The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 07926, Brookside, New Jersey is 81 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 07926 has some form of health insurance. 0.00 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 100.00 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 07926 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 31 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 10 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 07926. An estimate of 4 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 0 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 2,618 health care providers accessible to residents in 07926, Brookside, New Jersey.
Health Scores in 07926, Brookside, New Jersey
Hypertension Score | 100 |
---|---|
People Score | 100 |
Provider Score | 81 |
Hospital Score | 85 |
Travel Score | 73 |
07926 | Brookside | New Jersey | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
**Hypertension Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 07926 and Primary Care Availability in Brookside**
Analyzing the healthcare landscape within ZIP code 07926, encompassing the community of Brookside, requires a multifaceted approach to assess the availability and quality of primary care physicians, specifically concerning hypertension management. A comprehensive "Hypertension Score" would consider several key factors, from physician-to-patient ratios to the integration of telemedicine and mental health resources, all crucial for effective and accessible care. This analysis aims to provide a granular understanding of the current situation, highlighting strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement.
The physician-to-patient ratio is a fundamental indicator of access to care. In 07926, determining this ratio requires identifying the number of practicing primary care physicians (PCPs) within the ZIP code and comparing it to the resident population. Publicly available data from sources like the US Census Bureau and the New Jersey Department of Health, combined with physician directories and insurance provider networks, are essential for this calculation. A high ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and potentially, delayed diagnosis and treatment for conditions like hypertension. Conversely, a lower ratio suggests greater accessibility.
Identifying standout practices within 07926 is crucial. This involves examining several criteria. Does the practice have a dedicated focus on chronic disease management, including hypertension? Do they utilize evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis and treatment? Are they proactive in patient education and self-management strategies? Practices that excel in these areas often demonstrate improved patient outcomes. Reviews from patients, available through online platforms and insurance provider websites, can provide valuable insights into patient satisfaction, communication, and the overall quality of care. Furthermore, practices employing certified hypertension specialists or offering specialized programs would likely score higher.
Telemedicine adoption is another critical component of the Hypertension Score. Telemedicine, including virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and medication management, can significantly improve access to care, especially for patients with chronic conditions like hypertension. Practices that offer telemedicine options can reach a broader patient base, provide more frequent follow-ups, and facilitate more convenient medication refills. The availability of remote blood pressure monitoring devices, integrated with the practice’s electronic health record (EHR) system, is a particularly valuable asset. Practices with robust telemedicine capabilities would receive a higher score, reflecting their commitment to patient-centered care and technological innovation.
The integration of mental health resources is also vital. Hypertension and mental health often have a complex interplay. Stress, anxiety, and depression can contribute to elevated blood pressure, while the diagnosis and management of hypertension can also impact mental well-being. Practices that integrate mental health services, either through in-house therapists or referrals to external providers, demonstrate a more holistic approach to patient care. Collaboration between PCPs and mental health professionals can lead to better patient outcomes, particularly for individuals experiencing stress-related hypertension or those struggling to adhere to treatment plans.
Evaluating the availability of these resources is essential. Does the practice have a dedicated mental health professional on staff? Do they offer referrals to mental health specialists within the community? Are they actively screening patients for mental health conditions? The presence of these resources would significantly enhance the Hypertension Score, reflecting the practice's commitment to addressing the multifaceted needs of its patients.
Furthermore, the analysis should consider the practice’s commitment to patient education. Do they provide educational materials about hypertension, including lifestyle modifications such as diet, exercise, and stress management? Do they offer group classes or individual counseling sessions? Practices that prioritize patient education empower individuals to take control of their health, leading to improved adherence to treatment plans and better blood pressure control. This commitment to patient education should be reflected in the Hypertension Score.
The accessibility of pharmacies within the ZIP code is also relevant. The proximity of pharmacies, especially those offering medication adherence programs and convenient refill options, can significantly impact patient compliance with their prescribed medications. Practices located near pharmacies, or those with integrated pharmacy services, would receive a higher score, as it facilitates easier access to medications and reduces potential barriers to treatment.
Finally, the analysis should consider the practice's use of electronic health records (EHRs). EHRs facilitate the tracking of patient data, including blood pressure readings, medication lists, and laboratory results. They also enable efficient communication between healthcare providers and patients. Practices with well-integrated EHR systems, allowing for easy access to patient information and the generation of reports, would score higher. This reflects their commitment to data-driven decision-making and efficient patient management.
In conclusion, assessing the quality of primary care in 07926, with a focus on hypertension management, requires a comprehensive evaluation of physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, patient education initiatives, pharmacy accessibility, and the use of EHRs. A higher Hypertension Score would reflect practices that demonstrate a commitment to providing accessible, patient-centered, and evidence-based care. This detailed analysis helps to understand the current state of healthcare in Brookside and identifies opportunities for improvement.
For a visual representation of this healthcare landscape, including the geographic distribution of physicians, pharmacies, and other relevant resources, explore CartoChrome maps.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like