Hypertension Score

28071, Gold Hill, North Carolina Hypertension Score Provider Score

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 stars

0 Reviews

Health Scores

Provider Score in 28071, Gold Hill, North Carolina

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 28071, Gold Hill, North Carolina is 63 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 87.15 percent of the residents in 28071 has some form of health insurance. 36.23 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 66.79 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28071 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 524 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 39 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28071. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 402 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 10,323 health care providers accessible to residents in 28071, Gold Hill, North Carolina.

Health Scores in 28071, Gold Hill, North Carolina

Hypertension Score 52
People Score 45
Provider Score 63
Hospital Score 38
Travel Score 49

Provider Type in a 20-Mile Radius

28071 Gold Hill North Carolina
Providers per 10,000 residents 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 0.00 0.00 0.00

Provider Score Review of 28071, Gold Hill, North Carolina

**Hypertension Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 28071 and Primary Care Availability in Gold Hill**

This analysis delves into the landscape of hypertension management within ZIP Code 28071, focusing on the availability and quality of primary care, with specific attention given to the town of Gold Hill. The goal is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the resources available to patients managing hypertension, including physician-to-patient ratios, notable practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health resources. The findings will be synthesized into a hypothetical "Hypertension Score," offering insights into the overall effectiveness of hypertension care in this specific geographic area.

The foundation of effective hypertension management rests upon accessible and high-quality primary care. In the context of 28071, this involves assessing the density of primary care physicians (PCPs) relative to the population. Accurate physician-to-patient ratios are critical. A higher ratio, meaning more patients per physician, can potentially lead to longer wait times for appointments and reduced time spent with each patient, potentially impacting the quality of care. Data from sources like the US Census Bureau, combined with information from medical directories and insurance provider networks, are crucial for determining this ratio. The ideal ratio is dynamic, influenced by factors like the age and health profile of the population.

Gold Hill, a town within 28071, warrants specific attention. Its rural nature may present unique challenges in accessing primary care. Transportation limitations, a potentially older demographic, and the potential for fewer medical facilities could all contribute to lower access to care. A thorough analysis would involve identifying the number of PCPs physically located within Gold Hill, alongside the geographic distribution of patients. This would reveal the extent of any "care deserts" and inform strategies to improve accessibility.

Beyond the raw numbers of physicians, the quality of care is paramount. Certain practices within 28071 may stand out for their commitment to hypertension management. This can be assessed by examining factors such as the use of evidence-based guidelines, patient education programs, and the integration of technology. Practices that actively monitor patient blood pressure, provide personalized treatment plans, and offer support for lifestyle modifications (diet, exercise, stress management) would likely receive higher marks. Patient reviews and satisfaction surveys also offer valuable insights into the patient experience and the perceived quality of care.

The adoption of telemedicine is another critical factor in evaluating hypertension care. Telemedicine offers significant advantages, particularly for patients in rural areas or those with mobility limitations. Remote blood pressure monitoring, virtual consultations, and medication management through telehealth platforms can improve patient adherence to treatment plans and reduce the need for frequent in-person visits. Practices that have embraced telemedicine and integrated it seamlessly into their workflow are likely to provide more accessible and convenient care.

The relationship between hypertension and mental health is well-established. Chronic stress and anxiety can significantly impact blood pressure, and conversely, the diagnosis and management of hypertension can contribute to emotional distress. Therefore, the integration of mental health resources into primary care is crucial. Practices that offer on-site counseling services, referrals to mental health professionals, or educational programs addressing stress management and coping mechanisms are better equipped to provide holistic care. The availability of these resources within 28071, particularly in Gold Hill, is a key factor in the Hypertension Score.

The hypothetical "Hypertension Score" would be a composite metric, reflecting the various factors discussed above. It would consider the physician-to-patient ratio, the presence of standout practices with a focus on hypertension management, the adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health resources. The score could be presented on a scale, allowing for comparison across different areas or practices. A higher score would indicate a more favorable environment for hypertension management, with greater access to care, higher quality services, and a more holistic approach to patient well-being.

The analysis of 28071 would involve a detailed review of available data. This includes information from the North Carolina Medical Board, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), and local healthcare providers. Data on the use of electronic health records (EHRs), patient outcomes, and adherence to clinical guidelines would be particularly valuable. This data would be supplemented by site visits, interviews with healthcare professionals, and patient surveys to gain a comprehensive understanding of the current landscape.

The evaluation of primary care availability in Gold Hill requires a more granular approach. This involves mapping the location of medical facilities, identifying transportation options, and assessing the demographics of the population. The analysis would also consider the availability of community resources, such as pharmacies, support groups, and health education programs.

The final Hypertension Score would be presented with clear explanations of the methodology and the data sources used. The score would be accompanied by recommendations for improvement, such as expanding telemedicine services, increasing the availability of mental health resources, and implementing evidence-based hypertension management protocols. The goal is to provide actionable insights that can be used to improve the quality of care for patients with hypertension in 28071 and Gold Hill.

In conclusion, the landscape of hypertension management in 28071, including Gold Hill, is complex, encompassing physician availability, quality of care, technology adoption, and mental health integration. A comprehensive analysis, culminating in a "Hypertension Score," provides a valuable framework for assessing the current state of care and identifying opportunities for improvement. This analysis is critical for improving the health outcomes of the residents of 28071.

For a visual representation of this data, including geographic mapping of physician locations, patient demographics, and access to care, explore the power of CartoChrome maps. Their interactive platform allows for a dynamic and informative visualization of the key elements discussed in this analysis.

Reviews

Recent Reviews

No reviews yet.

Leave a review
Health Scores Near 28071, Gold Hill, North Carolina

You may also like

28109, Misenheimer, North Carolina
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 28071: 3.15 Miles

Total Population:

28072, Granite Quarry, North Carolina
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 28071: 9.70 Miles

Total Population:

28039, East Spencer, North Carolina
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 28071: 13.31 Miles

Total Population:

28083, Kannapolis, North Carolina
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 28071: 15.58 Miles

Total Population:

28025, Concord, North Carolina
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 28071: 15.65 Miles

Total Population:

28023, China Grove, North Carolina
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 28071: 15.72 Miles

Total Population:

28088, Landis, North Carolina
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 28071: 16.37 Miles

Total Population:

28097, Locust, North Carolina
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 28071: 17.17 Miles

Total Population:

28081, Kannapolis, North Carolina
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 28071: 18.29 Miles

Total Population:

Health Scores in 28071, Gold Hill, North Carolina