, identifying areas of need and opportunities for improvement.