The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 15364, Sycamore, Pennsylvania is 89 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 91.15 percent of the residents in 15364 has some form of health insurance. 32.01 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 78.76 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 15364 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 114 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 15364. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 132 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 765 health care providers accessible to residents in 15364, Sycamore, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 15364, Sycamore, Pennsylvania
Hypertension Score | 91 |
---|---|
People Score | 93 |
Provider Score | 89 |
Hospital Score | 39 |
Travel Score | 44 |
15364 | Sycamore | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis focuses on hypertension management within the 15364 ZIP code, specifically evaluating primary care resources in Sycamore, Pennsylvania. The aim is to provide a comprehensive 'Hypertension Score' assessment, considering factors crucial for effective patient care. This score will be determined by evaluating physician-to-patient ratios, identifying standout practices, assessing telemedicine adoption, and examining the availability of mental health resources, all within the context of hypertension management.
Physician-to-patient ratios serve as a fundamental indicator of accessibility. In Sycamore, the ratio of primary care physicians to the population is a critical metric. A higher ratio, indicating fewer patients per physician, generally translates to easier access to appointments, shorter wait times, and more personalized care. Conversely, a lower ratio may strain resources, potentially leading to delayed diagnoses and treatment adjustments for hypertension. The specific physician-to-patient ratio within 15364 requires detailed investigation, including the number of active primary care physicians practicing within the ZIP code and the total population. This data is essential to accurately gauge the availability of primary care services and its impact on hypertension management.
Standout practices are those that demonstrate exceptional performance in hypertension management. These practices often employ evidence-based guidelines, incorporate patient education programs, and utilize innovative approaches to improve patient outcomes. Identifying these practices requires examining several factors. These include the percentage of patients with controlled blood pressure, the utilization of medication adherence programs, the frequency of patient follow-up appointments, and the integration of lifestyle interventions. Practices that consistently achieve high rates of blood pressure control and patient satisfaction, while also actively engaging patients in their care, would be considered exemplary. A deep dive into patient reviews, practice website information, and possibly even direct communication with practices would be required to identify the top performers in the area.
Telemedicine adoption plays an increasingly significant role in hypertension management. Telemedicine allows for remote blood pressure monitoring, virtual consultations, and medication management, potentially improving access to care, especially for patients in rural areas or those with mobility limitations. The 'Hypertension Score' will consider the extent to which primary care practices in Sycamore have embraced telemedicine. This includes the availability of virtual appointments, the use of remote blood pressure monitoring devices, and the integration of telehealth platforms into the practice's workflow. Practices that proactively utilize telemedicine to monitor patients, adjust medications, and provide ongoing support will receive a higher score.
The intricate relationship between hypertension and mental health is crucial. Chronic stress, anxiety, and depression can significantly impact blood pressure control. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources within the community is a critical component of the 'Hypertension Score'. This includes assessing the accessibility of mental health professionals, such as psychiatrists, psychologists, and therapists, within the 15364 ZIP code. The analysis will also consider the integration of mental health services into primary care practices. Practices that offer on-site mental health services or have established referral pathways to mental health providers will be viewed favorably. Furthermore, the availability of support groups, educational programs, and resources for managing stress and anxiety within the community will be considered.
The 'Hypertension Score' will be a composite measure, reflecting the interplay of these factors. Each component – physician-to-patient ratio, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources – will be weighted based on its relative importance in achieving optimal hypertension management. The final score will be a numerical representation of the overall quality and accessibility of hypertension care within Sycamore.
The analysis will incorporate data from various sources. This includes publicly available information from the Pennsylvania Department of Health, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), and professional medical organizations. Patient reviews, practice websites, and potentially direct communication with primary care practices will be used to gather more granular data. This information will be carefully analyzed and validated to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the 'Hypertension Score'.
The methodology will involve a detailed assessment of each primary care practice within the 15364 ZIP code. Each practice will be evaluated based on the criteria outlined above. The 'Hypertension Score' will be calculated for each practice, and then an overall score for Sycamore will be determined, reflecting the aggregate performance of all primary care providers in the area.
The findings of the 'Hypertension Score' analysis will provide valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of hypertension management in Sycamore. It will identify areas where improvements are needed and highlight best practices that can be replicated. This information can be used by healthcare providers, policymakers, and patients to improve the quality and accessibility of hypertension care within the community. The analysis will also identify potential gaps in care and suggest strategies for addressing them.
The ultimate goal of the 'Hypertension Score' is to empower patients and healthcare providers to make informed decisions about hypertension management. By providing a clear and concise assessment of the available resources, the analysis will help patients find the care they need and support healthcare providers in delivering high-quality care.
The results of this analysis, including the 'Hypertension Score' and a detailed breakdown of the contributing factors, will be invaluable for anyone seeking to understand the landscape of hypertension management in Sycamore. It will serve as a guide for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers, facilitating informed decision-making and ultimately improving the health and well-being of the community.
For a comprehensive visual representation of the data and a deeper dive into the geographical distribution of primary care resources and hypertension-related health outcomes in the 15364 ZIP code, we encourage you to explore the interactive maps and data visualizations offered by CartoChrome. CartoChrome maps can provide a powerful tool for understanding the complexities of hypertension management and identifying areas for improvement.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like