The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 16233, Leeper, Pennsylvania is 38 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 92.92 percent of the residents in 16233 has some form of health insurance. 37.26 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 74.52 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16233 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 206 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16233. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 274 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 407 health care providers accessible to residents in 16233, Leeper, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 16233, Leeper, Pennsylvania
Hypertension Score | 28 |
---|---|
People Score | 38 |
Provider Score | 38 |
Hospital Score | 59 |
Travel Score | 25 |
16233 | Leeper | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Hypertension Score Analysis: Leeper, PA (ZIP Code 16233)
This analysis provides an overview of the hypertension management landscape in and around Leeper, Pennsylvania (ZIP Code 16233), focusing on primary care availability and resources relevant to effective hypertension control. The goal is to assess the current state of care, highlighting strengths and weaknesses, and offering insights for improvement.
The foundation of effective hypertension management lies within the primary care setting. In Leeper, the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) directly impacts access to screening, diagnosis, and ongoing treatment. A critical metric is the physician-to-patient ratio. While precise figures fluctuate, the rural nature of the area suggests a potential challenge in this regard. A limited number of PCPs serving a geographically dispersed population could lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced patient contact, and potentially, delayed diagnosis or inadequate follow-up care. This impacts the ability to provide timely interventions, such as lifestyle counseling and medication management, which are crucial for hypertension control.
Standout practices within the area, if any, would likely demonstrate a commitment to proactive hypertension management. This might involve implementing standardized protocols for blood pressure screening, employing electronic health records (EHRs) to track patient data and facilitate medication adherence, and offering patient education materials. Practices that actively engage patients in their care, emphasizing self-monitoring and lifestyle modifications, are likely to achieve better outcomes. Identifying these exemplary practices would require a deeper dive into their operational procedures and patient outcomes.
Telemedicine adoption is another critical factor. The geographical challenges of rural healthcare settings make telemedicine particularly valuable. Remote blood pressure monitoring, virtual consultations, and online patient education resources can significantly improve access to care and support patient self-management. Practices that have embraced telemedicine, offering virtual appointments and remote monitoring capabilities, are better positioned to serve a wider patient population and provide more frequent check-ins, which is vital for hypertension management. The availability of reliable internet access in the area, however, is a potential limiting factor for telemedicine adoption.
The connection between mental health and hypertension is increasingly recognized. Stress, anxiety, and depression can significantly impact blood pressure levels and adherence to treatment plans. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources is a crucial component of comprehensive hypertension care. The analysis must consider the presence of mental health professionals in the area, including psychiatrists, psychologists, and licensed therapists. Furthermore, the integration of mental health services within primary care practices is a key indicator of a patient-centered approach. Practices that offer on-site mental health services or have established referral pathways for mental health support are better equipped to address the holistic needs of their patients.
Beyond the immediate clinical setting, the broader community plays a role in hypertension management. Access to healthy food options, opportunities for physical activity, and community-based health education programs can significantly impact patient outcomes. The analysis should consider the availability of resources such as farmers' markets, walking trails, and community health initiatives that promote healthy lifestyles. Collaboration between healthcare providers and community organizations is essential for creating a supportive environment for patients with hypertension.
Another element to consider is the availability of specialized care. While primary care forms the cornerstone of hypertension management, patients with complex cases or uncontrolled blood pressure may require referral to specialists, such as cardiologists or nephrologists. The proximity of these specialists and the ease of referral pathways are important factors. Long wait times for specialist appointments or limited specialist availability can hinder timely intervention and complicate patient management.
The use of data analytics can be a powerful tool for improving hypertension management. Practices that utilize data to track patient outcomes, identify trends, and tailor interventions are more likely to achieve positive results. Analyzing data on blood pressure control rates, medication adherence, and patient satisfaction can help identify areas for improvement and guide the implementation of evidence-based practices. The ability of practices to leverage data analytics is a key indicator of their commitment to quality improvement.
The effectiveness of hypertension management also depends on patient education and engagement. Patients who are well-informed about their condition, understand their treatment plan, and actively participate in their care are more likely to achieve optimal blood pressure control. Practices that provide patients with clear and concise information, offer self-management tools, and encourage patient-provider communication are better positioned to empower patients to take control of their health.
Finally, the regulatory environment and payer policies can influence hypertension management. The availability of affordable medications, the reimbursement rates for hypertension-related services, and the implementation of quality improvement initiatives by payers can all impact the quality of care provided. Understanding the local regulatory landscape and payer policies is essential for assessing the overall environment for hypertension management.
In conclusion, the hypertension management landscape in and around Leeper, PA (ZIP Code 16233) is shaped by a complex interplay of factors, including primary care availability, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, community support, and patient engagement. A comprehensive assessment requires a detailed examination of these elements to identify areas for improvement and ensure that patients receive the best possible care.
For a comprehensive visual representation of the healthcare landscape in Leeper, including physician locations, access to resources, and demographic data, we encourage you to explore the power of CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome offers interactive visualizations that can help you gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare environment and identify opportunities for improvement.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like