The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 16211, Beyer, Pennsylvania is 48 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 16211 has some form of health insurance. 43.94 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 72.73 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16211 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 17 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16211. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 18 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 531 health care providers accessible to residents in 16211, Beyer, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 16211, Beyer, Pennsylvania
Hypertension Score | 75 |
---|---|
People Score | 83 |
Provider Score | 48 |
Hospital Score | 55 |
Travel Score | 43 |
16211 | Beyer | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis below assesses hypertension management capabilities for primary care physicians within ZIP code 16211, specifically focusing on the availability of care in Beyer, Pennsylvania. This evaluation considers physician-to-patient ratios, exemplary practices, telemedicine integration, and the presence of mental health resources, all crucial components of effective hypertension control.
The physician-to-patient ratio within ZIP code 16211 is a critical factor in determining access to care. A higher ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments and potentially delayed diagnoses or treatment adjustments for patients with hypertension. Conversely, a lower ratio suggests greater accessibility. Data analysis is necessary to ascertain the precise physician-to-patient ratio in this area. This requires examining the number of primary care physicians actively practicing within the ZIP code and comparing it to the population served. Public health databases, insurance provider information, and local medical society records are essential for this data gathering.
Evaluating standout practices requires a multi-faceted approach. It is important to identify those practices that demonstrate exceptional hypertension management. This involves reviewing patient outcomes, such as blood pressure control rates, and examining the utilization of evidence-based guidelines. Practices that actively participate in quality improvement initiatives, such as the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) recognition programs, often demonstrate a commitment to providing high-quality care. Furthermore, assessing patient satisfaction through surveys can provide valuable insights into the patient experience and the effectiveness of the practice's approach to hypertension management.
Telemedicine adoption is rapidly changing healthcare delivery, and its impact on hypertension management is significant. Practices that have embraced telemedicine, offering virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and medication management, can improve access to care, especially for patients with mobility issues or those living in rural areas. The availability of remote blood pressure monitoring devices, integrated with telemedicine platforms, allows physicians to track patient progress and make timely adjustments to treatment plans. Examining the extent of telemedicine integration within practices in 16211, including the types of services offered and the number of patients utilizing these services, is crucial.
The integration of mental health resources into hypertension management is increasingly recognized as essential. Stress and mental health conditions, such as anxiety and depression, can significantly impact blood pressure levels. Practices that offer or have access to mental health services, either through in-house providers or referral networks, can provide comprehensive care. Assessing the availability of these resources, including the presence of psychologists, psychiatrists, or licensed clinical social workers, and the ease of access for patients, is important.
The specific availability of primary care in Beyer, Pennsylvania, a community within ZIP code 16211, requires a localized assessment. This involves identifying the primary care practices located within Beyer and evaluating their capacity to serve the local population. Factors to consider include the number of physicians, the hours of operation, the types of insurance accepted, and the availability of same-day appointments. Analyzing patient testimonials and online reviews can also provide insights into the quality of care provided by these practices.
To conduct a thorough analysis, data collection is essential. This includes obtaining information on the number of primary care physicians practicing within 16211, the patient populations they serve, and their affiliations with hospitals or health systems. Public health databases, insurance provider directories, and local medical societies are valuable resources. Patient outcome data, such as blood pressure control rates, can be obtained through insurance claims data or practice-specific quality reports. Information on telemedicine adoption and mental health resource integration can be gathered through practice surveys or interviews.
The analysis should also consider the socioeconomic factors that may influence hypertension management. These include the prevalence of chronic diseases, the rates of health insurance coverage, and the availability of healthy food options. Addressing these factors is crucial for improving hypertension outcomes.
The analysis should culminate in a ranking system for primary care physicians in 16211, based on their hypertension management capabilities. This ranking should consider the physician-to-patient ratio, the use of evidence-based guidelines, the adoption of telemedicine, the integration of mental health resources, and patient satisfaction. The ranking system should be transparent and easily understandable, allowing patients to make informed decisions about their care.
The final assessment should also include recommendations for improvement. These may include suggestions for increasing physician access, promoting the use of telemedicine, expanding mental health services, and implementing quality improvement initiatives. The recommendations should be tailored to the specific needs of the community and should be based on evidence-based practices.
The analysis should be presented in a clear and concise manner, using visual aids such as charts and graphs to illustrate key findings. The report should be easily accessible to both healthcare professionals and the general public. The goal is to provide a comprehensive overview of hypertension management in 16211, empowering patients to make informed decisions about their health and promoting improvements in the quality of care.
For a more detailed visual representation of this data, including geographic mapping of physician locations, patient demographics, and access to care, we invite you to explore CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps offer a powerful tool for understanding the healthcare landscape in 16211 and beyond.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like