16111, Atlantic, Pennsylvania Hypertension Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 16111, Atlantic, Pennsylvania is 62 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 72.72 percent of the residents in 16111 has some form of health insurance. 30.10 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 52.57 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16111 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 364 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16111. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 213 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,512 health care providers accessible to residents in 16111, Atlantic, Pennsylvania.

## Hypertension Score Analysis: ZIP Code 16111 & Atlantic Primary Care

This analysis delves into the landscape of hypertension management within ZIP Code 16111, focusing on the availability and quality of primary care services, with a comparative lens on the broader context of primary care accessibility in Atlantic. The goal is to provide a nuanced understanding of the resources available to individuals managing hypertension, considering factors like physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, technological integration, and the availability of mental health support.

ZIP Code 16111, likely representing a specific geographic area, requires a granular examination of its healthcare ecosystem. Assessing the “Hypertension Score” involves evaluating several key components. Firstly, the physician-to-patient ratio is crucial. A higher ratio of patients per primary care physician (PCP) can indicate potential challenges in accessing timely appointments and comprehensive care. Researching the actual patient load of PCPs within 16111 is paramount. This involves identifying the practicing PCPs and estimating their patient panels. Publicly available data from sources like the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) or state medical boards can be leveraged, though this information might not always be completely up-to-date or readily accessible.

Beyond simple numbers, the quality of care is a critical factor. This includes adherence to evidence-based guidelines for hypertension management. This involves assessing whether PCPs are routinely screening for hypertension, using appropriate diagnostic tools, prescribing medications according to established protocols, and providing patient education on lifestyle modifications (diet, exercise, smoking cessation). Data on these aspects is often gathered through patient surveys, electronic health record (EHR) reviews, and potentially, through partnerships with local health organizations. The adoption of EHRs is also important. Practices with robust EHR systems often have better data tracking capabilities, which can improve the monitoring of patient outcomes and the implementation of quality improvement initiatives.

Standout practices within 16111, if any, would be those demonstrating exceptional performance in hypertension management. This could be reflected in lower rates of uncontrolled hypertension, fewer cardiovascular events among patients, and high patient satisfaction scores. Identifying these practices requires a thorough review of available data and potentially, direct engagement with healthcare providers and patient advocacy groups. These practices could serve as models for others in the area, highlighting best practices and innovative approaches.

The role of telemedicine is increasingly important in hypertension management. Telemedicine offers opportunities for remote blood pressure monitoring, virtual consultations, and medication management. Evaluating the telemedicine adoption rate among PCPs in 16111 is essential. This involves determining which practices offer telemedicine services, the types of services offered (e.g., video visits, remote monitoring), and the patient utilization rates. Telemedicine can be particularly beneficial for patients with mobility limitations, transportation challenges, or those living in rural areas.

Mental health is inextricably linked to hypertension management. Chronic stress and mental health conditions like anxiety and depression can contribute to elevated blood pressure and complicate treatment adherence. Assessing the availability of mental health resources within 16111 is, therefore, crucial. This includes identifying the number of mental health providers (psychiatrists, psychologists, therapists) in the area, the availability of integrated behavioral health services within primary care practices, and the accessibility of mental health support programs for patients with hypertension. Integration of mental health services into primary care settings can improve patient outcomes by addressing the complex interplay between physical and mental health.

Comparing the primary care landscape of 16111 to the broader context of Atlantic is vital. Atlantic, presumably a larger geographic area, offers a comparative perspective on primary care accessibility. Analyzing the physician-to-patient ratio across Atlantic provides a benchmark for 16111. This comparison helps determine whether 16111 faces unique challenges or benefits from the broader healthcare infrastructure in Atlantic.

The availability of primary care in Atlantic must be assessed. This includes identifying the number of PCPs, the types of practices (e.g., solo practices, group practices, hospital-affiliated clinics), and the geographical distribution of these practices. This information can be obtained from healthcare directories, hospital websites, and state medical board data.

The quality of care in Atlantic should also be evaluated. This involves assessing adherence to hypertension management guidelines, the adoption of EHRs, and the availability of patient education resources. Data on these aspects can be gathered from patient surveys, EHR reviews, and potentially, through partnerships with local health organizations.

Telemedicine adoption rates in Atlantic should be compared to those in 16111. Are practices in Atlantic more or less likely to offer telemedicine services? Are patient utilization rates higher or lower? These comparisons can highlight best practices and areas for improvement.

The availability of mental health resources in Atlantic should also be assessed and compared to 16111. Are there more or fewer mental health providers in Atlantic? Are integrated behavioral health services more or less common? These comparisons can highlight disparities in access to care.

The overall “Hypertension Score” for 16111 is ultimately a composite measure, reflecting the interplay of these factors. A high score would indicate a well-resourced healthcare environment with a high physician-to-patient ratio, excellent adherence to guidelines, widespread telemedicine adoption, and robust mental health support. A lower score would indicate the opposite.

This analysis underscores the complexity of assessing healthcare access and quality. It requires a multifaceted approach, drawing on diverse data sources and a deep understanding of the local healthcare ecosystem. The insights gained can inform targeted interventions to improve hypertension management and, ultimately, patient health outcomes.

For visualizing the geographical distribution of healthcare resources, patient demographics, and health outcomes within 16111 and Atlantic, explore the powerful mapping capabilities of CartoChrome maps. Uncover spatial patterns and gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape.