The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 15860, Sigel, Pennsylvania is 51 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 95.24 percent of the residents in 15860 has some form of health insurance. 42.08 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 74.63 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 15860 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 194 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 15860. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 283 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 167 health care providers accessible to residents in 15860, Sigel, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 15860, Sigel, Pennsylvania
Hypertension Score | 68 |
---|---|
People Score | 78 |
Provider Score | 51 |
Hospital Score | 61 |
Travel Score | 28 |
15860 | Sigel | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Hypertension Score Analysis: Sigel, PA (ZIP Code 15860)
Analyzing the landscape of hypertension management in Sigel, Pennsylvania (ZIP code 15860) necessitates a multi-faceted approach. This assessment considers physician availability, practice characteristics, technological integration, and the integration of mental health resources, all critical components of effective hypertension care. The goal is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the strengths and weaknesses within this specific geographical area, ultimately informing patients and healthcare providers alike.
The foundation of any hypertension management strategy lies in accessible primary care. In Sigel, assessing primary care availability is paramount. This involves evaluating the physician-to-patient ratio, a key indicator of access. A high ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and potentially, delayed diagnoses or treatment adjustments. Conversely, a low ratio suggests greater accessibility and potentially, better patient outcomes. Research into the specific physician-to-patient ratio within 15860 is crucial. Data from sources like the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) or local health departments would be invaluable in quantifying this aspect of care.
Beyond the raw number of physicians, the types of practices available significantly impact the quality of hypertension care. Are there solo practitioners, multi-specialty groups, or affiliations with larger healthcare systems? Multi-specialty groups often offer a broader range of services, including cardiology, nephrology, and endocrinology, which are crucial for managing complex hypertension cases. Affiliations with larger systems can provide access to advanced diagnostic tools, specialized expertise, and integrated electronic health records (EHRs), facilitating better communication and coordination of care. Investigating the organizational structures of practices within Sigel will reveal the potential for comprehensive hypertension management.
Identifying standout practices within the community is also important. These practices may demonstrate excellence in patient education, medication management, lifestyle counseling, and patient follow-up. They might utilize evidence-based guidelines, participate in quality improvement initiatives, and actively engage patients in their care. Identifying these practices requires examining patient reviews, analyzing performance metrics (if available), and potentially, conducting interviews with local healthcare professionals. This information can highlight best practices and serve as a model for other providers.
The adoption of telemedicine is a critical factor in modern hypertension management, particularly in rural areas like Sigel. Telemedicine offers the potential to improve access to care, reduce travel burdens for patients, and facilitate remote monitoring of blood pressure and other vital signs. Assessing the extent of telemedicine adoption within the local practices is crucial. Do physicians offer virtual consultations, remote blood pressure monitoring programs, or online patient portals? Practices that embrace telemedicine can potentially improve patient engagement, adherence to treatment plans, and overall outcomes.
The often-overlooked connection between mental health and hypertension is another critical consideration. Chronic stress, anxiety, and depression can significantly impact blood pressure control. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources within the community is a crucial factor. Does the area have access to psychiatrists, psychologists, therapists, and support groups? Are these resources integrated into the primary care practices, allowing for seamless referrals and coordinated care? Practices that recognize and address the mental health needs of their patients are better positioned to achieve optimal hypertension control.
The integration of these factors creates a comprehensive “Hypertension Score” analysis. This score is not a single number but a composite assessment based on the physician-to-patient ratio, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources. Each component is assigned a weight based on its relative importance in achieving optimal hypertension management. The final score reflects the overall quality and accessibility of hypertension care within the specified geographical area.
The analysis should also consider the specific demographics of the population served. Are there any specific risk factors prevalent within the community, such as a high prevalence of obesity, diabetes, or other cardiovascular diseases? Understanding the unique needs of the population is crucial for tailoring hypertension management strategies effectively.
The analysis should also assess the availability of patient education resources. Are there programs that teach patients about healthy lifestyle choices, medication management, and self-monitoring techniques? Patient education is a cornerstone of effective hypertension control, and the availability of these resources can significantly impact patient outcomes.
Furthermore, the analysis should examine the use of electronic health records (EHRs) within the practices. EHRs facilitate better communication between healthcare providers, improve the accuracy of medical records, and enable the tracking of patient outcomes. Practices that effectively utilize EHRs are better positioned to provide coordinated and comprehensive care.
Finally, the analysis should assess the availability of community resources that support healthy lifestyles. Are there walking trails, farmers' markets, or other resources that encourage physical activity and healthy eating? These resources can play a crucial role in preventing and managing hypertension.
In conclusion, a thorough "Hypertension Score" analysis for Sigel, PA (ZIP code 15860) requires a detailed examination of physician availability, practice characteristics, technological integration, mental health resources, and community support. This multifaceted approach provides a comprehensive understanding of the strengths and weaknesses within the local healthcare system. This assessment is essential for patients seeking optimal hypertension care and for healthcare providers striving to improve their services.
For a visual representation of this data, including geographical mapping of physician locations, practice types, and resource availability, we encourage you to explore the power of CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can provide an interactive and informative view of the healthcare landscape in Sigel, PA, and beyond.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like