39664, Smithdale, Mississippi Hypertension Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 39664, Smithdale, Mississippi is 8 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 96.60 percent of the residents in 39664 has some form of health insurance. 45.41 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 66.14 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 39664 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 358 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 39664. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 534 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 914 health care providers accessible to residents in 39664, Smithdale, Mississippi.

## Hypertension Score Analysis: Smithdale, MS (ZIP Code 39664)

Smithdale, Mississippi, a rural community nestled in Franklin County, faces unique challenges in managing hypertension. This analysis delves into the availability of primary care physicians, the quality of hypertension management, and the integration of modern healthcare solutions within ZIP code 39664. The goal is to provide a comprehensive "Hypertension Score" assessment, considering various factors crucial for effective patient care.

The foundation of hypertension management lies in accessible primary care. Physician-to-patient ratios are a critical indicator. In Smithdale, the availability of primary care physicians is likely limited compared to urban centers. The exact ratio requires specific data analysis, but rural areas often grapple with shortages. This scarcity can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced opportunities for preventative care, and potentially delayed diagnosis and treatment of hypertension.

The quality of care also hinges on the individual practices. Identifying "standout practices" involves evaluating several elements. These include the adoption of evidence-based guidelines for hypertension management, patient education programs, and the use of electronic health records (EHRs) for efficient data tracking and medication management. Practices that prioritize patient-centered care, offer comprehensive follow-up, and demonstrate a commitment to continuous improvement would likely receive higher scores. Specific practice names and their performance require detailed investigation, but this assessment framework provides a starting point.

Telemedicine adoption is an increasingly important factor, particularly in rural areas. Telemedicine offers the potential to bridge geographical barriers and improve access to specialists and remote monitoring. Practices that utilize telemedicine for hypertension management, such as virtual consultations, remote blood pressure monitoring, and medication management, can significantly improve patient outcomes. The extent of telemedicine adoption in Smithdale requires investigation, but its potential impact on hypertension control is significant.

Mental health resources are integral to comprehensive hypertension management. Stress and anxiety can significantly impact blood pressure. The availability of mental health services, including counseling and psychiatric care, is crucial. Practices that integrate mental health screening and treatment into their hypertension management protocols demonstrate a holistic approach to patient well-being. Assessing the availability of these resources in Smithdale is essential for a complete "Hypertension Score" analysis.

The "Hypertension Score" itself would be a composite metric, reflecting the interplay of these factors. It would consider the physician-to-patient ratio, the quality of care provided by individual practices (including adherence to guidelines, patient education, and EHR utilization), the extent of telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources. The scoring system would need to be standardized and transparent, allowing for objective comparison and benchmarking.

Furthermore, the analysis would need to consider the demographics of the population served. Factors such as age, race, and socioeconomic status can influence hypertension prevalence and management. Understanding the specific needs of the Smithdale population is essential for tailoring interventions and improving patient outcomes. This data would be integrated into the "Hypertension Score" calculation to provide a more nuanced assessment.

The analysis would also examine the role of community resources and partnerships. Collaboration between healthcare providers, local pharmacies, community health centers, and public health agencies can enhance hypertension management efforts. The presence of these partnerships and their effectiveness would be considered in the overall score. This collaborative approach is crucial for creating a supportive environment for patients with hypertension.

The data collection process would involve multiple sources. Publicly available data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), and state health departments would provide valuable information. Surveys of local healthcare providers and patient interviews would offer insights into the quality of care and patient experiences. Analyzing EHR data (with appropriate privacy safeguards) could reveal patterns in medication adherence, blood pressure control, and the utilization of preventative services.

The "Hypertension Score" for Smithdale would not be a static number but a dynamic assessment. It would be updated periodically to reflect changes in healthcare delivery, new research findings, and evolving patient needs. This ongoing monitoring would allow for continuous improvement and ensure that the community's efforts to manage hypertension are effective.

The results of this analysis would be valuable for various stakeholders. Healthcare providers could use the information to identify areas for improvement and implement best practices. Public health officials could use the data to develop targeted interventions and allocate resources effectively. Patients could use the information to make informed decisions about their healthcare and advocate for their needs.

In conclusion, evaluating the "Hypertension Score" for Smithdale (ZIP Code 39664) requires a comprehensive assessment of primary care availability, quality of care, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources. This analysis provides a framework for evaluating these factors and ultimately improving hypertension management in the community. The goal is to provide a clear picture of the current state of healthcare in Smithdale and identify opportunities for positive change.

To visualize and analyze the geographic distribution of healthcare resources, including physician locations and patient demographics, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps can provide valuable insights into the challenges and opportunities facing Smithdale and other rural communities.