The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 17087, Richland, Pennsylvania is 79 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 75.58 percent of the residents in 17087 has some form of health insurance. 24.19 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 61.98 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 17087 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 720 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 17087. An estimate of 2 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 424 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 3,852 health care providers accessible to residents in 17087, Richland, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 17087, Richland, Pennsylvania
Hypertension Score | 92 |
---|---|
People Score | 54 |
Provider Score | 79 |
Hospital Score | 63 |
Travel Score | 70 |
17087 | Richland | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Hypertension Score Analysis: ZIP Code 17087 & Richland Primary Care
Analyzing hypertension management within ZIP Code 17087, which encompasses Richland, requires a multi-faceted approach. This analysis will evaluate the quality of primary care available, focusing on factors directly impacting hypertension control and patient outcomes. This includes physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources. The goal is to provide a comprehensive overview of the current landscape and identify areas for improvement.
The physician-to-patient ratio serves as a foundational metric. A high ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and potentially compromised preventative care. Conversely, a lower ratio suggests greater accessibility. In Richland, the specific physician-to-patient ratio needs to be assessed using publicly available data sources. This data would be drawn from state medical boards, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), and potentially local hospital systems. The analysis will then compare this ratio to regional and national averages to determine Richland's relative position.
Identifying standout practices is crucial. This involves looking beyond basic metrics and examining the quality of care delivery. Practices excelling in hypertension management often implement evidence-based guidelines, such as those from the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology. They may utilize standardized protocols for blood pressure monitoring, medication management, and patient education. Success can be measured through metrics like the percentage of hypertensive patients achieving blood pressure control, rates of cardiovascular events (heart attacks, strokes), and patient satisfaction scores. Information on these metrics would need to be sourced from publicly available quality reports, patient reviews, and potentially direct outreach to local practices.
Telemedicine adoption plays an increasingly important role. Telemedicine offers the potential to expand access to care, particularly for patients in rural or underserved areas. It allows for remote blood pressure monitoring, medication adjustments, and virtual consultations. Practices actively utilizing telemedicine for hypertension management are likely to have better patient outcomes, especially if coupled with patient education programs. The analysis will investigate the extent of telemedicine adoption among Richland primary care providers, evaluating the types of services offered, the platforms used, and patient satisfaction with these services.
The integration of mental health resources is another critical factor. Hypertension is often linked to stress, anxiety, and depression. Patients with these conditions may struggle to adhere to treatment plans, leading to poorer blood pressure control. Primary care practices that incorporate mental health services, either through in-house providers or referrals to external specialists, are better equipped to address the holistic needs of their patients. This analysis will assess the availability of mental health services within Richland primary care practices, including the presence of on-site therapists, partnerships with mental health providers, and the use of screening tools for mental health conditions.
Specific practices within Richland would be evaluated based on their performance across these key areas. For example, a practice with a low physician-to-patient ratio, strong patient education programs, active telemedicine utilization, and integrated mental health services would likely receive a higher Hypertension Score. Conversely, a practice with a high ratio, limited telemedicine, and a lack of mental health resources would receive a lower score. The analysis will aim to identify practices that are demonstrating best practices in hypertension management.
Data sources for this analysis are varied. Publicly available information, such as CMS quality reports and state medical board data, will provide a baseline understanding of physician availability and practice performance. Patient reviews and online resources like Healthgrades and Vitals can offer insights into patient experiences and satisfaction. Direct outreach to local primary care practices, through questionnaires or interviews, could provide more detailed information on their specific programs and services.
The analysis will also consider the demographics of the population served by the primary care practices in Richland. Factors such as age, race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status can influence hypertension prevalence and management. The analysis will account for these factors to provide a more nuanced understanding of the challenges and opportunities in hypertension control within the community.
The ultimate goal is to provide a comprehensive Hypertension Score for the primary care landscape in ZIP Code 17087. This score will be based on a weighted average of the factors discussed above, with each factor assigned a weight based on its relative importance. The final score will reflect the overall quality of hypertension management within the community, highlighting both strengths and weaknesses. This information can then be used to inform targeted interventions, such as quality improvement initiatives, patient education campaigns, and efforts to increase access to care.
The analysis will also consider the impact of social determinants of health. These factors, such as access to healthy food, safe housing, and transportation, can significantly influence hypertension outcomes. The analysis will examine the availability of resources to address these social determinants within the community. This could include partnerships with food banks, community health centers, and other organizations.
The final Hypertension Score will be a dynamic measure, reflecting the ongoing efforts of primary care practices to improve hypertension management. Regular updates to the score will be necessary to track progress and identify areas where further improvement is needed. The data will be presented in a clear and concise format, making it easy for patients, providers, and policymakers to understand the current state of hypertension management in Richland.
The findings of this analysis can be used to inform various stakeholders. Patients can use the information to make informed choices about their healthcare providers. Physicians can use the data to benchmark their performance against other practices and identify areas for improvement. Policymakers can use the information to allocate resources effectively and develop targeted interventions to address the challenges of hypertension in the community.
This detailed analysis, encompassing physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and mental health integration, will provide a robust understanding of hypertension management in Richland. Further exploration using advanced mapping tools can visualize this data.
**For a visual representation of the primary care landscape in Richland, including practice locations, physician density, and other relevant data points, explore the interactive maps available from CartoChrome.**
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like