27025, Madison, North Carolina Hypertension Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 27025, Madison, North Carolina is 16 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 90.13 percent of the residents in 27025 has some form of health insurance. 41.29 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 68.19 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 27025 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 2,556 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 27025. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,211 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 341 health care providers accessible to residents in 27025, Madison, North Carolina.

The task is to analyze hypertension care within ZIP code 27025, focusing on primary care availability in Madison, North Carolina. This analysis will produce a “Hypertension Score,” though the actual scoring system is not explicitly defined. The analysis will delve into physician-to-patient ratios, highlight standout practices, assess telemedicine adoption, and consider mental health resources.

Madison, North Carolina, nestled within ZIP code 27025, presents a unique challenge for healthcare delivery. The rural nature of the area, combined with potential socioeconomic factors, can significantly impact access to quality primary care, a crucial element in managing hypertension. A comprehensive “Hypertension Score” requires evaluating several interconnected factors.

One of the most fundamental aspects to consider is the physician-to-patient ratio. A low ratio, indicating a scarcity of primary care physicians, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and potentially, delayed diagnoses or inadequate management of hypertension. The actual physician-to-patient ratio in 27025 must be determined. This would require data collection from sources like the North Carolina Medical Board, local hospitals, and potentially, insurance provider networks. The number of practicing primary care physicians, including family medicine, internal medicine, and general practitioners, must be identified and compared against the estimated population of the ZIP code. A lower ratio would negatively impact the Hypertension Score.

Beyond raw numbers, the distribution of physicians within the ZIP code is also important. Are the physicians concentrated in a single clinic or hospital, or are they spread throughout the community? This distribution affects accessibility, particularly for patients with limited transportation options or mobility challenges. The geographic accessibility of primary care practices significantly influences the ability of patients to adhere to treatment plans and regularly monitor their blood pressure.

Identifying “standout practices” is crucial. These are primary care facilities demonstrating excellence in hypertension management. This requires a deeper dive into practice characteristics. Are these practices using evidence-based guidelines for hypertension treatment, such as those from the American Heart Association or the American College of Cardiology? Do they employ a team-based approach, involving nurses, medical assistants, and potentially, pharmacists, to provide comprehensive care? Do they have systems in place for regular blood pressure monitoring, medication adherence support, and patient education? Practices that actively engage in these practices would positively impact the Hypertension Score.

Telemedicine adoption is another critical element. Telemedicine, including video consultations, remote blood pressure monitoring, and online patient portals, can improve access to care, especially for patients in rural areas. Practices that have embraced telemedicine can potentially improve their Hypertension Score. The availability of telemedicine services can overcome geographical barriers and allow for more frequent monitoring and follow-up, which are essential for effective hypertension management. The degree of telemedicine adoption, including the types of services offered and the patient utilization rates, must be assessed.

The interplay between hypertension and mental health is well-documented. Chronic stress, anxiety, and depression can negatively impact blood pressure control. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources within the community significantly impacts the Hypertension Score. The presence of mental health providers, such as psychiatrists, psychologists, and licensed clinical social workers, is a crucial consideration. Are these providers readily accessible to patients in 27025? Do primary care practices have established referral pathways to mental health services? The integration of mental health care into primary care, or the ease of access to such services, would improve the overall score.

The availability of support groups, educational programs, and community resources related to hypertension management also needs consideration. These resources can empower patients to take an active role in managing their health, leading to better outcomes. Are there community health programs that offer blood pressure screenings, education on healthy lifestyles, and support for medication adherence? The presence and accessibility of such resources would positively impact the Hypertension Score.

The quality of the healthcare infrastructure within 27025 also needs to be assessed. The availability of diagnostic equipment, such as blood pressure monitors and laboratory services, within primary care practices is essential for accurate diagnosis and monitoring. The proximity of hospitals and specialty care providers, such as cardiologists, is also important, particularly for patients with complex cases or complications related to hypertension.

The “Hypertension Score” would be a composite of these factors, weighted according to their relative importance. The physician-to-patient ratio, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources would all contribute to the final score. The score would provide a snapshot of the quality of hypertension care available in 27025.

The final Hypertension Score could be further refined by incorporating data on patient outcomes. This could include metrics such as blood pressure control rates, rates of cardiovascular events (heart attack, stroke), and patient satisfaction scores. However, accessing and analyzing this type of data requires significant resources and data privacy considerations.

In conclusion, assessing hypertension care in 27025 requires a multi-faceted approach. The analysis must consider physician availability, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and community support. This detailed assessment, combined with the data on patient outcomes, would provide a comprehensive understanding of the challenges and opportunities for improving hypertension management in Madison, North Carolina.

For those interested in visualizing the geographic distribution of these healthcare resources and understanding the spatial relationships between patients and providers, consider using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can provide valuable insights into access to care and help identify areas where resources are needed most.