15610, Acme, Pennsylvania Hypertension Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 15610, Acme, Pennsylvania is 80 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 96.49 percent of the residents in 15610 has some form of health insurance. 36.35 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 76.10 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 15610 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 505 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 15610. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 874 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 5,055 health care providers accessible to residents in 15610, Acme, Pennsylvania.

**Hypertension Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 15610 & Primary Care in Acme**

Analyzing healthcare access and quality within ZIP Code 15610, encompassing the town of Acme, requires a multi-faceted approach. This analysis will generate a hypothetical "Hypertension Score," a composite metric reflecting factors crucial for effectively managing hypertension, a widespread health concern. The score will consider physician availability, practice characteristics, technology adoption, and mental health support, all critical elements for patient well-being.

The foundation of a good hypertension management system is access to primary care physicians. In Acme, the physician-to-patient ratio is a critical starting point. A low ratio, indicating a scarcity of doctors, negatively impacts the Hypertension Score. Conversely, a higher ratio, where more physicians serve the population, suggests greater accessibility and a higher score. Data from sources like the U.S. Census Bureau and the American Medical Association would be essential for determining the actual physician-to-patient ratio in 15610. This data would be compared to state and national averages to provide context.

Beyond mere numbers, the distribution of primary care physicians matters. Are physicians concentrated in a few large practices, or is there a more even spread across the area? Concentrated practices might offer economies of scale but could also lead to longer wait times and potentially less personalized care. A more dispersed network, while potentially offering more convenient access, might lack the resources of larger practices. The analysis would consider the geographical distribution of practices within 15610, assessing their proximity to residential areas and transportation options.

Standout practices within 15610 would significantly impact the Hypertension Score. These practices demonstrate superior hypertension management through evidence-based practices. This includes the use of electronic health records (EHRs) for tracking patient data, implementing standardized protocols for blood pressure measurement and follow-up, and offering patient education programs. Practices that actively engage patients in their care, through shared decision-making and self-management support, would receive higher scores. The analysis would need to examine publicly available information, such as practice websites, patient reviews, and potentially data from quality reporting initiatives, to identify these standout practices.

Telemedicine adoption is a key factor in the modern healthcare landscape, especially for managing chronic conditions like hypertension. Practices that offer telehealth consultations, remote blood pressure monitoring, and virtual patient education programs would receive a higher Hypertension Score. Telemedicine expands access to care, particularly for patients with mobility issues, those living in rural areas, or those with transportation challenges. The analysis would assess the availability of telemedicine services within 15610, considering the types of services offered, the ease of access, and the patient satisfaction levels.

The crucial link between mental health and hypertension management cannot be overstated. Stress, anxiety, and depression can significantly impact blood pressure control. Practices that integrate mental health services into their care models would receive a higher score. This includes having on-site mental health professionals, offering referrals to mental health specialists, and providing resources for stress management and coping skills. The analysis would examine the availability of mental health services within primary care practices in 15610, assessing the integration of these services and the accessibility for patients.

The availability of ancillary services also influences the Hypertension Score. Access to registered dietitians, certified diabetes educators, and pharmacists who can provide medication counseling is vital for effective hypertension management. Practices that collaborate with these professionals, offering integrated care, would be viewed favorably. The analysis would evaluate the availability of these ancillary services within the 15610 area and assess the level of collaboration between primary care physicians and these specialists.

The cost of care is another important consideration. Practices that accept a wide range of insurance plans, offer affordable payment options, and are transparent about their pricing would be viewed more favorably. The analysis would consider the insurance coverage accepted by practices in 15610 and assess the availability of financial assistance programs for patients.

The overall Hypertension Score for doctors in 15610 would be a composite of these factors. Each factor would be assigned a weight based on its importance in hypertension management. For example, physician-to-patient ratio and the presence of evidence-based protocols might be weighted more heavily than the availability of a specific patient education program. The final score would be a numerical value, allowing for a comparative analysis of healthcare quality within the area.

The analysis would not only provide a score but also identify areas for improvement. For example, if telemedicine adoption is low, the analysis would highlight the need for practices to embrace this technology. If mental health services are lacking, the analysis would emphasize the importance of integrating these services into primary care. This data-driven approach provides a roadmap for improving healthcare access and quality for residents of Acme and the surrounding areas.

The hypothetical "Hypertension Score" provides a framework for understanding healthcare access and quality within ZIP Code 15610. The actual score would depend on the specific data collected and the weighting assigned to each factor. This analysis highlights the importance of a comprehensive approach to healthcare, considering not only the availability of physicians but also the quality of care provided, the integration of technology, and the support offered for mental health and lifestyle management.

To visualize the geographical distribution of healthcare resources, the locations of practices, and the demographics of the population, consider using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can provide a powerful visual representation of the data, making it easier to identify areas with limited access to care and to understand the factors that influence hypertension management.