28637, Hildebran, North Carolina Hypertension Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 28637, Hildebran, North Carolina is 54 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 90.97 percent of the residents in 28637 has some form of health insurance. 42.30 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 62.15 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28637 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 247 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 10 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28637. An estimate of 25 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 361 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 6,146 health care providers accessible to residents in 28637, Hildebran, North Carolina.

## Hypertension Score Analysis: Hildebran, NC (ZIP Code 28637)

Analyzing the landscape of hypertension care within Hildebran, North Carolina (ZIP code 28637) requires a multi-faceted approach. This analysis will delve into the availability of primary care physicians, assess physician-to-patient ratios, highlight standout practices, explore telemedicine adoption, and examine the integration of mental health resources. The ultimate goal is to provide a comprehensive "Hypertension Score" assessment, offering insights into the community's capacity to manage and mitigate the risks associated with high blood pressure.

The foundation of effective hypertension management lies in accessible primary care. Hildebran, a relatively small community, likely faces challenges related to primary care physician availability. Assessing the physician-to-patient ratio is crucial. A high ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can translate to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and potentially compromised continuity of care. Publicly available data from sources like the North Carolina Medical Board and the US Census Bureau can be used to estimate this ratio. The analysis should consider the number of active, licensed primary care physicians (internal medicine, family medicine, and general practice) within the 28637 ZIP code and compare it to the estimated population.

Beyond raw numbers, the distribution of these physicians matters. Are they concentrated in a single clinic, or are they dispersed across multiple practices? A centralized model might offer economies of scale but could limit patient choice. Conversely, a more dispersed model might provide greater accessibility but could lead to fragmentation of care. The analysis should identify the location of each practice and assess its capacity to serve the local population.

Identifying standout practices is essential. This involves looking beyond the basic metrics and evaluating the quality of care provided. Practices demonstrating a commitment to evidence-based hypertension management protocols should be highlighted. This includes adherence to guidelines from organizations like the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology. Key indicators include the use of standardized blood pressure measurement techniques, the implementation of patient education programs, and the proactive management of co-morbidities, such as diabetes and high cholesterol, which often accompany hypertension.

Telemedicine adoption represents a significant opportunity to improve hypertension care in rural communities. Telemedicine allows patients to access medical advice and monitoring remotely, reducing the need for in-person visits. This is particularly beneficial for patients with mobility limitations, those living in remote areas, or those with transportation challenges. The analysis should investigate the extent to which practices in Hildebran offer telemedicine services for hypertension management. This includes assessing the availability of virtual consultations, remote blood pressure monitoring devices, and patient portals for communication and medication refills.

The link between mental health and hypertension is well-established. Chronic stress and anxiety can contribute to elevated blood pressure, and managing mental health issues is often crucial for effective hypertension control. The analysis should investigate the availability of mental health resources within Hildebran and the surrounding area. This includes assessing the presence of psychiatrists, psychologists, therapists, and counselors. Furthermore, the analysis should determine the extent to which primary care practices integrate mental health screening and referral services into their hypertension management protocols.

A comprehensive "Hypertension Score" for Hildebran should consider all these factors. The score could be a composite measure, assigning weights to each component based on its relative importance. For example, physician-to-patient ratio might carry a significant weight, reflecting its fundamental impact on access to care. The adoption of telemedicine and the integration of mental health services could also be weighted heavily, reflecting their potential to improve patient outcomes. The score should be accompanied by a detailed explanation of the methodology and the rationale behind the weighting system.

The analysis should also identify potential areas for improvement. This could include recommendations for increasing the number of primary care physicians, promoting the adoption of telemedicine, and strengthening the integration of mental health services. The analysis should also highlight best practices and successful initiatives that could be replicated or expanded upon.

The final "Hypertension Score" should provide a clear and concise assessment of the community's capacity to manage hypertension. It should serve as a valuable resource for healthcare providers, policymakers, and community members. It should also be used to inform strategic planning and resource allocation, ultimately leading to improved health outcomes for the residents of Hildebran.

The analysis should also consider the impact of socioeconomic factors on hypertension management. Poverty, lack of access to healthy food, and limited health literacy can all contribute to poor outcomes. The analysis should identify any disparities in access to care and make recommendations for addressing these inequities.

Furthermore, the analysis should incorporate patient perspectives. This could involve conducting surveys or focus groups to gather information about patient experiences with hypertension care. This feedback can provide valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the current system and help to identify areas for improvement.

Finally, the analysis should be presented in a clear and accessible format. This could include the use of charts, graphs, and maps to visualize the data and make it easier to understand. The report should be written in plain language, avoiding technical jargon whenever possible.

The "Hypertension Score" is not just a number; it is a reflection of the community's commitment to health. It is a starting point for a continuous improvement process, aimed at ensuring that all residents of Hildebran have access to the care they need to manage their hypertension and live long, healthy lives.

For a visual representation of the data and a deeper dive into the geographic distribution of healthcare resources, consider exploring the power of spatial analysis. **Click here to explore CartoChrome maps and unlock a new dimension of understanding.**