15620, Bradenville, Pennsylvania Hypertension Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 15620, Bradenville, Pennsylvania is 92 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 15620 has some form of health insurance. 77.06 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 51.82 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 15620 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 143 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 15620. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 142 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 6,145 health care providers accessible to residents in 15620, Bradenville, Pennsylvania.

The analysis focuses on hypertension management within the 15620 ZIP code, specifically examining the quality of primary care and its impact on patient outcomes. This involves evaluating physician availability, the adoption of innovative healthcare practices, and the integration of mental health services, all crucial factors in controlling and treating hypertension. The goal is to provide a comprehensive overview, enabling residents to make informed decisions about their healthcare.

Bradenville, Pennsylvania, located within the 15620 ZIP code, presents a unique healthcare landscape. Assessing the availability of primary care physicians is the first step. Physician-to-patient ratios are a critical metric. A higher ratio, indicating fewer physicians per patient, can lead to longer wait times for appointments and potentially less individualized care. Conversely, a lower ratio suggests greater accessibility. Publicly available data from sources like the Pennsylvania Department of Health and the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) would be crucial in determining this ratio within Bradenville. The analysis would compare the local ratio to state and national averages to understand the relative accessibility of primary care.

Beyond sheer numbers, the quality of care is paramount. Identifying standout practices requires looking at several factors. These include patient satisfaction scores, measured through surveys and online reviews. Another key indicator is the practice's commitment to evidence-based medicine. This means adhering to established guidelines for hypertension management, such as those published by the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology. The analysis would investigate the use of standardized protocols for blood pressure monitoring, medication management, and lifestyle counseling.

Telemedicine adoption is another critical area of assessment. The ability to offer virtual consultations, remote patient monitoring, and online educational resources can significantly improve hypertension management. Telemedicine can increase access to care, especially for patients with mobility issues or those living in rural areas. The analysis would investigate the extent to which practices in Bradenville utilize telemedicine platforms, the types of services offered virtually, and the patient experience with these technologies. This includes assessing the availability of remote blood pressure monitoring devices and the integration of telehealth into the overall care plan.

Mental health is inextricably linked to hypertension. Stress, anxiety, and depression can significantly impact blood pressure levels and treatment adherence. Therefore, the integration of mental health resources within primary care practices is crucial. The analysis would examine the availability of on-site mental health professionals, such as therapists or counselors, or the presence of referral pathways to external mental health providers. It would also assess the extent to which practices screen patients for mental health conditions and address these issues as part of their overall hypertension management strategy. This includes evaluating the collaboration between primary care physicians and mental health specialists.

Specific practices within the 15620 ZIP code would be evaluated based on the criteria outlined above. For example, the analysis would look at the patient-to-physician ratio at each practice. It would investigate whether the practices have adopted telemedicine technologies, such as virtual consultations or remote monitoring. It would also examine the integration of mental health services, such as on-site counseling or referrals to mental health specialists. The goal is to identify practices that excel in hypertension management and provide a high level of care.

The analysis would also consider the availability of support services for patients. This includes access to patient education materials, such as brochures, websites, and classes, which can help patients understand their condition and manage their treatment plans. It also includes the availability of resources for healthy eating, such as referrals to dietitians or nutritionists. Furthermore, the analysis would assess the availability of support groups or other peer-to-peer support programs, which can provide patients with emotional support and practical advice.

The evaluation of each practice would consider the use of electronic health records (EHRs). EHRs can improve care coordination, medication management, and patient communication. The analysis would assess the extent to which practices use EHRs to track patient progress, share information with other healthcare providers, and communicate with patients electronically. It would also investigate the use of EHRs to generate reports on patient outcomes and identify areas for improvement.

The analysis would also examine the practice's commitment to patient education and empowerment. This includes providing patients with information about their condition, treatment options, and lifestyle modifications. It also includes encouraging patients to actively participate in their care by asking questions, sharing their concerns, and making informed decisions. The analysis would assess the availability of educational materials, the use of patient portals, and the practice's overall approach to patient communication.

The final 'Hypertension Score' would be a composite score reflecting the various factors discussed. It would provide a comparative ranking of the primary care practices within the 15620 ZIP code, allowing residents to make informed decisions about their healthcare. This score would be based on a weighted average of the different criteria, with higher weights assigned to factors that have a greater impact on patient outcomes.

The analysis, while comprehensive, is limited by the availability of public data. Access to detailed patient-level data is often restricted. Therefore, the analysis relies on publicly available information, such as physician directories, practice websites, and government reports. The accuracy of the analysis depends on the completeness and accuracy of this data.

To further explore the healthcare landscape of Bradenville and the surrounding areas, including the locations of primary care physicians, hospitals, and pharmacies, and to visualize the data discussed in this analysis, we encourage you to explore the interactive maps and data visualizations offered by CartoChrome. Their platform can help you understand the spatial distribution of healthcare resources and make informed decisions about your health.