The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 27298, Liberty, North Carolina is 73 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 82.62 percent of the residents in 27298 has some form of health insurance. 45.13 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 49.10 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 27298 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 2,464 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 27298. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,007 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,942 health care providers accessible to residents in 27298, Liberty, North Carolina.
Health Scores in 27298, Liberty, North Carolina
Hypertension Score | 24 |
---|---|
People Score | 20 |
Provider Score | 73 |
Hospital Score | 17 |
Travel Score | 44 |
27298 | Liberty | North Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis of hypertension management capabilities in Liberty, North Carolina (ZIP Code 27298), requires a multi-faceted approach, considering physician availability, practice characteristics, and the integration of supportive resources. This analysis aims to provide a comprehensive "Hypertension Score" assessment, focusing on key factors influencing patient care.
The first critical element is physician-to-patient ratio. Determining the exact number of primary care physicians (PCPs) actively practicing within 27298 and the surrounding areas is crucial. This involves cross-referencing data from the North Carolina Medical Board, insurance provider directories, and potentially, local hospital affiliations. A low physician-to-patient ratio (e.g., a high number of patients per PCP) can indicate potential challenges in accessing timely appointments and comprehensive care. Conversely, a favorable ratio suggests greater accessibility. This ratio directly impacts a patient’s ability to receive regular check-ups, medication management, and lifestyle counseling, all essential for hypertension control.
Primary care availability extends beyond sheer numbers. The presence of practices accepting new patients is paramount. Many practices may be at capacity, making it difficult for new residents or those seeking a new PCP to establish care. The analysis must identify practices actively accepting new patients, and those with shorter wait times for appointments. Furthermore, the availability of extended hours, weekend appointments, and walk-in options can significantly improve patient access and adherence to treatment plans.
Standout practices within the area deserve specific attention. These practices often demonstrate exemplary hypertension management strategies. This includes assessing the use of electronic health records (EHRs) for tracking patient data, medication adherence, and blood pressure readings. Practices utilizing standardized protocols for hypertension screening, diagnosis, and treatment, based on current guidelines from the American Heart Association (AHA) and the American College of Cardiology (ACC), should be highlighted. These protocols ensure consistent and evidence-based care.
Telemedicine adoption is another critical factor. The ability to offer virtual consultations and remote patient monitoring (RPM) can greatly improve access to care, particularly for patients with mobility issues, transportation challenges, or those living in rural areas. Practices utilizing telemedicine platforms for follow-up appointments, medication refills, and educational sessions should be recognized. The adoption of RPM, where patients can remotely transmit blood pressure readings and other vital signs, allows for proactive management and early intervention.
The integration of mental health resources is often overlooked but is a vital component of comprehensive hypertension management. Chronic stress and mental health conditions, such as anxiety and depression, can significantly impact blood pressure. Practices that offer or have established referral pathways to mental health professionals (therapists, psychiatrists) demonstrate a holistic approach to patient care. The presence of on-site mental health services or partnerships with local mental health providers should be assessed.
Furthermore, access to other supportive services, such as registered dietitians, certified diabetes educators, and smoking cessation programs, contributes to a more comprehensive approach. These services can help patients adopt healthy lifestyle changes, which are essential for managing hypertension. Practices that actively promote and integrate these services into their care plans should be recognized.
The analysis must also consider the quality of care provided. This involves assessing patient outcomes, such as the percentage of patients with controlled blood pressure, the rates of hospitalizations related to hypertension, and patient satisfaction scores. While obtaining this data can be challenging, it is crucial for a comprehensive assessment of practice performance. Data from insurance providers, quality reporting programs, and patient surveys can provide valuable insights.
The "Hypertension Score" for each practice could be calculated based on a weighted system. Factors such as physician-to-patient ratio, acceptance of new patients, telemedicine adoption, mental health integration, and the availability of supportive services would be assigned specific weights. The practice's performance on these factors would determine its overall score.
This assessment should also consider potential disparities in access to care. Are there specific populations within 27298 who face greater challenges in accessing hypertension management services? Factors such as socioeconomic status, race, and ethnicity can influence access to care. The analysis should identify any disparities and highlight practices that are actively working to address them.
The evaluation of practices should also consider the use of patient education materials. Providing patients with clear and concise information about hypertension, its management, and the importance of lifestyle changes is crucial. Practices that provide educational materials in multiple languages and at various literacy levels demonstrate a commitment to patient empowerment.
Finally, the analysis should be dynamic and updated regularly. The healthcare landscape is constantly evolving, with new technologies, treatment guidelines, and best practices emerging. Regular updates ensure that the "Hypertension Score" remains relevant and reflects the current state of hypertension management in Liberty.
For a visual representation of this data, including practice locations, physician availability, and the distribution of resources, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome provides interactive mapping tools that can help you visualize the "Hypertension Score" data and identify areas with the greatest needs. This can assist in making informed decisions about healthcare access and resource allocation.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like