28617, Crumpler, North Carolina Hypertension Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 28617, Crumpler, North Carolina is 14 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 85.45 percent of the residents in 28617 has some form of health insurance. 56.73 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 51.24 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28617 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 374 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28617. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 459 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 127 health care providers accessible to residents in 28617, Crumpler, North Carolina.

**Hypertension Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 28617 & Primary Care in Crumpler**

Analyzing the landscape of healthcare accessibility and quality within ZIP code 28617, encompassing Crumpler, North Carolina, requires a multi-faceted approach. A ‘Hypertension Score’ analysis, though not a formal, standardized metric, provides a framework to assess the availability and quality of care relevant to managing hypertension, a significant public health concern. This analysis considers factors like physician density, primary care access, telemedicine integration, and the integration of mental health resources, all crucial in effectively managing this chronic condition.

The foundation of this analysis lies in understanding physician-to-patient ratios. The density of primary care physicians (PCPs) is a critical determinant of access. Areas with a higher ratio of patients per PCP often face longer wait times for appointments and potentially less personalized care. Within 28617, the ratio must be assessed using publicly available data, such as the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) data, and local hospital systems. This data will determine the number of PCPs actively practicing within the ZIP code and the estimated population they serve. A lower ratio, indicating more PCPs per capita, would contribute positively to the ‘Hypertension Score.’

Beyond sheer numbers, the distribution of these physicians is equally important. Are PCPs concentrated in a single location, or are they dispersed throughout the community, making access easier for residents in various parts of Crumpler? This geographic analysis is essential. Further investigation into the acceptance of new patients by these PCPs is needed. Some practices may be at capacity, limiting access for new individuals, especially those with pre-existing conditions like hypertension.

Identifying standout practices is crucial. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to comprehensive hypertension management would score favorably. This includes practices that offer regular blood pressure screenings, medication management, patient education on lifestyle modifications (diet, exercise, stress reduction), and robust follow-up protocols. These practices might utilize electronic health records (EHRs) effectively to track patient progress, send reminders for appointments and medication refills, and facilitate communication between the patient and the care team.

Telemedicine adoption is a significant factor in the ‘Hypertension Score.’ Telemedicine, including virtual consultations, remote patient monitoring, and medication management, can significantly improve access to care, especially for patients in rural areas like Crumpler. Practices that offer telemedicine options for hypertension management would receive a higher score. This is particularly important for follow-up appointments, medication adjustments, and providing ongoing support to patients. The availability of telehealth platforms, the ease of use for patients, and the integration of telehealth data into the patient's overall care plan are critical elements.

The integration of mental health resources is another crucial aspect of hypertension management. Chronic stress and mental health conditions, such as anxiety and depression, can significantly impact blood pressure control. Practices that recognize this connection and offer or facilitate access to mental health services would score higher. This could include on-site therapists, partnerships with mental health providers, or the use of screening tools to identify patients who may benefit from mental health support. The ability to address the psychological aspects of hypertension is essential for holistic patient care.

Furthermore, the availability of specialized care is important. While primary care physicians are the cornerstone of hypertension management, access to specialists, such as cardiologists and nephrologists, is often necessary for patients with complex cases or complications. The proximity of specialists, the ease of referral processes, and the availability of specialized services, such as echocardiograms and kidney function tests, would impact the ‘Hypertension Score.’

The quality of patient education materials and resources also plays a role. Practices that provide clear, concise, and culturally sensitive educational materials on hypertension, including information on diet, exercise, medication, and stress management, would score favorably. These materials should be available in multiple formats (e.g., written, online, video) and languages to ensure accessibility for all patients.

Another factor to consider is the practice's use of evidence-based guidelines for hypertension management. Practices that adhere to the latest guidelines from organizations like the American Heart Association (AHA) and the American College of Cardiology (ACC) would receive a higher score. This includes the use of appropriate medications, regular blood pressure monitoring, and lifestyle recommendations.

The overall accessibility of healthcare services, including transportation options and clinic hours, can also affect the ‘Hypertension Score.’ Practices located near public transportation routes, offering flexible appointment times, and providing transportation assistance to patients would score higher. These factors are particularly important in rural areas where transportation can be a significant barrier to care.

Finally, patient satisfaction and feedback are crucial indicators of quality. Practices that actively solicit patient feedback, use patient satisfaction surveys, and respond to patient concerns would be viewed more favorably. This feedback can provide valuable insights into the patient experience and help practices identify areas for improvement.

This ‘Hypertension Score’ analysis provides a framework for evaluating the healthcare landscape in 28617 and Crumpler. It highlights the importance of physician-to-patient ratios, primary care availability, telemedicine adoption, mental health integration, and patient-centered care. It is essential to remember that this is a dynamic assessment, and the healthcare landscape is constantly evolving.

For a comprehensive visual representation of the healthcare landscape in Crumpler and surrounding areas, including physician locations, practice specializations, and access to care indicators, explore the power of CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can provide an interactive and data-rich visualization of the information discussed in this analysis, allowing you to identify areas of strength and areas that may need improvement.