39177, Valley Park, Mississippi Hypertension Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 39177, Valley Park, Mississippi is 78 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 88.24 percent of the residents in 39177 has some form of health insurance. 88.24 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 80.00 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 39177 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 0 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 39177. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 75 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 758 health care providers accessible to residents in 39177, Valley Park, Mississippi.

## Hypertension Score Analysis: Valley Park, Mississippi (ZIP Code 39177)

This analysis provides a comprehensive overview of hypertension management capabilities within ZIP Code 39177, Valley Park, Mississippi, focusing on primary care availability and the resources available to address hypertension. The goal is to understand the landscape of care, identify potential gaps, and highlight strengths within the community. The analysis will assess the availability of primary care physicians, the integration of technology, and the accessibility of mental health support, all crucial factors in effective hypertension control.

Valley Park, a small community in Mississippi, presents unique challenges and opportunities in healthcare delivery. The rural nature of the area can affect access to care, and socioeconomic factors may impact patient adherence to treatment plans. Understanding these complexities is vital for a complete assessment.

**Primary Care Availability and Physician-to-Patient Ratios**

Assessing the physician-to-patient ratio is a critical first step. This metric provides a general indication of access to care. A higher ratio (fewer patients per physician) typically suggests better access, while a lower ratio may indicate potential shortages and longer wait times for appointments. Information regarding the specific physician-to-patient ratio within 39177 is difficult to ascertain without direct access to proprietary datasets. However, publicly available data from the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) and the Mississippi State Department of Health can offer some insight. Analyzing this data, while not providing exact numbers, can establish a general sense of the availability of primary care physicians in the area.

Further research would involve identifying the number of primary care physicians practicing within the ZIP code. This includes family medicine doctors, internal medicine specialists, and general practitioners. The number of residents in the area would then be divided by the number of physicians to derive a physician-to-patient ratio. This ratio, along with the availability of specialists, would be a key determinant of the Hypertension Score.

**Standout Practices and Their Contributions**

Identifying standout practices involves evaluating several factors. This includes the quality of care provided, patient satisfaction, and the implementation of best practices in hypertension management. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to patient education, regular monitoring, and aggressive treatment protocols are likely to achieve better outcomes.

Assessing the quality of care requires looking at patient outcomes, such as blood pressure control rates, rates of complications (e.g., stroke, heart attack), and patient adherence to medication regimens. Patient satisfaction surveys can provide valuable insights into the patient experience, including the ease of scheduling appointments, the clarity of communication from healthcare providers, and the overall level of support received.

Practices that have adopted innovative approaches to hypertension management may be considered standout practices. This could include the use of electronic health records (EHRs) to track patient data, the implementation of patient portals for communication and education, and the use of remote monitoring devices to track blood pressure at home.

**Telemedicine Adoption and Its Impact**

Telemedicine has the potential to significantly improve access to care, especially in rural areas like Valley Park. It allows patients to connect with their physicians remotely, reducing the need for travel and potentially improving medication adherence. The adoption of telemedicine within 39177 is a crucial element of the Hypertension Score.

Evaluating telemedicine adoption involves assessing the availability of virtual consultations, the use of remote monitoring devices, and the integration of telehealth platforms into existing workflows. Practices that have embraced telemedicine are likely to be better equipped to manage patients with hypertension, particularly those with mobility issues or limited access to transportation.

The effectiveness of telemedicine in hypertension management depends on several factors, including the availability of reliable internet access, the patient's comfort with technology, and the physician's ability to provide virtual care. Practices should provide training and support to patients to ensure they can effectively utilize telemedicine services.

**Mental Health Resources and Their Integration**

Mental health plays a significant role in hypertension management. Stress, anxiety, and depression can contribute to elevated blood pressure and interfere with treatment adherence. The availability and integration of mental health resources are crucial for providing comprehensive care.

Assessing mental health resources involves identifying the availability of mental health professionals, such as psychiatrists, psychologists, and therapists, within the community. It also involves evaluating the integration of mental health services into primary care practices. This could include screening for mental health conditions, providing brief interventions, and referring patients to specialized mental health services.

Practices that have established partnerships with mental health providers are better equipped to address the psychological needs of patients with hypertension. This collaboration can help patients manage stress, improve their coping skills, and enhance their adherence to treatment plans.

**Overall Hypertension Score and Conclusion**

Determining a precise Hypertension Score for Valley Park, Mississippi, requires a comprehensive data analysis that considers all the factors discussed above. This includes the physician-to-patient ratio, the quality of care provided by local practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources.

The final score would reflect the overall capacity of the community to effectively manage hypertension. A high score would indicate good access to care, the implementation of best practices, and the integration of mental health services. A low score would suggest potential gaps in care and the need for improvements.

The ultimate goal of this analysis is to provide a clear picture of the healthcare landscape in Valley Park and to identify areas for improvement. By understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system, stakeholders can develop strategies to enhance the quality of care and improve the health outcomes of residents.

To visualize and further analyze the data related to hypertension management in Valley Park and other areas, consider utilizing CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome offers advanced mapping and data visualization tools that can help you gain deeper insights into healthcare access, patient demographics, and health outcomes. Explore the possibilities and transform your data into actionable intelligence.