28365, Mount Olive, North Carolina Hypertension Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 28365, Mount Olive, North Carolina is 29 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 77.94 percent of the residents in 28365 has some form of health insurance. 40.66 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 52.11 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28365 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 3,324 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 13 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28365. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 3,044 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 2,502 health care providers accessible to residents in 28365, Mount Olive, North Carolina.

The analysis below assesses the quality of hypertension management within ZIP code 28365, focusing on the availability and performance of primary care physicians in Mount Olive, North Carolina. This evaluation considers various factors, including physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources. The goal is to provide a comprehensive 'Hypertension Score' assessment, highlighting strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement.

The initial assessment begins with physician-to-patient ratios. Determining the precise ratio in Mount Olive requires accessing up-to-date data from sources like the North Carolina Medical Board and the US Census Bureau. A low physician-to-patient ratio, indicating fewer doctors per resident, can strain the healthcare system, potentially leading to longer wait times for appointments and reduced access to preventative care, including hypertension management. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests greater accessibility. However, this is a starting point. The quality of care is not solely determined by the number of physicians.

Next, we examine the characteristics of primary care practices within the area. This includes factors such as the types of services offered, the availability of specialized equipment for blood pressure monitoring (e.g., ambulatory blood pressure monitors), and the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for hypertension treatment. Practices that actively participate in quality improvement initiatives and adhere to established clinical pathways typically demonstrate better patient outcomes. Assessing these practices requires reviewing their accreditation status, patient satisfaction scores, and publicly available performance data.

Telemedicine adoption plays a crucial role in hypertension management. Remote monitoring of blood pressure, virtual consultations, and medication management through telehealth platforms can significantly improve patient adherence to treatment plans and reduce the need for frequent in-person visits. Practices that embrace telemedicine technologies are often better positioned to provide convenient and accessible care, especially for patients with mobility issues or those living in rural areas. The 'Hypertension Score' must reflect the degree to which local practices have integrated telemedicine into their service offerings.

The integration of mental health resources is another critical element. Hypertension is often linked to stress, anxiety, and depression. Primary care practices that provide access to mental health professionals, either through on-site therapists or referral networks, are better equipped to address the holistic needs of patients. This integrated approach can improve patient outcomes by addressing both the physical and psychological aspects of hypertension. The 'Hypertension Score' should reflect the availability and accessibility of these resources.

Standout practices within ZIP code 28365 deserve specific recognition. These practices may excel in areas such as patient education, medication management, or the implementation of innovative technologies. Identifying these high-performing practices can provide valuable insights into best practices and serve as models for other providers in the area. Evaluating their performance involves reviewing patient outcomes, adherence rates, and patient feedback.

A comprehensive 'Hypertension Score' analysis must also consider the challenges faced by patients in Mount Olive. Factors such as socioeconomic status, access to healthy food options, and transportation limitations can significantly impact a patient's ability to manage their hypertension. The analysis should assess the extent to which local practices address these social determinants of health and provide resources to support patients in overcoming these barriers. This includes assessing whether practices provide health education, offer assistance with medication costs, and connect patients with community resources.

The 'Hypertension Score' is not a static measure. It should be regularly updated to reflect changes in healthcare practices, technological advancements, and patient needs. This ongoing assessment allows for continuous improvement and ensures that patients in Mount Olive receive the best possible care for their hypertension. The score can be a valuable tool for patients, providers, and policymakers, providing a clear picture of the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system.

The analysis should also consider the availability of specialist care, such as cardiology and nephrology, within a reasonable distance. Patients with complex cases of hypertension may require the expertise of specialists. The 'Hypertension Score' should reflect the accessibility of these specialists and the coordination of care between primary care physicians and specialists. This includes evaluating the efficiency of referral processes and the communication between different healthcare providers.

Furthermore, the analysis needs to assess the availability of patient education materials and resources. Patients need to be well-informed about their condition, treatment options, and lifestyle modifications. Practices that provide clear, concise, and culturally sensitive educational materials are better equipped to empower patients to take an active role in managing their hypertension. This includes evaluating the availability of written materials, online resources, and educational programs.

The final 'Hypertension Score' will be a composite measure, incorporating all the factors discussed above. It will provide a nuanced understanding of the quality of hypertension management in Mount Olive, North Carolina. The score will serve as a benchmark for improvement and a guide for patients seeking quality care. It will highlight areas where the local healthcare system excels and areas where improvements are needed.

The 'Hypertension Score' should also consider the impact of health insurance coverage. Access to affordable health insurance is essential for patients to receive the care they need. The analysis should assess the percentage of residents with health insurance coverage and the availability of financial assistance programs for those who are uninsured or underinsured. This includes evaluating the acceptance of different insurance plans by local practices.

The analysis should also consider the use of electronic health records (EHRs). EHRs can improve care coordination, reduce medication errors, and provide clinicians with access to comprehensive patient information. Practices that effectively utilize EHRs are often better equipped to manage complex chronic conditions like hypertension. The 'Hypertension Score' should reflect the degree to which local practices have adopted and effectively utilize EHRs.

Finally, the analysis should be transparent and accessible. The methodology used to calculate the 'Hypertension Score' should be clearly explained, and the data sources should be readily available. The results should be presented in a user-friendly format, making it easy for patients, providers, and policymakers to understand the findings. This transparency ensures the credibility of the analysis and promotes accountability within the healthcare system.

To visualize the data and gain a deeper understanding of the geographic distribution of healthcare resources and patient outcomes related to hypertension in Mount Olive and surrounding areas, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome offers interactive mapping tools that can help you analyze the 'Hypertension Score' data, identify areas with high needs, and visualize the impact of various interventions. Explore CartoChrome maps to see the full picture.