28652, Minneapolis, North Carolina Hypertension Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 28652, Minneapolis, North Carolina is 28 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 90.91 percent of the residents in 28652 has some form of health insurance. 22.08 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 74.03 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28652 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 37 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28652. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 8 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 2,166 health care providers accessible to residents in 28652, Minneapolis, North Carolina.

## Hypertension Score Analysis: 28652 & Minneapolis

This analysis provides a comparative overview of hypertension management resources and accessibility, focusing on two distinct geographic areas: ZIP Code 28652 in North Carolina and primary care availability within Minneapolis, Minnesota. We'll evaluate factors crucial for effective hypertension control, including physician density, practice characteristics, telemedicine integration, and the availability of mental health support, culminating in a call to action for utilizing CartoChrome maps for enhanced data visualization.

**28652: Rural Challenges in Hypertension Management**

ZIP Code 28652, likely representing a rural or semi-rural area, presents inherent challenges in healthcare delivery, particularly concerning chronic conditions like hypertension. The physician-to-patient ratio is a primary indicator of access. A lower ratio, reflecting fewer physicians per capita, can translate to longer wait times for appointments, reduced opportunities for preventative care, and potentially delayed diagnosis and treatment. The availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) is critical, as they often serve as the first point of contact for hypertension screening, management, and referral to specialists if necessary.

Standout practices within 28652, if any, would likely distinguish themselves through innovative approaches to overcome these geographical limitations. This could include extended office hours, offering weekend appointments, or actively participating in community outreach programs to educate residents about hypertension risks and management strategies. The success of these practices hinges on their ability to build strong relationships with patients and foster a culture of proactive health management. The presence of nurse practitioners and physician assistants can also significantly improve access, especially in areas with a scarcity of PCPs.

Telemedicine adoption is a crucial factor. Remote monitoring of blood pressure, virtual consultations, and medication management through telemedicine can bridge geographical barriers and improve patient adherence to treatment plans. Practices that embrace telemedicine technologies are better positioned to provide consistent care and support, especially for patients with limited mobility or transportation challenges. However, the effectiveness of telemedicine relies on reliable internet access and patient digital literacy, which may be limitations in a rural setting.

Mental health resources are often under-resourced in rural areas, yet are essential for hypertension management. Stress and anxiety can significantly impact blood pressure levels. Practices that integrate mental health screening and counseling into their care plans are better equipped to address the holistic needs of their patients. Collaboration with local mental health providers, or the availability of on-site mental health professionals, would be highly beneficial.

**Minneapolis: Urban Advantages and Accessibility**

Minneapolis, a major metropolitan area, generally enjoys a more favorable healthcare landscape compared to rural settings. The physician-to-patient ratio is typically higher, indicating greater access to PCPs and specialists. This increased density of healthcare providers often translates to shorter wait times, more appointment options, and a wider range of specialized services.

Primary care availability is generally robust in Minneapolis. However, even in an urban environment, disparities in access can exist based on socioeconomic factors, insurance coverage, and geographic location within the city. Practices with a strong focus on serving underserved populations, offering sliding-scale fees, and accepting a wide range of insurance plans are crucial for ensuring equitable access to care.

Standout practices in Minneapolis may differentiate themselves through innovative service models, such as patient-centered medical homes, which emphasize coordinated care, preventative services, and patient engagement. They may also offer specialized programs for hypertension management, including dedicated nurse educators, dietitians, and exercise specialists.

Telemedicine adoption is also increasing in Minneapolis. The availability of virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and online patient portals can improve convenience and access, particularly for patients with busy schedules or mobility limitations. The presence of robust broadband infrastructure and high rates of digital literacy further enhance the effectiveness of telemedicine initiatives.

Mental health resources are typically more readily available in urban areas. However, even in Minneapolis, access to mental health services can be a challenge. Practices that integrate mental health screening, counseling, and referrals into their care plans are better positioned to address the complex needs of their patients. Collaboration with mental health providers, both within and outside the practice, is crucial.

**Comparative Analysis and Conclusion**

In comparing the two areas, Minneapolis likely demonstrates a higher overall Hypertension Score due to its greater physician density, broader access to primary care, and more developed infrastructure for telemedicine and mental health services. However, the specific performance of practices within each area will vary. Effective hypertension management relies on a combination of factors, including patient education, medication adherence, lifestyle modifications, and regular monitoring.

In 28652, the focus should be on overcoming geographical barriers and expanding access through telemedicine, community outreach, and innovative service models. In Minneapolis, the focus should be on ensuring equitable access to care, addressing social determinants of health, and integrating mental health services.

For a deeper dive into the data, visualizing the distribution of healthcare resources, and identifying areas with the greatest needs, consider utilizing CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome offers powerful mapping and data visualization tools that can provide a granular understanding of healthcare access, physician density, and other relevant factors. This can help healthcare providers, policymakers, and community organizations make informed decisions and develop targeted interventions to improve hypertension management outcomes. Explore the potential of CartoChrome maps today to gain a comprehensive understanding of the healthcare landscape and optimize your efforts to combat hypertension.