39743, Crawford, Mississippi Hypertension Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 39743, Crawford, Mississippi is 9 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 97.44 percent of the residents in 39743 has some form of health insurance. 56.98 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 56.68 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 39743 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 481 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 17 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 39743. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 422 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,787 health care providers accessible to residents in 39743, Crawford, Mississippi.

## Hypertension Score Analysis: Crawford, Mississippi (ZIP Code 39743)

This analysis delves into the landscape of hypertension management within Crawford, Mississippi (ZIP Code 39743), focusing on primary care availability and the resources available to patients. We aim to provide a “Hypertension Score” assessment, considering factors like physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources. The ultimate goal is to understand the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare ecosystem in addressing this critical public health concern.

The foundation of effective hypertension management lies in accessible primary care. In Crawford, the availability of primary care physicians is a crucial determinant of patient outcomes. To accurately assess the situation, we must consider the physician-to-patient ratio. This metric provides a glimpse into the potential burden on existing providers. A higher ratio, meaning fewer physicians per capita, can indicate longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and potentially compromised preventative care. Determining the precise ratio requires accessing local demographic data and cross-referencing it with physician directories. This process will help to establish a baseline understanding of the capacity of the healthcare system.

Beyond the raw numbers, the quality of primary care practices is paramount. Identifying “standout practices” necessitates a deeper dive into their operational models and patient outcomes. This involves researching patient satisfaction surveys, reviewing online ratings, and examining the types of services offered. Practices that proactively manage hypertension often employ strategies like regular blood pressure monitoring, patient education programs, and medication management protocols. They might also integrate specialized services, such as dietitians or certified diabetes educators, into their care plans. Practices that excel in these areas are likely to achieve better control rates and improve patient health.

Telemedicine adoption is another crucial factor to consider. In a rural area like Crawford, telemedicine offers a powerful tool to improve access to care. Remote consultations, medication management, and virtual monitoring can bridge geographical barriers and provide patients with convenient access to healthcare professionals. Assessing the level of telemedicine integration requires evaluating the availability of virtual appointment options, the use of remote monitoring devices, and the overall technological infrastructure of the local healthcare providers. Practices that embrace telemedicine are often better equipped to reach patients who face mobility challenges or live in remote areas.

Hypertension is often intertwined with mental health. Stress, anxiety, and depression can significantly impact blood pressure levels and overall cardiovascular health. Therefore, the integration of mental health resources into primary care is essential. This involves assessing the availability of mental health professionals, such as psychiatrists, psychologists, and therapists, within the local healthcare system. Practices that offer integrated mental health services, either through in-house providers or through referral networks, are better positioned to address the holistic needs of patients with hypertension. This integrated approach can lead to improved patient outcomes and overall well-being.

The assessment of these factors allows for a comprehensive “Hypertension Score” ranking. This ranking would reflect the overall strength of the healthcare system in managing hypertension. The score would be determined by a weighted average of the individual factors discussed above. A higher score would indicate a more robust healthcare ecosystem, with greater access to care, better-integrated services, and a higher likelihood of successful hypertension management. The score would be dynamic, allowing for periodic updates as the healthcare landscape evolves.

To refine the analysis, we would need to identify specific practices within the ZIP code. This would involve gathering data on individual practices, their services, their patient satisfaction scores, and their adoption of telemedicine and mental health integration. This information would be used to create a more granular assessment of the local healthcare ecosystem. The resulting analysis would provide valuable insights for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers.

The analysis should also consider the specific challenges faced by the Crawford community. Rural areas often face unique barriers to healthcare access, such as transportation limitations, limited internet connectivity, and a shortage of healthcare professionals. Understanding these challenges is essential for developing effective strategies to improve hypertension management. The analysis should identify these specific challenges and recommend potential solutions, such as community outreach programs, telehealth initiatives, and partnerships with local organizations.

The data collection phase would involve a combination of primary and secondary research. Primary research would involve contacting local healthcare providers, conducting patient surveys, and gathering data on practice operations. Secondary research would involve reviewing online resources, such as physician directories, patient reviews, and government health data. The data would be analyzed using statistical methods to identify trends and patterns.

The findings of the analysis would be presented in a clear and concise format. The “Hypertension Score” ranking would be prominently displayed, along with supporting data and analysis. The report would also include recommendations for improving hypertension management in Crawford. The recommendations would be tailored to the specific challenges faced by the community.

The ultimate goal of this analysis is to empower patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers with the information they need to improve hypertension management in Crawford, Mississippi. By providing a comprehensive assessment of the local healthcare ecosystem, we can help to create a healthier community.

For a visual representation of the healthcare landscape in Crawford, Mississippi, including the location of primary care providers, the availability of resources, and the distribution of patient populations, consider using CartoChrome maps. Explore the interactive maps and gain a deeper understanding of the area's healthcare resources.