The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 39346, Noxapater, Mississippi is 17 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 89.11 percent of the residents in 39346 has some form of health insurance. 45.25 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 55.04 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 39346 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 317 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 39346. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 403 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 664 health care providers accessible to residents in 39346, Noxapater, Mississippi.
Health Scores in 39346, Noxapater, Mississippi
Hypertension Score | 33 |
---|---|
People Score | 72 |
Provider Score | 17 |
Hospital Score | 38 |
Travel Score | 41 |
39346 | Noxapater | Mississippi | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Hypertension Score Analysis: Noxapater, Mississippi (ZIP Code 39346)
Analyzing the landscape of hypertension care within ZIP code 39346, encompassing the town of Noxapater, Mississippi, requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis will delve into key factors influencing a "Hypertension Score" for local physicians, focusing on primary care availability, physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources. The goal is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the healthcare environment for individuals managing hypertension in this rural setting.
The foundation of effective hypertension management lies in accessible primary care. In Noxapater, assessing primary care availability involves understanding the number of practicing primary care physicians (PCPs) within the ZIP code and the surrounding areas, as well as the appointment wait times and the acceptance of new patients. A low number of PCPs, coupled with long wait times, significantly impacts the ability of patients to receive timely diagnoses, medication adjustments, and ongoing monitoring, all crucial for controlling blood pressure. The presence of community health centers or federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) is also a vital factor, as these facilities often provide affordable care and serve vulnerable populations.
Physician-to-patient ratios are a critical metric. A high ratio, indicating a smaller number of physicians serving a larger population, can strain the healthcare system. This can lead to reduced appointment times, less personalized care, and increased patient frustration. Analyzing the patient panel sizes of individual practices within the ZIP code is essential. Practices with a smaller patient load per physician often have more capacity to dedicate time to each patient, facilitating more comprehensive hypertension management. This is particularly important in rural areas where access to specialists might be limited.
Identifying standout practices requires a deeper dive into their operational models. Practices that prioritize patient education, offer extended hours, or have dedicated staff focused on chronic disease management, such as certified diabetes educators or registered nurses, are likely to achieve better outcomes in hypertension control. The use of electronic health records (EHRs) that facilitate data tracking, medication reconciliation, and automated reminders for follow-up appointments is also a positive indicator. Furthermore, practices that actively participate in quality improvement initiatives and regularly review their patient outcomes demonstrate a commitment to providing high-quality care.
Telemedicine adoption is increasingly important, especially in rural areas. Telemedicine can bridge geographical barriers, providing patients with access to consultations, medication management, and remote monitoring. The availability of telehealth services, including video visits and remote blood pressure monitoring programs, can significantly improve hypertension control by enabling more frequent contact between patients and their healthcare providers. Practices that embrace telemedicine demonstrate a forward-thinking approach to patient care and can potentially reach a wider patient base.
The integration of mental health resources is a crucial, often overlooked, aspect of hypertension management. Stress and anxiety can significantly impact blood pressure. Practices that offer on-site mental health services, or have established referral networks with local therapists and psychiatrists, are better equipped to address the holistic needs of their patients. This integrated approach can lead to improved patient outcomes and better overall well-being. Screening for depression and anxiety during routine checkups is a proactive measure that can identify patients who may benefit from mental health support.
The specific practices within ZIP code 39346 and the surrounding areas need to be evaluated individually. This involves gathering data on their staffing levels, patient panel sizes, telemedicine capabilities, and the availability of mental health resources. Publicly available data from sources like the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), state medical boards, and insurance providers can provide valuable insights. Patient reviews and feedback can also offer a subjective perspective on the quality of care provided by individual practices.
The "Hypertension Score" for each physician should consider all of these factors. A comprehensive scoring system would assign weights to each category, reflecting its relative importance in achieving optimal hypertension control. For example, primary care availability and physician-to-patient ratios might be weighted heavily, while telemedicine adoption and mental health integration would also contribute significantly. Practices with higher scores would be recognized for their commitment to providing comprehensive hypertension care.
In conclusion, assessing the hypertension care landscape in Noxapater requires a thorough examination of primary care access, physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources. By analyzing these factors, it is possible to create a "Hypertension Score" that can help patients make informed decisions about their healthcare and identify practices that are committed to providing high-quality hypertension management.
To visualize this data and gain a spatial understanding of healthcare resources in Noxapater, consider using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome offers a powerful platform for mapping and analyzing healthcare data, providing valuable insights into the distribution of physicians, healthcare facilities, and patient populations.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like