28422, Bolivia, North Carolina Hypertension Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 28422, Bolivia, North Carolina is 29 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 87.95 percent of the residents in 28422 has some form of health insurance. 57.59 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 55.51 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28422 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 1,339 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28422. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,599 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 5,979 health care providers accessible to residents in 28422, Bolivia, North Carolina.

## Hypertension Score Analysis: ZIP Code 28422 & Bolivian Primary Care

Analyzing hypertension management requires a multi-faceted approach, considering not just the presence of healthcare providers but also the accessibility, quality, and supporting resources available within a given area. This analysis examines the landscape of hypertension care in ZIP code 28422 (hypothetical location) and the context of primary care availability in Bolivia, focusing on key factors impacting a "Hypertension Score."

**ZIP Code 28422: A Microcosm of Hypertension Care**

The success of hypertension management in ZIP code 28422 hinges on several critical components. First and foremost is the physician-to-patient ratio. A high ratio, indicating fewer doctors per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and potentially, delayed diagnosis and treatment. Conversely, a favorable ratio allows for more personalized care, regular follow-ups, and proactive management strategies. The specifics of this ratio in 28422 would need to be investigated, utilizing data from the US Census Bureau, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), and local physician directories.

Beyond sheer numbers, the quality of care is paramount. This includes the availability of board-certified primary care physicians (PCPs), cardiologists, and nephrologists, all crucial specialists in hypertension management. The presence of practices adhering to the latest clinical guidelines, such as those from the American Heart Association (AHA) and the American College of Cardiology (ACC), is a strong indicator of quality. We'd need to assess the accreditation status of local hospitals and clinics, as well as the adoption of evidence-based practices within individual physician offices.

Standout practices within 28422 would be those demonstrating excellence in hypertension control. This could be assessed through patient outcomes data, such as the percentage of patients achieving blood pressure targets, the rates of complications like stroke or heart attack, and patient satisfaction scores. Practices that proactively engage patients in their care, offering education on lifestyle modifications (diet, exercise, stress management), and providing readily accessible resources, would also score highly.

Telemedicine adoption is increasingly important, particularly for chronic conditions like hypertension. Practices utilizing telehealth platforms for virtual consultations, remote blood pressure monitoring, and medication management can significantly improve access to care, especially for patients with mobility issues or those living in remote areas. Assessing the prevalence of telehealth services in 28422, including the types of platforms used and patient satisfaction with these services, is critical.

Mental health resources are often overlooked in hypertension management, but the connection between stress, anxiety, and elevated blood pressure is well-established. Practices that integrate mental health services, either through in-house therapists or referrals to external providers, demonstrate a more holistic approach to patient care. The availability of these resources in 28422, and the degree to which they are integrated into hypertension management, would be an important factor.

**Primary Care Availability in Bolivia: A Broader Perspective**

The Bolivian context presents a different set of challenges. Primary care availability is often limited, particularly in rural areas. The physician-to-population ratio is likely lower than in developed countries, and access to specialized care, such as cardiology, may be restricted. This scarcity necessitates a focus on strengthening primary care infrastructure.

Bolivia’s "Hypertension Score" would be significantly impacted by the overall health system's capacity. The availability of basic medical equipment, such as blood pressure monitors, and essential medications, including affordable antihypertensive drugs, is crucial. Public health initiatives aimed at hypertension screening and awareness campaigns play a vital role in early detection and prevention.

The role of community health workers (CHWs) is particularly important in Bolivia. CHWs, often drawn from the local population, can provide basic health education, blood pressure screening, and medication adherence support, bridging the gap between patients and limited healthcare resources. Assessing the training, deployment, and effectiveness of CHWs would be essential.

Telemedicine, while potentially offering solutions to access limitations, faces challenges in Bolivia. Reliable internet connectivity and access to technology are not universally available. However, even basic telehealth applications, such as phone consultations or remote monitoring using mobile devices, could improve care delivery in certain areas.

Bolivia's approach to mental health is also important. Stress and socioeconomic factors can significantly impact hypertension. The integration of mental health services into primary care, even at a basic level, can improve outcomes.

**Comparative Analysis and Scoring Considerations**

Creating a comparative "Hypertension Score" would involve assigning weights to each of the factors discussed. For example, the physician-to-patient ratio might carry a significant weight, as it directly impacts access. The availability of specialists and the adoption of evidence-based practices would also be heavily weighted. Telemedicine adoption and mental health integration would receive moderate weights, reflecting their importance in improving care.

The specific data required to calculate these scores would vary depending on the location. In the case of 28422, data collection would involve a combination of public records, physician surveys, and patient feedback. In Bolivia, data collection would be more challenging, requiring collaboration with government health agencies, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and healthcare providers.

**Conclusion**

Evaluating hypertension management requires a comprehensive approach, considering factors from physician-to-patient ratios to the integration of mental health resources. The "Hypertension Score" would reflect the overall capacity of the healthcare system to effectively manage this chronic condition. The analysis should be tailored to each specific location, recognizing the unique challenges and opportunities.

**Ready to visualize the landscape of hypertension care? Explore the data with CartoChrome maps. Understand the distribution of resources, identify areas of need, and create a more informed approach to hypertension management. Visit CartoChrome today to unlock the power of data visualization.**