15443, Hibbs, Pennsylvania Hypertension Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 15443, Hibbs, Pennsylvania is 37 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 15443 has some form of health insurance. 0.00 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 100.00 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 15443 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 146 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 5 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 15443. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 0 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 2,145 health care providers accessible to residents in 15443, Hibbs, Pennsylvania.

**Hypertension Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 15443 & Primary Care Availability in Hibbs**

Analyzing the healthcare landscape within ZIP Code 15443, encompassing the Hibbs area, requires a multi-faceted approach to assess the availability and quality of primary care, particularly regarding hypertension management. This analysis delves into physician-to-patient ratios, highlights standout practices, examines telemedicine adoption, and explores the integration of mental health resources, all crucial components in evaluating a “Hypertension Score” for the region.

The foundation of any assessment lies in understanding the physician-to-patient ratio. A low ratio indicates a higher concentration of physicians relative to the population, suggesting better access to care. Conversely, a high ratio could signal potential challenges in scheduling appointments, longer wait times, and potentially, a less personalized approach to patient care. The specific physician-to-patient ratio for 15443, and Hibbs in particular, needs to be determined through data analysis. Publicly available data from sources like the US Census Bureau and the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) would be necessary to calculate this ratio accurately. The ratio, however, only provides a snapshot.

Beyond the raw numbers, the quality of care delivered by the available physicians is paramount. Identifying “standout practices” requires a deeper dive. This involves evaluating factors such as patient satisfaction scores (obtained from surveys and online reviews), adherence to evidence-based guidelines for hypertension management (as assessed through chart audits or practice self-reporting), and the utilization of technology to improve patient outcomes. Practices that actively engage in patient education, offer comprehensive lifestyle counseling (including diet and exercise recommendations), and proactively monitor patient blood pressure readings would likely score higher. Furthermore, practices that demonstrate a commitment to preventative care, such as regular screenings for related conditions like diabetes and cardiovascular disease, would be considered more effective in managing hypertension.

Telemedicine adoption has become increasingly significant, especially in rural or underserved areas. The ability to offer virtual consultations, remote blood pressure monitoring, and medication management through telehealth platforms can significantly improve access to care, especially for patients who face geographical barriers or mobility limitations. A “Hypertension Score” should reflect the extent to which local practices have embraced telemedicine. Practices that offer telehealth options, utilize remote monitoring devices, and provide digital patient portals for communication and information sharing would receive higher scores. The ease of use, security, and integration of these technologies into the overall care process are also critical factors.

The interconnectedness of physical and mental health is increasingly recognized. Hypertension is often exacerbated by stress, anxiety, and depression. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources within the primary care setting is a crucial component of a comprehensive hypertension management strategy. Practices that have integrated mental health professionals, such as psychologists or counselors, into their care teams would likely score higher. This integration allows for a more holistic approach, addressing both the physical and emotional aspects of the condition. Furthermore, practices that offer referrals to mental health specialists outside the practice, or provide educational materials on stress management and coping mechanisms, would demonstrate a commitment to patient well-being.

Specific examples of practices within 15443 and Hibbs that excel in these areas would significantly enhance the analysis. Identifying practices that consistently achieve high patient satisfaction scores, demonstrate adherence to hypertension guidelines, and actively utilize telemedicine would be crucial. Furthermore, highlighting practices that have successfully integrated mental health services or have implemented innovative patient education programs would provide valuable insights. This requires a thorough investigation of the local healthcare landscape, gathering data from various sources and potentially conducting interviews with patients and healthcare providers.

The “Hypertension Score” itself would be a composite measure, reflecting the weighted contributions of each of the factors discussed. The physician-to-patient ratio, patient satisfaction scores, adherence to guidelines, telemedicine adoption, and integration of mental health resources would each contribute to the overall score. The weighting of each factor would be determined based on its relative importance in achieving optimal hypertension management outcomes. For instance, adherence to evidence-based guidelines might be weighted more heavily than telemedicine adoption, depending on the specific context and the availability of resources.

The final “Hypertension Score” would provide a valuable benchmark for assessing the quality and accessibility of hypertension care in 15443 and Hibbs. It could be used to identify areas for improvement, highlight best practices, and inform healthcare policy decisions. This score would be a dynamic measure, subject to change as the healthcare landscape evolves and new technologies and approaches are implemented. Regular reassessment and updates would be essential to ensure its continued relevance and accuracy.

This analysis, however, is only a starting point. A comprehensive understanding of the healthcare landscape requires a deeper dive into the specific practices, their staffing, their technology infrastructure, and their commitment to patient-centered care. The information gathered can be visualized through interactive maps.

**Call to Action:**

To visualize the healthcare landscape of 15443 and Hibbs, including physician locations, practice types, and access to resources, we encourage you to explore CartoChrome maps. These maps can provide an interactive and informative way to understand the distribution of healthcare services and identify areas where improvements are needed.