27568, Pine Level, North Carolina Hypertension Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 27568, Pine Level, North Carolina is 12 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 88.91 percent of the residents in 27568 has some form of health insurance. 43.29 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 59.03 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 27568 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 459 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 3 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 27568. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 204 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 4,285 health care providers accessible to residents in 27568, Pine Level, North Carolina.

## Hypertension Score Analysis: Pine Level, NC (ZIP Code 27568)

Analyzing the landscape of hypertension care within Pine Level, North Carolina (ZIP code 27568) requires a multi-faceted approach. This analysis, aiming to provide a "Hypertension Score" ranking, considers several key factors: the availability of primary care physicians, physician-to-patient ratios, the adoption of telemedicine, the integration of mental health resources, and the overall quality of care, all within the context of managing hypertension. This is not a simple numerical score but rather a qualitative assessment, considering the complexities of healthcare delivery in a rural setting.

Pine Level, like many rural communities, likely faces challenges regarding healthcare access. A significant factor influencing the Hypertension Score is the density of primary care physicians. A low physician-to-patient ratio, indicating fewer doctors per capita, often translates to longer wait times for appointments, potentially delaying crucial hypertension management and follow-up care. The availability of specialists, such as cardiologists and nephrologists, is also critical, as these specialists play a vital role in managing complex cases and preventing complications.

Assessing the quality of primary care practices involves looking beyond just the number of physicians. We must consider the practices’ commitment to evidence-based guidelines for hypertension management. This includes regular blood pressure monitoring, lifestyle counseling (diet, exercise, and smoking cessation), and medication adherence support. The use of electronic health records (EHRs) is also crucial, enabling better coordination of care, improved tracking of patient data, and streamlined communication between providers. The practices' adherence to these guidelines directly impacts the effectiveness of hypertension treatment and, consequently, the overall Hypertension Score.

Standout practices within Pine Level would demonstrate a proactive approach to hypertension management. This could involve implementing patient outreach programs to identify individuals at risk, offering comprehensive education on lifestyle modifications, and providing readily accessible resources for medication management. Practices that prioritize patient education and empowerment, enabling individuals to actively participate in their care, will likely achieve better outcomes and contribute to a higher Hypertension Score.

Telemedicine adoption is another crucial element. Telemedicine offers a powerful tool to overcome geographical barriers and improve access to care, especially in rural areas like Pine Level. Practices utilizing telehealth for virtual consultations, remote blood pressure monitoring, and medication refills can significantly enhance the accessibility of hypertension management. The ability to connect patients with specialists remotely can also improve the quality of care, particularly for complex cases. The degree to which practices have embraced telemedicine, and the integration of these technologies into their workflows, will be factored into the overall assessment.

The link between hypertension and mental health is well-established. Chronic stress and anxiety can contribute to elevated blood pressure, and individuals with hypertension are often at increased risk for mental health challenges. Therefore, the integration of mental health resources within primary care practices is essential for comprehensive hypertension management. Practices that offer on-site mental health services, or have established referral networks with mental health professionals, demonstrate a commitment to holistic patient care. The availability of these resources will contribute positively to the Hypertension Score.

The overall quality of care is not solely determined by the availability of resources. It's also about the patient experience. Practices that prioritize patient communication, build strong patient-provider relationships, and provide a supportive environment for managing hypertension are more likely to achieve positive outcomes. This includes clear and concise communication about treatment plans, addressing patient concerns effectively, and fostering a sense of trust and collaboration. Patient satisfaction surveys and feedback mechanisms can provide valuable insights into the quality of care and contribute to a more nuanced Hypertension Score assessment.

Further complicating the assessment is the potential for insurance coverage variations. Access to affordable medications and specialist consultations can be significantly impacted by insurance plans. Practices that actively assist patients in navigating insurance complexities, including medication assistance programs, demonstrate a commitment to patient well-being and contribute to a better Hypertension Score. The ability to address socioeconomic factors that affect health outcomes is a crucial component of effective care.

In conclusion, assessing the Hypertension Score for doctors in ZIP code 27568 requires a comprehensive evaluation. This assessment considers physician availability, practice quality, telemedicine adoption, mental health integration, and patient experience. The overall score is not a simple ranking but a nuanced understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare landscape in Pine Level. While this analysis provides a general overview, further investigation and data collection are necessary for a more precise and actionable assessment.

For a more detailed visual representation of healthcare resources in Pine Level, including physician locations, clinic details, and potential areas of need, consider exploring CartoChrome maps.