Health Scores Near 38647, Michigan City, Mississippi
You may also like
The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 38647, Michigan City, Mississippi is 7 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 67.55 percent of the residents in 38647 has some form of health insurance. 59.44 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 8.11 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 38647 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 93 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 38647. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 112 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 191 health care providers accessible to residents in 38647, Michigan City, Mississippi.
Health Scores in 38647, Michigan City, Mississippi
| Hypertension Score | 6 |
|---|---|
| People Score | 41 |
| Provider Score | 7 |
| Hospital Score | 45 |
| Travel Score | 13 |
| 38647 | Michigan City | Mississippi | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Hypertension Score Analysis: Michigan City, Mississippi & Primary Care Landscape
This analysis provides a detailed overview of the primary care landscape in Michigan City, Mississippi (ZIP Code 38647), with a specific focus on factors impacting hypertension management. We will examine physician availability, practice characteristics, telemedicine integration, and the availability of mental health resources, culminating in a comprehensive "Hypertension Score" assessment. This score will reflect the overall capacity of the local healthcare system to effectively address and manage hypertension within the community.
Michigan City, a small town in northern Mississippi, presents unique challenges and opportunities in healthcare delivery. The population size, demographics, and socioeconomic factors influence the accessibility and quality of care. Our analysis will consider these elements in evaluating the local primary care environment.
**Physician-to-Patient Ratio and Access to Care:**
A critical component of the Hypertension Score is the physician-to-patient ratio. A higher ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventative care, and potentially delayed diagnosis and treatment of hypertension. Accurate data on the number of primary care physicians (PCPs) actively practicing within ZIP Code 38647 is essential. This data needs to be cross-referenced with the local population size to calculate the physician-to-patient ratio. We would also need to account for any specialists who may be involved in hypertension management, such as cardiologists, and their availability. This information will be a significant factor in determining the overall score.
Furthermore, the geographical distribution of PCPs within the ZIP code is crucial. Are practices concentrated in one area, or are they spread out, ensuring access for residents in all parts of the community? The availability of public transportation and the prevalence of chronic conditions like hypertension are also important considerations when evaluating access to care.
**Standout Practices and Their Characteristics:**
Identifying standout practices involves evaluating several key indicators. These include the quality of care provided, patient satisfaction scores, the adoption of evidence-based practices for hypertension management, and the availability of ancillary services. Practices that proactively screen for hypertension, offer patient education programs, and utilize electronic health records (EHRs) to track patient progress and manage medication adherence would likely receive higher scores.
The presence of certified diabetes educators, registered dietitians, and other healthcare professionals who can provide specialized support for patients with hypertension and related conditions is also a positive indicator. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to continuous quality improvement, such as participating in quality reporting programs, will also be viewed favorably. We need to assess the local practices for their adoption of these strategies.
**Telemedicine Adoption and Its Impact:**
Telemedicine has the potential to significantly improve hypertension management, particularly in rural areas where access to care can be limited. Practices that have embraced telemedicine for virtual consultations, remote patient monitoring, and medication management will receive a higher score. Telemedicine can reduce the need for in-person visits, improve medication adherence, and provide patients with more convenient access to care.
We need to determine the extent of telemedicine adoption within the local practices. This includes assessing the availability of virtual appointments, the use of remote monitoring devices (e.g., blood pressure cuffs), and the integration of telemedicine platforms with EHRs. Practices that are effectively utilizing telemedicine to improve patient outcomes will be recognized for their innovation and commitment to patient care.
**Mental Health Resources and Their Integration:**
The link between mental health and hypertension is well-established. Stress, anxiety, and depression can contribute to elevated blood pressure and make it more difficult to manage hypertension. The availability of mental health resources and their integration with primary care are crucial for comprehensive hypertension management.
We need to assess the availability of mental health providers (e.g., psychiatrists, psychologists, therapists) within the community. The extent to which primary care practices collaborate with mental health providers is also critical. Practices that offer integrated behavioral health services, such as on-site counseling or referrals to mental health specialists, will receive a higher score. The ability of primary care physicians to screen for mental health conditions and provide appropriate referrals is another factor to consider.
**Hypertension Score Calculation and Overall Assessment:**
The Hypertension Score will be calculated based on a weighted average of the factors discussed above. The physician-to-patient ratio will be a significant factor, followed by the quality of care provided by standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health resources. Each factor will be assigned a weight based on its relative importance in hypertension management.
The final score will be presented on a scale, allowing for a clear understanding of the overall capacity of the local healthcare system to effectively address and manage hypertension. The score will also highlight areas for improvement and provide insights for healthcare providers, policymakers, and community members.
**Conclusion and Call to Action:**
The primary care landscape in Michigan City, Mississippi, presents a complex picture. Factors like physician availability, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resource integration all contribute to the overall effectiveness of hypertension management. A thorough assessment of these elements is crucial for understanding the community's healthcare needs and identifying opportunities for improvement.
To gain a visual understanding of the healthcare landscape in Michigan City and other communities, explore the power of data visualization. **Visit CartoChrome maps today to explore interactive maps and gain valuable insights into healthcare access and resources.**
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like
