28650, Maiden, North Carolina Hypertension Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 28650, Maiden, North Carolina is 49 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 85.69 percent of the residents in 28650 has some form of health insurance. 36.74 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 61.76 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28650 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 2,830 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 10 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28650. An estimate of 5 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,098 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 4,164 health care providers accessible to residents in 28650, Maiden, North Carolina.

## Hypertension Score Analysis: Maiden, NC (ZIP Code 28650)

Analyzing the landscape of hypertension management in Maiden, North Carolina (ZIP code 28650) requires a multi-faceted approach. This analysis will delve into the availability of primary care physicians, assess physician-to-patient ratios, highlight standout practices, explore the adoption of telemedicine, and examine the availability of mental health resources. The ultimate goal is to provide a comprehensive "Hypertension Score" assessment, offering insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare infrastructure in place to combat this pervasive health concern.

The foundation of effective hypertension management rests on accessible primary care. In Maiden, the availability of primary care physicians is a critical factor. Determining the exact number of practicing primary care physicians within ZIP code 28650 is the first step. This includes internal medicine specialists, family medicine physicians, and general practitioners. Publicly available databases, such as those maintained by the North Carolina Medical Board and insurance provider directories, can be used to gather this data.

Once the number of primary care physicians is established, it's essential to calculate the physician-to-patient ratio. This involves estimating the population of Maiden (using US Census Bureau data) and dividing the population by the number of primary care physicians. A lower ratio indicates greater access to primary care. A ratio exceeding the national average warrants concern and suggests potential challenges for patients seeking timely appointments and ongoing care.

Beyond sheer numbers, the quality and reputation of primary care practices in Maiden are crucial. Identifying "standout practices" requires a review of patient reviews, accreditations, and the range of services offered. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to patient education, proactive screening for hypertension, and evidence-based treatment protocols deserve recognition. These practices often employ registered nurses, certified medical assistants, and other allied health professionals to support patient care.

Telemedicine has emerged as a powerful tool for managing chronic conditions like hypertension. Its adoption in Maiden is a key indicator of healthcare accessibility. Practices that offer virtual consultations, remote blood pressure monitoring, and secure messaging platforms demonstrate a commitment to patient convenience and proactive disease management. The availability of telemedicine can be particularly beneficial for patients with mobility limitations, transportation challenges, or those residing in rural areas.

Hypertension is often intertwined with mental health. Stress, anxiety, and depression can contribute to elevated blood pressure and hinder treatment adherence. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources in Maiden is a critical component of a comprehensive hypertension management strategy. This includes access to psychiatrists, psychologists, licensed clinical social workers, and therapists. Proximity to mental health clinics, the acceptance of insurance, and the availability of telehealth options are important considerations.

The "Hypertension Score" itself is a composite measure that integrates all the above factors. It's a subjective assessment, reflecting the overall quality of hypertension management in Maiden. The score can be categorized as follows:

* **Excellent:** Abundant primary care physicians, low physician-to-patient ratio, widespread telemedicine adoption, readily available mental health resources, and highly-rated primary care practices.
* **Good:** Adequate primary care physician availability, reasonable physician-to-patient ratio, some telemedicine adoption, accessible mental health resources, and generally positive patient feedback.
* **Fair:** Limited primary care physician availability, high physician-to-patient ratio, minimal telemedicine adoption, limited mental health resources, and mixed patient feedback.
* **Poor:** Severe shortage of primary care physicians, very high physician-to-patient ratio, no telemedicine adoption, scarce mental health resources, and negative patient feedback.

The score should be accompanied by specific recommendations for improvement. For example, if the physician-to-patient ratio is high, strategies to attract new primary care physicians to the area should be considered. If telemedicine adoption is low, initiatives to encourage its implementation should be prioritized.

A thorough analysis of the data would include a detailed examination of specific practices. Identifying those with exemplary hypertension management programs, including their patient education materials, adherence to guidelines, and patient outcomes, is valuable. Conversely, practices that may need improvement could be identified, providing opportunities for targeted interventions and support.

Furthermore, the analysis should consider the socioeconomic factors that can impact hypertension management. Factors such as income levels, access to healthy food options, and insurance coverage rates should be assessed. These factors can influence patient access to care, medication adherence, and overall health outcomes.

The final "Hypertension Score" analysis is not just a static assessment; it's a dynamic tool that can be used to monitor progress over time. Regular updates and revisions are necessary to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape. This includes tracking the arrival of new physicians, the adoption of new technologies, and the evolution of healthcare policies.

This analysis provides a framework for understanding the complexities of hypertension management in Maiden, North Carolina. It highlights the importance of primary care access, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and the quality of care provided by local practices. The "Hypertension Score" offers a valuable tool for assessing the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare system and identifying areas for improvement.