The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 07718, Belford, New Jersey is 71 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 98.32 percent of the residents in 07718 has some form of health insurance. 17.42 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 92.36 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 07718 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,668 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 3 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 07718. An estimate of 11 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 954 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 4,550 health care providers accessible to residents in 07718, Belford, New Jersey.
Health Scores in 07718, Belford, New Jersey
Hypertension Score | 74 |
---|---|
People Score | 45 |
Provider Score | 71 |
Hospital Score | 33 |
Travel Score | 79 |
07718 | Belford | New Jersey | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis below provides a hypothetical ‘Hypertension Score’ assessment for primary care physicians within the 07718 ZIP code, specifically focusing on Belford, NJ, and their capacity to manage hypertension. This score is not based on actual data but rather serves as an illustrative example of how such an assessment might be structured, considering various factors crucial for effective hypertension care.
The ‘Hypertension Score’ would begin by evaluating the physician-to-patient ratio in Belford. A high ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, could potentially hinder access to care and follow-up appointments, crucial for hypertension management. Conversely, a lower ratio would suggest better access. The analysis would quantify this, perhaps using a scale where a lower ratio translates to a higher score component.
Next, the analysis would consider the availability of primary care physicians accepting new patients. A practice that is consistently open to new patients is more likely to provide timely access to care, especially for individuals newly diagnosed with hypertension. The ‘Hypertension Score’ would incorporate this, with practices accepting new patients receiving a higher score component. The analysis would also account for the presence of extended hours, weekend appointments, and same-day appointments, which can significantly improve accessibility.
A critical aspect of the ‘Hypertension Score’ would be the evaluation of each practice's commitment to evidence-based hypertension management. This involves assessing whether the practice adheres to the latest guidelines from organizations like the American Heart Association (AHA) and the American College of Cardiology (ACC). The analysis would examine the use of standardized protocols for blood pressure measurement, diagnosis, and treatment. Practices utilizing electronic health records (EHRs) with built-in decision support tools for hypertension management would receive a higher score.
The assessment would also scrutinize the adoption of telemedicine within each practice. Telemedicine can be particularly beneficial for hypertension management, allowing for remote blood pressure monitoring, medication adjustments, and virtual follow-up appointments. Practices actively utilizing telehealth platforms for hypertension care would be awarded a higher score. This includes the ease of use of the platform, the availability of technical support for patients, and the integration of telehealth data into the patient's medical record.
The analysis would then delve into the availability of mental health resources within or connected to each practice. Hypertension is often linked to stress and anxiety, and integrated mental health support can significantly improve patient outcomes. Practices with on-site therapists, partnerships with mental health professionals, or referral pathways to mental health services would receive a higher score. The analysis would consider the accessibility of these resources, including wait times for appointments and the acceptance of various insurance plans.
Furthermore, the ‘Hypertension Score’ would consider the availability of patient education materials and resources. Practices that provide patients with comprehensive information about hypertension, including lifestyle modifications such as diet and exercise, would score higher. This includes the availability of educational brochures, online resources, and group education sessions. The analysis would evaluate the language accessibility of these materials, ensuring they cater to the diverse population of Belford.
The assessment would also evaluate the practices' commitment to patient-centered care. This involves assessing the practices' communication strategies, the responsiveness of the staff, and the patient's overall experience. Practices that prioritize patient satisfaction and actively solicit feedback would receive a higher score. This could be measured through patient surveys, online reviews, and the availability of patient portals for communication and appointment scheduling.
Standout practices in Belford would be identified based on their overall ‘Hypertension Score’. These practices would be characterized by a combination of factors, including a low physician-to-patient ratio, a commitment to evidence-based care, the adoption of telemedicine, the availability of mental health resources, and a strong focus on patient education and patient-centered care. They would be the models for other practices to emulate.
The analysis would also address the potential challenges in Belford's healthcare landscape. This includes the impact of socioeconomic factors on hypertension prevalence and management. The analysis would consider the availability of affordable healthcare options, the accessibility of healthy food choices, and the availability of safe spaces for physical activity. Practices that actively address these challenges through community outreach programs or partnerships with local organizations would receive a higher score.
The ‘Hypertension Score’ would not only provide a ranking of physicians but also highlight areas for improvement within the Belford healthcare system. This could include recommendations for increasing the adoption of telemedicine, improving access to mental health resources, and enhancing patient education efforts. The analysis would serve as a valuable tool for patients seeking primary care in Belford and for healthcare providers striving to improve their hypertension management practices.
The concluding section of the analysis would offer a call to action. It would encourage users to explore the healthcare landscape of Belford in greater detail using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps would allow users to visualize the geographic distribution of physicians, the availability of healthcare resources, and the socioeconomic factors that impact hypertension prevalence. By using CartoChrome maps, users can gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare environment in Belford and make informed decisions about their healthcare needs.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like