38768, Rome, Mississippi Hypertension Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 38768, Rome, Mississippi is 37 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 73.33 percent of the residents in 38768 has some form of health insurance. 57.78 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 73.33 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 38768 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 0 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 38768. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 18 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 424 health care providers accessible to residents in 38768, Rome, Mississippi.

## Hypertension Score Analysis: 38768 & Rome Primary Care

Analyzing hypertension management requires a multifaceted approach, considering both the quality of care provided by physicians and the accessibility of that care within a given geographic area. This analysis will delve into the specific context of doctors in ZIP Code 38768 and primary care availability in Rome, aiming to provide a "Hypertension Score" assessment. The score, though not a numerical value, will be a qualitative ranking based on several key factors.

**ZIP Code 38768: A Deep Dive into Physician Practices**

ZIP Code 38768, a specific geographic area, necessitates a close examination of the existing primary care infrastructure. The first crucial element is the physician-to-patient ratio. A high ratio, indicating fewer doctors for a larger population, can strain resources and potentially impact the quality and timeliness of care. Conversely, a low ratio suggests greater access to physicians, allowing for more personalized attention and proactive management of conditions like hypertension. Researching the specific number of primary care physicians practicing within 38768, alongside the total population of the area, is the initial step.

Once physician density is understood, an assessment of individual practices becomes essential. Identifying standout practices involves looking beyond basic metrics. Are there practices that have demonstrated a commitment to hypertension management through specific programs? Do they actively utilize evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis and treatment? This involves looking at their patient outcomes data, if publicly available. Do they offer extended hours or weekend appointments to improve access? Furthermore, what is the patient satisfaction level, and how do they handle patient education regarding lifestyle modifications, medication adherence, and regular monitoring?

Telemedicine adoption is another critical factor. The ability to offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring of blood pressure, and online patient portals can significantly enhance hypertension management, especially for patients in rural areas or those with mobility limitations. Practices that have embraced telemedicine can potentially offer more frequent check-ins and proactive interventions, leading to better control of hypertension. Examining the types of telemedicine services offered, the ease of use for patients, and the integration of these services into the overall care plan is crucial.

Mental health resources are often overlooked in the context of hypertension, but they are intrinsically linked. Stress, anxiety, and depression can significantly impact blood pressure control. Practices that integrate mental health services, either through in-house therapists or referrals to external providers, are better positioned to provide holistic care. Assessing the availability of these resources, the ease of access for patients, and the coordination between primary care physicians and mental health professionals is vital for a comprehensive hypertension score.

**Primary Care Availability in Rome: A Broader Perspective**

Rome, as a larger geographical area, requires a broader perspective on primary care availability. The analysis must extend beyond individual practices to consider the overall healthcare landscape. The distribution of primary care physicians across the city is important. Are there underserved areas with limited access to care? This requires mapping the location of primary care practices and comparing it to the population density and demographics of different neighborhoods.

The presence of community health centers or free clinics can significantly improve access to care for vulnerable populations. These facilities often provide comprehensive services, including hypertension management, at reduced costs. Evaluating the existence, capacity, and quality of these resources is essential.

Furthermore, the availability of specialist support is critical. Patients with uncontrolled hypertension often require referral to cardiologists or nephrologists. Assessing the ease of access to these specialists, the waiting times for appointments, and the coordination of care between primary care physicians and specialists is a key component of the analysis.

The role of hospitals and emergency rooms in hypertension management also deserves consideration. Are hospitals equipped to handle hypertensive crises effectively? Do they have protocols in place for the rapid diagnosis and treatment of patients with dangerously high blood pressure? Evaluating the responsiveness of the local healthcare system to acute hypertension events is essential.

**Synthesizing the Information: A Qualitative Hypertension Score**

Based on the factors discussed, a qualitative "Hypertension Score" can be assigned. This score will reflect the overall quality and accessibility of hypertension management in the specified areas. A higher score indicates a more robust and patient-centered approach, while a lower score suggests areas for improvement.

For ZIP Code 38768, the score will be influenced by the physician-to-patient ratio, the quality of individual practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health resources. For Rome, the score will consider the distribution of primary care physicians, the availability of community health centers, the ease of access to specialists, and the responsiveness of the hospital system.

The final score will not be a simple average of these factors, but rather a nuanced assessment that considers the interplay between them. For example, a high physician-to-patient ratio in 38768 might be offset by the widespread adoption of telemedicine and strong patient education programs. Conversely, a city like Rome might have a good physician-to-patient ratio but face challenges in coordinating care between primary care physicians and specialists.

**Conclusion: Visualizing the Data with CartoChrome Maps**

Understanding the complexities of hypertension management requires a comprehensive and data-driven approach. While this analysis provides a qualitative assessment, the true power lies in visualizing the data. CartoChrome maps offer a powerful platform for mapping and analyzing healthcare data, allowing for a deeper understanding of physician distribution, patient demographics, and access to care. By using CartoChrome, you can create interactive maps that highlight areas with high needs, identify gaps in care, and visualize the impact of different interventions.

**Call to Action:**

Ready to visualize the data and gain a deeper understanding of hypertension management in your community? Explore the power of CartoChrome maps and unlock valuable insights. Visit [Insert CartoChrome Website Link Here] to learn more and start mapping today.