The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 17306, Bendersville, Pennsylvania is 38 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 92.23 percent of the residents in 17306 has some form of health insurance. 28.62 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 78.45 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 17306 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 105 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 5 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 17306. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 107 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 3,871 health care providers accessible to residents in 17306, Bendersville, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 17306, Bendersville, Pennsylvania
Hypertension Score | 65 |
---|---|
People Score | 48 |
Provider Score | 38 |
Hospital Score | 68 |
Travel Score | 60 |
17306 | Bendersville | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The following analysis examines the landscape of hypertension care within ZIP code 17306 (Bendersville, Pennsylvania) and the surrounding primary care availability, focusing on factors relevant to a hypothetical "Hypertension Score" for local physicians. This score would reflect the effectiveness of care delivered to patients managing high blood pressure. The analysis considers physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine integration, and the availability of mental health resources, all crucial components of comprehensive hypertension management.
Physician-to-patient ratios in Bendersville and the immediate vicinity are a critical starting point. A high ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can strain access to care, potentially delaying diagnosis and treatment initiation. Conversely, a lower ratio suggests greater accessibility. Data from the Pennsylvania Department of Health and publicly available sources, such as the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA), would be essential to determine the specific ratio. This information helps gauge the overall capacity of the healthcare system to address the needs of the population, particularly those with chronic conditions like hypertension.
Standout practices within the area would likely demonstrate a commitment to evidence-based hypertension management. This includes adherence to current guidelines from organizations like the American Heart Association (AHA) and the American College of Cardiology (ACC). Practices scoring well would likely implement standardized protocols for blood pressure measurement, regular monitoring, and medication management. They might also utilize electronic health records (EHRs) to track patient progress, identify those at risk, and facilitate communication between providers.
The adoption of telemedicine is a significant factor in modern hypertension care. Telemedicine allows for remote blood pressure monitoring, virtual consultations, and medication adjustments. Practices actively using telemedicine can improve patient convenience, especially for those with mobility limitations or transportation challenges. Furthermore, telemedicine can facilitate more frequent check-ins, leading to better adherence to treatment plans and improved blood pressure control. The "Hypertension Score" would reward practices that embrace telemedicine as a tool to enhance patient engagement and outcomes.
Mental health resources are inextricably linked to hypertension management. Stress and anxiety can significantly elevate blood pressure, and addressing these issues is vital for comprehensive care. Practices that integrate mental health services, either through in-house therapists or referrals to external providers, would score higher. This integration demonstrates a holistic approach to patient well-being, recognizing the complex interplay between physical and mental health. Access to mental health support can empower patients to manage their stress, improve their lifestyle choices, and ultimately achieve better blood pressure control.
Specific practice examples are difficult to provide without real-world data, but the "Hypertension Score" would reward practices with certain characteristics. A practice demonstrating strong patient education programs, offering educational materials on lifestyle modifications (diet, exercise, smoking cessation), would be highly valued. Similarly, a practice that actively engages patients in shared decision-making, involving them in treatment choices, would receive a positive assessment. Practices that utilize patient portals for communication and provide 24/7 access to a nurse or on-call physician would be considered exemplary.
Another critical aspect is the practice's data-driven approach. Practices that regularly audit their hypertension management outcomes, tracking metrics such as the percentage of patients achieving blood pressure goals, would demonstrate a commitment to continuous improvement. This data-driven approach allows for identification of areas for improvement and the implementation of targeted interventions to optimize patient care. The "Hypertension Score" would give considerable weight to practices that can demonstrate measurable improvements in patient outcomes.
Furthermore, the "Hypertension Score" would consider the availability of support staff, such as certified diabetes educators (CDEs) and registered dietitians (RDs). These professionals can provide specialized education and support to patients, helping them make lifestyle changes that are crucial for hypertension management. The presence of a dedicated care team, working collaboratively to support patients, is a hallmark of high-quality hypertension care.
The geographic distribution of primary care physicians in relation to the population of Bendersville is another essential consideration. Are there areas within the ZIP code or the surrounding region that are underserved, lacking adequate access to primary care? The "Hypertension Score" would account for this, recognizing that patients in areas with limited access may face greater challenges in obtaining timely and consistent care. This might involve analyzing the travel times to various practices, the availability of public transportation, and the presence of any language barriers.
The availability of after-hours care is also a factor. Hypertension management requires consistent monitoring, and patients need access to care when they experience urgent symptoms or have questions. Practices that offer extended hours, weekend appointments, or after-hours phone support would be viewed favorably. This availability ensures that patients can receive timely care and avoid unnecessary trips to the emergency room.
The "Hypertension Score" would not be a static measure. It would require regular updates to reflect changes in practice patterns, the adoption of new technologies, and the evolving needs of the patient population. The score should also be transparent, with the criteria and methodology clearly defined and readily available to the public. This transparency would promote accountability and encourage continuous improvement in the quality of hypertension care.
In conclusion, assessing the quality of hypertension care in Bendersville (ZIP code 17306) requires a multifaceted approach. It involves evaluating physician-to-patient ratios, the characteristics of individual practices, the integration of telemedicine and mental health resources, and the availability of support staff and after-hours care. A well-designed "Hypertension Score" can provide valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system, ultimately helping patients make informed decisions about their care.
To visualize the geographic distribution of physicians, their specialties, and the availability of resources, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps can provide a powerful visual representation of the healthcare landscape, helping you to better understand the accessibility of care and identify areas for improvement.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like