The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 16436, Spring Creek, Pennsylvania is 34 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 92.88 percent of the residents in 16436 has some form of health insurance. 65.17 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 48.31 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16436 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 206 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16436. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 225 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 135 health care providers accessible to residents in 16436, Spring Creek, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 16436, Spring Creek, Pennsylvania
Hypertension Score | 26 |
---|---|
People Score | 41 |
Provider Score | 34 |
Hospital Score | 38 |
Travel Score | 43 |
16436 | Spring Creek | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis below provides an assessment of hypertension management capabilities and primary care access within ZIP Code 16436, focusing on Spring Creek, Pennsylvania. This evaluation considers physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine integration, and the availability of mental health resources, all critical components in controlling and treating hypertension.
Assessing the landscape of healthcare in Spring Creek begins with understanding the physician-to-patient ratio. A lower ratio, indicating more physicians per capita, generally suggests better access to care. Data on this metric requires careful consideration. While precise figures are often proprietary, publicly available sources like the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) can provide estimates. These estimates, however, may not reflect the actual availability of primary care physicians actively accepting new patients or specializing in hypertension management.
The presence of standout practices significantly influences the quality of hypertension care. Practices with a proven track record of successful hypertension control, as measured by patient outcomes and adherence to clinical guidelines, are crucial. These practices often distinguish themselves through their commitment to patient education, proactive monitoring, and personalized treatment plans. Identifying such practices requires a review of patient reviews, physician referrals, and potentially, publicly available quality metrics, if available.
Telemedicine adoption is another key factor. The ability to offer virtual consultations and remote monitoring tools can enhance access to care, particularly for patients with mobility limitations or those residing in geographically remote areas. Practices that have embraced telemedicine can provide more frequent check-ins, medication adjustments, and educational support, all of which contribute to improved hypertension management. The extent of telemedicine integration, including the types of platforms used and the services offered, needs to be assessed.
Mental health resources are an often-overlooked aspect of hypertension management, but they are critically important. Stress and anxiety can significantly elevate blood pressure, and addressing these underlying issues is essential for long-term control. The availability of mental health professionals, such as therapists and psychiatrists, and the integration of mental health services within primary care practices are crucial. Practices that recognize the link between mental and physical health and offer integrated care are more likely to achieve positive patient outcomes.
Specific details regarding physician-to-patient ratios within 16436 require data from local healthcare providers and potentially, state health departments. The HRSA provides general estimates, but a more granular analysis would involve contacting local primary care practices to determine their patient load and their capacity to accept new patients. This data collection is essential for a precise assessment of access to care.
The identification of standout practices requires a multi-faceted approach. Patient reviews, available through online platforms and patient surveys, provide valuable insights into patient experiences and satisfaction. Physician referrals, if available, can highlight practices that are respected by their peers. Furthermore, an examination of practices’ websites and promotional materials can reveal their commitment to evidence-based hypertension management and patient education.
Telemedicine adoption varies across practices. Some may offer virtual consultations, while others may utilize remote monitoring devices to track blood pressure and other vital signs. The sophistication of the telemedicine platform, the types of services offered, and the ease of use for both patients and physicians are important considerations. Practices that have successfully integrated telemedicine into their workflow are better positioned to provide convenient and accessible care.
The integration of mental health resources within primary care practices is a key indicator of comprehensive care. Practices that offer on-site mental health services or have established referral networks with mental health professionals are better equipped to address the psychological factors that can contribute to hypertension. The availability of these resources, along with patient education on stress management techniques, is essential for holistic care.
The analysis of primary care availability in Spring Creek must consider the geographic distribution of primary care practices, their hours of operation, and their ability to accommodate new patients. Access to care is not just about the number of physicians; it is also about the convenience and affordability of care. Practices that offer extended hours, accept various insurance plans, and provide financial assistance programs are more accessible to a wider range of patients.
The specific practices in Spring Creek, and their characteristics, are crucial to the overall assessment. Research should focus on the practices' websites, patient reviews, and information available from healthcare directories. This information should be used to determine the services offered, the technology used, and the commitment to patient education and preventative care.
The availability of specialists, such as cardiologists and nephrologists, is another important factor. While primary care physicians are the first point of contact for hypertension management, patients with complex cases may require the expertise of specialists. The proximity of specialists and the ease of referral processes are critical for ensuring timely and appropriate care.
The overall assessment of hypertension management capabilities in Spring Creek should consider all these factors. The physician-to-patient ratio, the characteristics of standout practices, the extent of telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources all contribute to the quality and accessibility of care. A comprehensive analysis will provide a clear picture of the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system and inform efforts to improve hypertension management outcomes.
For a detailed, visual representation of healthcare access, physician locations, and practice characteristics in Spring Creek, consider using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can provide a dynamic and interactive way to explore the healthcare landscape of ZIP Code 16436.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like