Hypertension Score

27021, King, North Carolina Hypertension Score Provider Score

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 stars

0 Reviews

Health Scores

Provider Score in 27021, King, North Carolina

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 27021, King, North Carolina is 98 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 85.68 percent of the residents in 27021 has some form of health insurance. 39.32 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 63.89 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 27021 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 3,262 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 27021. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 3,223 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 3,801 health care providers accessible to residents in 27021, King, North Carolina.

Health Scores in 27021, King, North Carolina

Hypertension Score 58
People Score 26
Provider Score 98
Hospital Score 35
Travel Score 44

Provider Type in a 20-Mile Radius

27021 King North Carolina
Providers per 10,000 residents 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 0.00 0.00 0.00

Provider Score Review of 27021, King, North Carolina

## Hypertension Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 27021 & Primary Care in King

Analyzing healthcare accessibility and quality within ZIP code 27021 (King, North Carolina) necessitates a multi-faceted approach, particularly concerning hypertension management. This analysis will explore the availability and performance of primary care physicians, focusing on factors relevant to hypertension control, including physician-to-patient ratios, notable practices, telemedicine integration, and the presence of mental health resources. This will then be contextualized within the broader framework of primary care availability in the town of King.

The physician-to-patient ratio is a fundamental indicator of access. In 27021, and indeed in many rural areas, a lower ratio (fewer patients per physician) is desirable. Data collection from sources like the North Carolina Medical Board and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is crucial. The analysis would involve identifying the number of active primary care physicians practicing within the ZIP code and comparing this to the estimated population. This ratio directly impacts appointment wait times, the ability to establish a strong patient-physician relationship (critical for chronic disease management), and the overall capacity to provide timely and effective care. A high ratio suggests potential challenges in accessing timely care, which can negatively impact hypertension control.

Identifying standout practices within 27021 is essential. These practices often demonstrate best practices in hypertension management. This analysis would involve examining factors such as patient outcomes (e.g., percentage of patients with controlled blood pressure), adherence to evidence-based guidelines (e.g., the American Heart Association guidelines), and patient satisfaction scores. Practices that actively implement strategies like regular blood pressure monitoring, patient education programs, and medication management protocols would be considered high-performing. Further investigation might reveal practices that have adopted innovative approaches to hypertension management, such as specialized clinics or programs tailored to specific patient populations.

Telemedicine adoption has become increasingly important, especially in rural areas. The analysis would investigate the extent to which primary care physicians in 27021 offer telemedicine services. This includes virtual consultations, remote blood pressure monitoring, and medication management through telehealth platforms. Practices with robust telemedicine programs can improve access to care, particularly for patients with mobility limitations or those living in remote areas. The effectiveness of these programs, measured by patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes, would be a key factor in evaluating their impact on hypertension control.

The crucial link between mental health and hypertension necessitates an examination of mental health resources available to patients in 27021. The analysis would identify whether primary care practices offer integrated behavioral health services or have established referral pathways to mental health professionals. This includes access to therapists, psychiatrists, and support groups. Addressing mental health issues, such as stress and anxiety, which can contribute to elevated blood pressure, is crucial for comprehensive hypertension management. Practices that prioritize mental health integration are likely to provide more holistic and effective care.

The broader context of primary care availability in the town of King is also critical. This analysis would assess the overall density of primary care providers within the town, considering factors such as geographic distribution and accessibility. Are there underserved areas within King where access to primary care is limited? The presence of community health centers or other safety-net providers would be evaluated. The availability of specialized services, such as cardiology and nephrology, is also important, as these specialists play a crucial role in managing complex hypertension cases.

The analysis would also consider the demographics of the population in 27021. The prevalence of hypertension varies across different demographic groups. Factors such as age, race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status can influence the risk of developing hypertension and the ability to access and afford care. Understanding the specific needs of the population is essential for tailoring hypertension management strategies.

Data collection and analysis would involve a combination of methods. Publicly available data sources, such as the CMS Physician Compare website and the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, would be utilized. Surveys of primary care practices within 27021 would be conducted to gather information on their services, staffing, and patient outcomes. Patient satisfaction surveys and focus groups could provide valuable insights into the patient experience. This data would be compiled and analyzed to generate a comprehensive hypertension score ranking for primary care physicians in the area.

The final hypertension score ranking would provide a valuable tool for patients seeking primary care in 27021. It would highlight practices that are excelling in hypertension management and identify areas where improvements are needed. This information could empower patients to make informed decisions about their healthcare and encourage practices to adopt best practices. The ranking could also be used by healthcare providers, policymakers, and community organizations to identify opportunities for improving access to care and promoting hypertension control in the region.

The analysis would also highlight any gaps in the system, such as a lack of mental health resources or limited telemedicine adoption. This information could be used to advocate for policy changes and resource allocation to address these gaps. The ultimate goal is to improve the health and well-being of residents in 27021 by ensuring that they have access to high-quality primary care that effectively manages hypertension.

The findings of this analysis could be used to create interactive maps visualizing the distribution of primary care physicians, the availability of specialized services, and the prevalence of hypertension in different areas of King. This would provide a powerful tool for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers to understand the healthcare landscape and identify areas where resources are most needed.

Ready to visualize the healthcare landscape in King, NC? Explore the power of data with interactive maps. Discover physician locations, patient demographics, and resource availability. **Click here to access CartoChrome maps and gain a deeper understanding of healthcare accessibility in your community.**

Reviews

Recent Reviews

No reviews yet.

Leave a review
Health Scores Near 27021, King, North Carolina

You may also like

27050, Tobaccoville, North Carolina
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 27021: 5.93 Miles

Total Population:

27043, Pinnacle, North Carolina
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 27021: 6.20 Miles

Total Population:

27045, Rural Hall, North Carolina
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 27021: 6.31 Miles

Total Population:

27019, Germanton, North Carolina
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 27021: 6.50 Miles

Total Population:

27040, Pfafftown, North Carolina
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 27021: 9.53 Miles

Total Population:

27053, Westfield, North Carolina
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 27021: 10.16 Miles

Total Population:

27041, Pilot Mountain, North Carolina
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 27021: 10.37 Miles

Total Population:

27052, Walnut Cove, North Carolina
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 27021: 10.96 Miles

Total Population:

27016, Danbury, North Carolina
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 27021: 11.62 Miles

Total Population:

Health Scores in 27021, King, North Carolina