39057, Conehatta, Mississippi Hypertension Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 39057, Conehatta, Mississippi is 15 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 69.14 percent of the residents in 39057 has some form of health insurance. 36.78 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 39.42 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 39057 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 717 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 39057. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 341 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 199 health care providers accessible to residents in 39057, Conehatta, Mississippi.

## Hypertension Score Analysis: Conehatta, Mississippi (ZIP Code 39057)

Conehatta, Mississippi, nestled in rural Newton County, presents a unique set of challenges and opportunities in the fight against hypertension. This analysis delves into the availability of primary care physicians, their approach to hypertension management, and the overall healthcare landscape within ZIP code 39057, providing a "Hypertension Score" assessment. The score is not a single number but a composite understanding of the factors influencing hypertension control in this specific area.

The cornerstone of hypertension management is accessible primary care. In Conehatta, the physician-to-patient ratio is a critical factor. Rural areas often face shortages, and the availability of primary care physicians directly impacts the ability of residents to receive regular checkups, screenings, and consistent medication management. A low physician-to-patient ratio suggests potential difficulties in securing timely appointments and follow-up care, which can negatively impact hypertension control. The analysis must consider the number of practicing primary care physicians within the ZIP code, as well as the availability of specialists, such as cardiologists, who can provide more specialized care when needed.

Standout practices within the area can significantly improve the Hypertension Score. These practices often demonstrate a proactive approach to patient care, implementing evidence-based guidelines for hypertension management. Key indicators include the consistent measurement and recording of blood pressure, the use of standardized protocols for diagnosis and treatment, and the implementation of patient education programs. Practices that actively engage patients in their care, providing them with the knowledge and tools to manage their condition effectively, are likely to achieve better outcomes. Furthermore, practices that have adopted electronic health records (EHRs) are better positioned to track patient data, monitor progress, and identify individuals at risk.

Telemedicine adoption is another crucial element in evaluating the Hypertension Score. In a rural setting like Conehatta, where geographical barriers can limit access to care, telemedicine offers a promising solution. Telemedicine allows patients to connect with their physicians remotely, facilitating virtual consultations, medication management, and remote monitoring of blood pressure. Practices that have embraced telemedicine can extend their reach, provide more convenient access to care, and potentially improve patient adherence to treatment plans. The availability of reliable internet access is, however, a significant factor in determining the feasibility of telemedicine adoption in this area.

Mental health resources are often overlooked in the context of hypertension management, but they play a vital role. Stress, anxiety, and depression can significantly impact blood pressure levels. Patients struggling with mental health issues may also find it challenging to adhere to their treatment plans. Therefore, the availability of mental health services, including counseling, therapy, and psychiatric care, is an essential component of a comprehensive hypertension management strategy. Practices that integrate mental health services into their care model are likely to achieve better outcomes for their patients. The analysis must consider the availability of mental health professionals, the accessibility of mental health services, and the level of collaboration between primary care physicians and mental health providers.

The specific practices within Conehatta should be evaluated based on their adherence to evidence-based guidelines for hypertension management. This includes the use of recommended medications, lifestyle modifications, and regular blood pressure monitoring. Practices that are actively participating in quality improvement initiatives, such as those aimed at improving blood pressure control rates, should be recognized. The analysis should also consider the patient demographics served by each practice, as certain populations may face unique challenges in managing hypertension.

The analysis must also consider the socioeconomic factors that influence hypertension control. Poverty, lack of access to healthy food options, and limited opportunities for physical activity can all contribute to poor outcomes. The analysis should assess the availability of resources that address these social determinants of health, such as food banks, community gardens, and recreational facilities.

The overall Hypertension Score for Conehatta, Mississippi, would be a complex assessment based on the factors discussed. A low physician-to-patient ratio, limited telemedicine adoption, and a scarcity of mental health resources would negatively impact the score. Conversely, practices that demonstrate a proactive approach to patient care, implement evidence-based guidelines, and integrate mental health services would contribute to a higher score. The availability of resources that address social determinants of health would also be a positive factor.

The analysis should include specific examples of practices and their approaches. For instance, a practice that offers extended hours, same-day appointments, and patient education materials would be considered favorably. A practice that utilizes remote blood pressure monitoring and virtual consultations would also be highly regarded. The analysis should also identify any gaps in care and recommend strategies for improvement.

Ultimately, improving the Hypertension Score in Conehatta requires a multi-faceted approach. This includes increasing the availability of primary care physicians, promoting telemedicine adoption, expanding access to mental health resources, and addressing the social determinants of health. By focusing on these key areas, the community can work towards better hypertension control and improved health outcomes for its residents.

For a visual representation of the healthcare landscape in Conehatta, including physician locations, access to resources, and demographic data, consider utilizing CartoChrome maps. Explore the interactive maps to gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare access and availability in your area.