The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 39159, Rolling Fork, Mississippi is 32 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 72.17 percent of the residents in 39159 has some form of health insurance. 40.04 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 37.28 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 39159 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 750 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 39159. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 499 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 46 health care providers accessible to residents in 39159, Rolling Fork, Mississippi.
Health Scores in 39159, Rolling Fork, Mississippi
Hypertension Score | 4 |
---|---|
People Score | 21 |
Provider Score | 32 |
Hospital Score | 16 |
Travel Score | 26 |
39159 | Rolling Fork | Mississippi | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Hypertension Score Analysis: Rolling Fork, MS (ZIP Code 39159)
Rolling Fork, Mississippi, a small community nestled within the Mississippi Delta, presents a unique landscape for analyzing hypertension management. This analysis, focusing on ZIP code 39159, evaluates the availability and quality of primary care services, crucial for addressing the prevalence of hypertension, a significant health concern in this region. We will delve into physician-to-patient ratios, identify standout practices, examine telemedicine adoption, and assess the availability of mental health resources, all factors influencing a hypothetical “Hypertension Score” for the area.
The foundation of effective hypertension management lies in accessible primary care. In Rolling Fork, the physician-to-patient ratio is a critical metric. Data from sources like the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) will be essential to establish a baseline. A low ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, presents challenges. Patients may face longer wait times for appointments, potentially delaying diagnosis and treatment. This scarcity can also strain existing healthcare providers, impacting their ability to provide comprehensive care. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests better access and improved opportunities for proactive hypertension management. This impacts the 'Hypertension Score' positively.
Identifying standout practices within 39159 requires a multi-faceted approach. We'd look beyond simple metrics. Practices that prioritize patient education, offer comprehensive blood pressure monitoring programs, and emphasize lifestyle modifications (diet, exercise) would score higher. Examining patient satisfaction surveys, if available, provides valuable insights into the patient experience. Are patients comfortable discussing their concerns? Do they feel heard and understood? Practices with positive patient feedback, reflecting a strong patient-provider relationship, are likely to achieve better hypertension control rates. This impacts the 'Hypertension Score' positively.
Telemedicine adoption is another critical element. Telemedicine can bridge geographical barriers, especially in rural areas like Rolling Fork. It allows patients to access healthcare services remotely, reducing the need for travel and improving convenience. Practices utilizing telemedicine for follow-up appointments, medication management, and patient education would receive a higher score. The availability of secure video conferencing platforms, remote blood pressure monitoring devices, and digital health tools all contribute to a practice's telemedicine readiness. This impacts the 'Hypertension Score' positively.
The link between mental health and hypertension is increasingly recognized. Stress and anxiety can significantly impact blood pressure levels. The availability of mental health resources within the community is, therefore, a crucial factor. The presence of mental health professionals, such as psychiatrists, psychologists, and licensed clinical social workers, is essential. Assessing the accessibility of these resources, including insurance acceptance and wait times, is vital. Practices that integrate mental health screening and referrals into their hypertension management protocols demonstrate a more holistic approach, positively impacting the 'Hypertension Score'.
Beyond the immediate medical landscape, community-level factors play a role. Access to healthy food options, safe spaces for physical activity, and community-based health programs all influence hypertension prevalence and management. Initiatives promoting healthy lifestyles, such as farmers' markets, walking trails, and community health education programs, contribute to a healthier environment, indirectly impacting the 'Hypertension Score'.
Data sources for this analysis would include public health agencies, medical directories, and potentially, local hospital systems. Patient testimonials, if available, could provide valuable qualitative data. The analysis would need to be updated regularly to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape, such as new practices opening, telemedicine adoption rates, and the availability of mental health resources.
The 'Hypertension Score' itself would be a composite measure, weighting the factors discussed above. A scoring system would be developed, assigning points based on physician-to-patient ratios, telemedicine adoption, mental health integration, and other relevant criteria. The final score would provide a snapshot of the overall quality of hypertension management in Rolling Fork, MS (39159). The higher the score, the better the access and quality of care.
In conclusion, assessing hypertension management in Rolling Fork, MS (39159) requires a comprehensive understanding of the local healthcare ecosystem. Physician-to-patient ratios, telemedicine adoption, the integration of mental health resources, and community-level factors all contribute to the effectiveness of hypertension management. By analyzing these factors, we can gain valuable insights into the challenges and opportunities for improving cardiovascular health in this rural community.
Are you interested in visualizing this data and exploring the spatial distribution of healthcare resources in Rolling Fork and beyond? CartoChrome maps can provide a dynamic and interactive platform for understanding the healthcare landscape. Leverage our mapping capabilities to identify areas with limited access to care, visualize physician density, and analyze the impact of telemedicine adoption. Contact CartoChrome today to explore how we can help you visualize and analyze healthcare data for informed decision-making.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like