Hypertension Score

28089, Lattimore, North Carolina Hypertension Score Provider Score

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 stars

0 Reviews

Health Scores

Provider Score in 28089, Lattimore, North Carolina

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 28089, Lattimore, North Carolina is 44 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 28089 has some form of health insurance. 14.97 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 86.83 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28089 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 36 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28089. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 25 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,019 health care providers accessible to residents in 28089, Lattimore, North Carolina.

Health Scores in 28089, Lattimore, North Carolina

Hypertension Score 75
People Score 93
Provider Score 44
Hospital Score 64
Travel Score 28

Provider Type in a 20-Mile Radius

28089 Lattimore North Carolina
Providers per 10,000 residents 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 0.00 0.00 0.00

Provider Score Review of 28089, Lattimore, North Carolina

The analysis below provides a hypertension score assessment for primary care physicians within ZIP code 28089, focusing on their ability to manage hypertension effectively. This assessment considers factors relevant to patient care, including physician-to-patient ratios, the availability of primary care in the nearby community of Lattimore, adoption of telemedicine, and the presence of mental health resources.

Assessing the landscape of healthcare in a specific geographic area requires a multi-faceted approach. The first element to consider is the physician-to-patient ratio. This metric provides insight into the potential workload of primary care physicians within 28089. A high ratio, indicating a large number of patients per physician, can potentially lead to shorter appointment times and less individualized care, which could negatively impact hypertension management. Conversely, a lower ratio suggests physicians may have more time to dedicate to each patient, allowing for more comprehensive assessments, education, and follow-up, all critical components of successful hypertension control. Data from the North Carolina Medical Board and the American Medical Association would be valuable resources for obtaining this information.

The availability of primary care in the neighboring community of Lattimore is also a significant factor. If Lattimore has limited access to primary care, residents of 28089 may experience increased demand on the local healthcare system. This could further strain physician resources and potentially impact the quality of care provided to patients with hypertension. Investigating the number of primary care practices, the types of services offered, and the wait times for appointments in Lattimore is essential for a comprehensive assessment.

Beyond physician availability, the adoption of telemedicine by practices within 28089 plays a crucial role in hypertension management. Telemedicine offers several advantages, including increased patient access to care, particularly for those with mobility issues or transportation challenges. Remote blood pressure monitoring, virtual consultations, and medication management through telemedicine platforms can significantly improve patient adherence to treatment plans and facilitate timely interventions. Practices actively utilizing telemedicine technologies are likely to receive a higher score in this assessment. Conversely, practices that have not embraced telemedicine may be less accessible to patients, potentially hindering effective hypertension control.

Another critical component of this assessment is the availability of mental health resources. Hypertension is often linked to stress and anxiety, and untreated mental health conditions can negatively impact a patient's ability to manage their blood pressure effectively. Primary care practices that offer on-site mental health services or have strong referral networks to mental health professionals are better equipped to provide comprehensive care. This integrated approach allows for a more holistic approach to patient well-being, leading to improved outcomes for individuals with hypertension. Practices with robust mental health support systems would receive a higher score in this analysis.

Identifying standout practices within 28089 requires a deeper dive into their specific offerings and patient outcomes. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to patient education, provide comprehensive hypertension management programs, and consistently achieve positive patient outcomes should be recognized. This could involve analyzing patient satisfaction surveys, reviewing clinical data, and assessing the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for hypertension treatment. Practices that actively participate in quality improvement initiatives and demonstrate a commitment to continuous learning are likely to provide superior care.

The assessment should also consider the use of technology and data analytics. Practices that utilize electronic health records (EHRs) effectively to track patient progress, identify at-risk individuals, and personalize treatment plans are better positioned to manage hypertension effectively. Data analytics can be used to identify trends, assess the effectiveness of interventions, and improve patient outcomes. Practices that embrace technology and data-driven decision-making should be recognized for their commitment to innovation and patient-centered care.

The specific scoring system would need to be developed based on the availability of data and the relative importance of each factor. A weighted scoring system could be used to reflect the importance of each element. For example, physician-to-patient ratio might be weighted at 15%, telemedicine adoption at 25%, mental health resources at 20%, patient outcomes at 30%, and practice infrastructure at 10%. This would allow for a more nuanced assessment of each practice.

The final 'Hypertension Score' for each practice would be a composite score based on the weighted assessment of these factors. Practices with higher scores would be considered to provide superior care for patients with hypertension. This assessment should be regularly updated to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape and the evolving needs of the community.

The assessment should also include a review of the specific medications and treatment protocols employed by each practice. Adherence to evidence-based guidelines for hypertension management, including the use of appropriate medications and lifestyle interventions, is essential for achieving optimal patient outcomes. Practices that follow these guidelines and demonstrate a commitment to patient education and self-management support should receive a higher score.

The final report should be presented in a clear and concise manner, with an emphasis on actionable insights. It should identify the strengths and weaknesses of each practice and provide recommendations for improvement. The report should also be made available to patients, healthcare providers, and other stakeholders to promote transparency and improve the quality of care.

The use of mapping tools is also crucial for visualizing the geographic distribution of healthcare resources and identifying areas with limited access to care. Mapping tools can be used to overlay data on physician density, patient demographics, and health outcomes, providing a comprehensive view of the healthcare landscape.

To further enhance your understanding of healthcare access and physician distribution within ZIP code 28089 and the surrounding areas, we encourage you to explore the power of CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome offers interactive visualizations of geographic data, allowing you to explore physician locations, patient demographics, and other relevant information in a dynamic and engaging way. Click here to access the CartoChrome maps and gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in your community.

Reviews

Recent Reviews

No reviews yet.

Leave a review
Health Scores Near 28089, Lattimore, North Carolina

You may also like

28040, Ellenboro, North Carolina
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 28089: 4.00 Miles

Total Population:

28114, Mooresboro, North Carolina
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 28089: 6.01 Miles

Total Population:

28076, Henrietta, North Carolina
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 28089: 6.09 Miles

Total Population:

28043, Forest City, North Carolina
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 28089: 8.71 Miles

Total Population:

28090, Lawndale, North Carolina
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 28089: 12.63 Miles

Total Population:

28073, Grover, North Carolina
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 28089: 15.89 Miles

Total Population:

28139, Rutherfordton, North Carolina
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 28089: 15.90 Miles

Total Population:

28086, Kings Mountain, North Carolina
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 28089: 20.26 Miles

Total Population:

28052, Gastonia, North Carolina
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 28089: 28.59 Miles

Total Population:

Health Scores in 28089, Lattimore, North Carolina