The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 27938, Gatesville, North Carolina is 17 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 91.47 percent of the residents in 27938 has some form of health insurance. 46.76 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 61.40 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 27938 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 330 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 27938. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 301 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 485 health care providers accessible to residents in 27938, Gatesville, North Carolina.
Health Scores in 27938, Gatesville, North Carolina
Hypertension Score | 23 |
---|---|
People Score | 71 |
Provider Score | 17 |
Hospital Score | 45 |
Travel Score | 18 |
27938 | Gatesville | North Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis focuses on evaluating hypertension management capabilities within the confines of ZIP Code 27938, specifically examining primary care availability in Gatesville, North Carolina. A comprehensive 'Hypertension Score' is constructed, considering factors such as physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of exemplary practices, the adoption of telemedicine technologies, and the integration of mental health resources. This score aims to provide a nuanced understanding of the healthcare landscape for hypertension patients in the area, allowing for informed decisions and targeted improvements.
The foundation of this analysis lies in assessing the physician-to-patient ratio. A low ratio, indicating a higher concentration of patients per physician, can potentially hinder timely appointments, comprehensive follow-up care, and personalized treatment plans. Conversely, a favorable ratio suggests increased accessibility and a greater opportunity for physicians to dedicate sufficient time to each patient. Accurate data on physician counts, including primary care physicians (PCPs), cardiologists, and other specialists involved in hypertension management, is crucial. This data, coupled with the population of Gatesville, allows for the calculation of the ratio, providing a fundamental metric for evaluating access to care.
Examining standout practices within the ZIP Code is essential. Identifying clinics and medical centers that demonstrate excellence in hypertension management requires a deep dive into their operational procedures, patient outcomes, and adherence to clinical guidelines. Key indicators include the implementation of evidence-based protocols for diagnosis, treatment, and ongoing monitoring. The use of electronic health records (EHRs) for efficient data management and patient communication is also critical. Practices that actively engage in patient education programs, offering resources on lifestyle modifications such as diet, exercise, and stress management, are highly valued. Furthermore, the presence of dedicated hypertension specialists or clinics specializing in cardiovascular health significantly elevates a practice’s score.
Telemedicine adoption is a significant factor in the modern healthcare landscape. The ability to offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and medication management through telemedicine platforms enhances accessibility, especially for patients in rural areas. Telemedicine reduces the need for frequent in-person visits, saving time and travel costs. Practices that embrace telemedicine demonstrate a commitment to patient convenience and proactive care. The availability of remote blood pressure monitoring devices and the integration of these readings into the patient's EHR further enhance the effectiveness of telemedicine programs. The 'Hypertension Score' gives considerable weight to the utilization of telemedicine tools.
The intricate connection between hypertension and mental health necessitates a comprehensive approach. Chronic stress, anxiety, and depression can significantly impact blood pressure levels and treatment adherence. Primary care practices that integrate mental health resources into their hypertension management programs receive higher scores. This includes the availability of on-site therapists, psychiatrists, or referrals to mental health specialists. The implementation of screening tools for mental health conditions and the coordination of care between primary care physicians and mental health professionals are crucial. Practices that prioritize the emotional well-being of their patients alongside their physical health demonstrate a holistic approach to care.
The 'Hypertension Score' also assesses the availability of ancillary services, such as on-site pharmacies for medication dispensing and laboratory services for blood work. These services streamline the patient experience and improve convenience. Practices that offer these services, or have strong partnerships with local pharmacies and labs, receive higher scores. The availability of language services for non-English speaking patients and the accessibility of the practice for individuals with disabilities are also factored into the evaluation.
Gathering data for this analysis requires multiple sources. Publicly available data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, and professional medical organizations provides valuable insights. Local hospital websites, clinic directories, and physician profiles offer information on services and specialties. Patient reviews and testimonials, while subjective, can provide valuable qualitative data on patient experiences. The analysis also considers the geographic distribution of healthcare resources within the ZIP Code, ensuring equitable access to care for all residents of Gatesville.
The final 'Hypertension Score' is a composite measure, reflecting the weighted average of the various factors discussed. Each factor is assigned a specific weight based on its importance in hypertension management. The physician-to-patient ratio, for example, might carry a higher weight than the availability of on-site pharmacies. The score is presented on a scale, allowing for a clear comparison of the healthcare landscape in Gatesville. The score is categorized into tiers, such as 'Excellent,' 'Good,' 'Fair,' and 'Poor,' providing a concise summary of the overall quality of hypertension care.
The analysis concludes with specific recommendations for improvement. These recommendations are tailored to the findings of the 'Hypertension Score' and are aimed at enhancing the quality of hypertension care in Gatesville. These may include suggestions for increasing physician recruitment, expanding telemedicine services, integrating mental health resources, and implementing evidence-based clinical protocols. The goal is to provide actionable insights that can be used to improve patient outcomes and promote a healthier community.
The analysis highlights the importance of data visualization in understanding complex healthcare information. Mapping the distribution of healthcare resources, patient demographics, and health outcomes provides valuable insights. CartoChrome maps can be used to create interactive visualizations that allow for a deeper exploration of the data. These maps can be used to identify areas with limited access to care, target interventions, and track progress over time.
Ready to visualize the healthcare landscape of Gatesville and gain a deeper understanding of hypertension management? Contact CartoChrome maps today to explore how their data visualization tools can provide valuable insights and support informed decision-making.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like