Hypertension Score

17056, Mexico, Pennsylvania Hypertension Score Provider Score

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 stars

0 Reviews

Health Scores

Provider Score in 17056, Mexico, Pennsylvania

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 17056, Mexico, Pennsylvania is 29 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 25.71 percent of the residents in 17056 has some form of health insurance. 11.43 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 14.29 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 17056 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 0 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 9 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 17056. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 0 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,610 health care providers accessible to residents in 17056, Mexico, Pennsylvania.

Health Scores in 17056, Mexico, Pennsylvania

Hypertension Score 67
People Score 91
Provider Score 29
Hospital Score 77
Travel Score 19

Provider Type in a 20-Mile Radius

17056 Mexico Pennsylvania
Providers per 10,000 residents 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 0.00 0.00 0.00

Provider Score Review of 17056, Mexico, Pennsylvania

## Hypertension Score Analysis: Comparing 17056 Physicians and Mexican Primary Care

This analysis aims to evaluate and compare the landscape of hypertension management, focusing on two distinct geographical contexts: physicians practicing in ZIP Code 17056 (Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania, USA) and the availability of primary care services in Mexico. We will examine factors crucial to effective hypertension control, including physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources. This comparative approach allows for a nuanced understanding of the challenges and opportunities in providing accessible and comprehensive care for individuals with hypertension in these very different settings.

In ZIP Code 17056, the availability of primary care physicians is a critical factor. Determining an accurate physician-to-patient ratio requires access to up-to-date data, including the number of practicing primary care physicians (PCPs), the population of the ZIP code, and the patient panel sizes of individual practices. Publicly available data from the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) and state medical boards can provide initial estimates. However, these figures often need refinement through local surveys or data from insurance providers to capture the most accurate picture. A higher physician-to-patient ratio (fewer patients per physician) generally indicates better access to care, potentially leading to improved hypertension management through more frequent check-ups, medication adjustments, and patient education.

Identifying standout practices within 17056 requires a multi-faceted approach. We would need to analyze patient outcomes data, such as the percentage of patients achieving blood pressure control, the rates of complications (e.g., stroke, heart attack), and patient satisfaction scores. Furthermore, we should consider the adoption of evidence-based practices, such as the use of standardized protocols for hypertension management, the implementation of patient education programs, and the integration of lifestyle interventions (e.g., dietary counseling, exercise programs). Practices that actively participate in quality improvement initiatives and demonstrate a commitment to patient-centered care are likely to be leading the way in hypertension management.

Telemedicine adoption has the potential to significantly impact hypertension care in 17056, especially in terms of increasing access to care and improving patient adherence. Telemedicine can facilitate virtual consultations, remote blood pressure monitoring, and medication management. The extent of telemedicine adoption varies among practices. Some practices might use it for follow-up appointments, medication refills, and patient education. Others might offer more comprehensive telehealth services, including remote blood pressure monitoring and virtual chronic disease management programs. The success of telemedicine depends on factors such as internet access, patient digital literacy, and the availability of reimbursement for telehealth services.

The integration of mental health resources is increasingly recognized as crucial for hypertension management. Stress, anxiety, and depression can significantly impact blood pressure and medication adherence. Practices in 17056 that integrate mental health services, either through in-house therapists or referrals to mental health specialists, are likely to provide more comprehensive and effective care. This integration can involve screening for mental health conditions, providing brief counseling interventions, and coordinating care with mental health professionals.

Shifting our focus to Mexico, the landscape of primary care availability presents a different set of challenges and opportunities. The physician-to-patient ratio varies significantly across different regions of Mexico, with rural areas often experiencing a shortage of healthcare professionals. Data from the Mexican Ministry of Health (Secretaría de Salud) and the World Health Organization (WHO) can provide insights into physician distribution and overall healthcare resource allocation. Access to primary care services is often influenced by factors such as socioeconomic status, geographic location, and the availability of public and private healthcare options.

Evaluating standout practices in Mexico requires considering the context of the healthcare system. Factors such as the availability of resources, the prevalence of chronic diseases, and the cultural norms of healthcare delivery play a significant role. Practices that demonstrate innovation in resource-constrained settings, such as the use of community health workers, mobile clinics, and telemedicine to reach underserved populations, are likely to be making a significant impact. Furthermore, practices that prioritize patient education and community engagement are likely to be more effective in promoting healthy lifestyles and preventing complications.

Telemedicine adoption in Mexico presents both opportunities and challenges. Telemedicine can help bridge the gap in access to care, especially in rural and remote areas. However, factors such as internet connectivity, the availability of technology, and the digital literacy of both patients and healthcare providers need to be addressed. The Mexican government has been actively promoting telemedicine initiatives, but the implementation and effectiveness of these programs vary across different regions.

The integration of mental health resources in Mexican primary care is crucial, given the high prevalence of mental health conditions and the impact of stress on overall health. However, mental health services are often under-resourced and not fully integrated into primary care. Practices that prioritize mental health screening, provide brief counseling interventions, and establish referral pathways to mental health specialists are likely to be providing more comprehensive care. Collaboration between primary care physicians and mental health professionals is essential to address the complex needs of patients with hypertension and co-existing mental health conditions.

Comparing the two settings, we observe stark contrasts. 17056, with its access to advanced healthcare infrastructure and resources, has the potential to leverage technology and evidence-based practices to optimize hypertension management. Mexico, on the other hand, faces greater challenges related to resource constraints, geographic disparities, and the need to address social determinants of health. Both settings, however, share the common goal of improving patient outcomes and reducing the burden of hypertension. Successful hypertension management requires a multi-faceted approach that includes early detection, effective treatment, patient education, lifestyle interventions, and the integration of mental health resources.

To further explore the geographical distribution of healthcare resources, patient demographics, and other relevant factors, consider utilizing the powerful mapping capabilities of CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps allows for a visual representation of data, helping to identify patterns, trends, and disparities in healthcare access and outcomes.

Reviews

Recent Reviews

No reviews yet.

Leave a review
Health Scores Near 17056, Mexico, Pennsylvania

You may also like

17059, Mifflintown, Pennsylvania
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 17056: 2.94 Miles

Total Population:

17058, Mifflin, Pennsylvania
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 17056: 3.60 Miles

Total Population:

17082, Port Royal, Pennsylvania
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 17056: 3.60 Miles

Total Population:

17076, Oakland Mills, Pennsylvania
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 17056: 6.05 Miles

Total Population:

17094, Thompsontown, Pennsylvania
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 17056: 6.26 Miles

Total Population:

17037, Ickesburg, Pennsylvania
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 17056: 7.01 Miles

Total Population:

17035, Honey Grove, Pennsylvania
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 17056: 7.53 Miles

Total Population:

17024, Elliottsburg, Pennsylvania
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 17056: 7.80 Miles

Total Population:

17049, Mc Alisterville, Pennsylvania
Hypertension Score
Hypertension Score

Distance from 17056: 9.29 Miles

Total Population:

Health Scores in 17056, Mexico, Pennsylvania