38920, Cascilla, Mississippi Hypertension Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 38920, Cascilla, Mississippi is 32 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 95.34 percent of the residents in 38920 has some form of health insurance. 62.87 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 41.80 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 38920 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 131 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 38920. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 112 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 541 health care providers accessible to residents in 38920, Cascilla, Mississippi.

**Hypertension Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 38920 & Primary Care Availability in Cascilla**

Analyzing healthcare access and quality in the Cascilla, Mississippi area, specifically within ZIP code 38920, requires a multifaceted approach. We'll examine the availability of primary care physicians, the prevalence of hypertension, and the resources available to manage this condition. This analysis will attempt to provide a "Hypertension Score" based on the available data, though a precise numerical score is impossible without comprehensive, proprietary datasets.

The foundation of effective hypertension management lies in accessible primary care. Cascilla, a rural community, likely faces challenges common to such areas. The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical indicator. A high ratio, meaning fewer doctors per capita, directly impacts appointment availability, follow-up care, and overall patient management. Publicly available data, such as those from the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), can provide insights into physician shortages. However, this data might not be granular enough to reflect the specific situation within ZIP code 38920.

The prevalence of hypertension within the community is another key factor. National and state-level data on hypertension prevalence can be used as a baseline. However, local health departments and community health centers are often the best sources for localized data. Factors such as demographics, socioeconomic status, and access to healthy food options can significantly influence hypertension rates. The analysis needs to consider the specific demographics of Cascilla to understand the potential impact of these factors.

Standout practices are those demonstrating excellence in hypertension management. These could include clinics with specialized hypertension programs, those utilizing evidence-based guidelines, and those with high patient satisfaction scores. Identifying these practices requires careful research, including reviews, and potentially contacting local healthcare organizations. Key features to look for include regular blood pressure monitoring, patient education programs, medication management protocols, and a focus on lifestyle modifications.

Telemedicine adoption is an increasingly important aspect of healthcare delivery, especially in rural areas. Telemedicine can improve access to care by reducing travel time and costs. It can facilitate virtual consultations, remote monitoring of blood pressure, and medication management. Practices actively utilizing telemedicine for hypertension management would likely receive a higher score. The availability of reliable internet access in the community is a crucial prerequisite for successful telemedicine implementation.

Mental health resources are inextricably linked to hypertension management. Stress and mental health conditions can significantly impact blood pressure. Practices that integrate mental health services into their care models, either through in-house therapists or referrals to external providers, are better positioned to provide comprehensive care. This integration could include screening for anxiety and depression, providing counseling services, and collaborating with mental health specialists to manage patients' overall well-being.

The "Hypertension Score" for doctors in 38920 will be influenced by several factors. A high score would indicate: a favorable physician-to-patient ratio, readily available appointments, a demonstrated commitment to evidence-based hypertension management, active use of telemedicine, and integration of mental health services. Conversely, a low score would reflect the opposite: physician shortages, limited access to care, a lack of specialized hypertension programs, minimal telemedicine adoption, and a lack of mental health support.

The analysis also needs to consider the availability of support services. This includes access to pharmacies, nutritionists, and other healthcare professionals who can assist in managing hypertension. Community health programs that promote healthy lifestyles, such as exercise classes and healthy eating initiatives, would also contribute positively to the overall score.

Assessing the quality of care involves considering patient outcomes. This requires data on blood pressure control rates, rates of complications (such as heart attack and stroke), and patient satisfaction. Gathering this data can be challenging, as it may require access to patient records or surveys. However, it is essential for a comprehensive evaluation of hypertension management effectiveness.

The challenges facing Cascilla, like many rural communities, are significant. Addressing these challenges requires a collaborative effort involving healthcare providers, community organizations, and local government. Improving access to primary care, promoting healthy lifestyles, and expanding the use of telemedicine are crucial steps in improving hypertension management.

The analysis must also consider the specific needs of the population. Tailoring interventions to the local demographics, addressing socioeconomic disparities, and providing culturally sensitive care are essential for achieving optimal outcomes.

The final "Hypertension Score" is a composite of all these factors. It is a reflection of the community's ability to prevent, diagnose, and manage hypertension effectively. While a precise numerical score is difficult to generate without in-depth, proprietary data, a qualitative assessment based on the factors discussed provides a valuable overview of the situation.

To visualize the geographical distribution of healthcare resources, and to gain a better understanding of the factors influencing hypertension rates in Cascilla and surrounding areas, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps can provide valuable insights into healthcare access, demographics, and other relevant data.