38856, Marietta, Mississippi Hypertension Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 38856, Marietta, Mississippi is 17 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 97.68 percent of the residents in 38856 has some form of health insurance. 38.13 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 69.65 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 38856 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 462 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 38856. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 309 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 492 health care providers accessible to residents in 38856, Marietta, Mississippi.

## Hypertension Score Analysis: Comparing Physician Access and Resources

This analysis evaluates the landscape of hypertension management within ZIP Code 38856 (assumed location) and compares it to the availability of primary care resources in Marietta, Georgia, focusing on factors relevant to a hypothetical "Hypertension Score" for each area. The goal is to assess the accessibility and quality of care for individuals managing hypertension, considering physician availability, technological adoption, and mental health support.

**38856: A Deep Dive into Hypertension Management**

Within ZIP Code 38856, a comprehensive assessment begins with understanding the physician-to-patient ratio. This metric provides a fundamental gauge of access. A low ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, could signal potential challenges in securing timely appointments, leading to delayed diagnoses and management of hypertension. Publicly available data sources, such as the US Census Bureau and state medical board registries, should be utilized to determine the exact ratio. This ratio should be compared against both state and national averages to establish a baseline for comparison.

Beyond raw numbers, the type of physicians available is crucial. Are there sufficient primary care physicians (PCPs), cardiologists, and endocrinologists to meet the needs of a population managing hypertension? The presence of specialists is critical for complex cases and advanced management strategies. Analyzing the specialties represented within the ZIP Code provides insight into the breadth of care available.

The "Hypertension Score" should also factor in the adoption of telemedicine. Telemedicine offers a valuable avenue for remote monitoring, medication management, and follow-up appointments, particularly beneficial for patients in rural areas or with mobility limitations. Identifying practices that actively utilize telemedicine platforms, including the types of services offered (e.g., virtual consultations, remote blood pressure monitoring), is essential.

Furthermore, the integration of mental health resources is paramount. Hypertension often co-occurs with conditions like anxiety and depression, which can significantly impact treatment adherence and overall well-being. The analysis should identify practices that offer integrated mental health services or have established referral pathways to mental health professionals. This could involve on-site therapists, partnerships with local mental health providers, or the availability of mental health resources through telehealth platforms.

A standout practice, for example, might be one that proactively addresses these needs. This could be a clinic with a high physician-to-patient ratio, robust telemedicine capabilities, and integrated mental health services. Such a practice would likely receive a higher score, reflecting its commitment to comprehensive hypertension management. Conversely, a practice with limited access, minimal telemedicine adoption, and no mental health integration would likely receive a lower score.

**Marietta: Primary Care Availability and its Impact**

In contrast to the specific ZIP Code analysis, Marietta's evaluation focuses on the broader availability of primary care resources. This is a crucial component, as PCPs often serve as the first point of contact for hypertension management. The analysis should consider the density of primary care practices within Marietta, considering factors like geographic distribution and ease of access for residents.

The physician-to-patient ratio in Marietta, specifically for primary care physicians, should be determined. This ratio provides a general indicator of access to primary care services. A higher ratio suggests greater accessibility, potentially leading to earlier detection and intervention for hypertension.

The analysis should assess the presence of larger healthcare systems and their impact on primary care availability. Large systems often have a broader network of physicians, resources, and specialized services. The presence of these systems could positively influence the "Hypertension Score" by increasing the overall capacity for hypertension management.

The adoption of telemedicine by primary care practices in Marietta is another crucial factor. As with the 38856 analysis, the extent of telemedicine adoption should be examined. Practices utilizing virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and patient portals are likely to offer better access and convenience for patients.

Furthermore, the analysis should consider the integration of mental health services within primary care practices. The availability of on-site therapists, partnerships with mental health providers, or access to mental health resources through telehealth platforms can significantly improve patient outcomes. Practices that prioritize mental health integration would likely receive a higher score.

**Comparing the Two Landscapes**

Comparing the "Hypertension Scores" of 38856 and Marietta requires a standardized methodology. The assessment must consider factors such as physician-to-patient ratios, telemedicine adoption, and mental health integration. By comparing these metrics, a relative ranking can be established. For example, if 38856 has a lower physician-to-patient ratio but a strong telemedicine program, its score might be comparable to Marietta, which has a higher physician-to-patient ratio but limited telemedicine options.

The analysis should also consider the demographic profiles of both areas. Factors such as age, socioeconomic status, and prevalence of chronic diseases can influence the demand for hypertension management services. These factors should be considered when interpreting the "Hypertension Scores."

Ultimately, the comparison aims to provide a clear understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of each area in terms of hypertension management. This information can be used to identify areas for improvement and to inform healthcare planning and resource allocation.

**Leveraging Data Visualization for Enhanced Understanding**

Understanding the spatial distribution of healthcare resources and patient needs is crucial. Visualizing the data using interactive maps can provide valuable insights. CartoChrome maps can be used to visualize physician locations, patient demographics, and the availability of healthcare services. This visualization allows for a more intuitive understanding of the landscape of hypertension management.

Want to explore the spatial distribution of healthcare resources and patient needs in your area? **Visit CartoChrome maps today and visualize the data for yourself.**