17311, Codorus, Pennsylvania Hypertension Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 17311, Codorus, Pennsylvania is 73 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 90.48 percent of the residents in 17311 has some form of health insurance. 45.24 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 69.64 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 17311 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 6 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 5 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 17311. An estimate of 2 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 54 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 3,982 health care providers accessible to residents in 17311, Codorus, Pennsylvania.

**Hypertension Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 17311 and Primary Care Availability in Codorus**

The analysis below provides an assessment of primary care resources within ZIP code 17311, focusing specifically on factors relevant to hypertension management. This includes physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption rates, and the availability of mental health resources, all crucial components for effective patient care. The geographic scope is further refined to include the town of Codorus, Pennsylvania, highlighting the local context.

The foundation of any robust healthcare system is its accessibility. In 17311, the physician-to-patient ratio serves as a critical indicator. Data analysis should reveal the number of primary care physicians (PCPs) actively practicing within the ZIP code, alongside the estimated population. A favorable ratio, indicating a greater number of PCPs per capita, generally translates to easier access to appointments, shorter wait times, and improved opportunities for preventative care, all vital for early hypertension detection and management. Conversely, a high ratio suggests potential challenges in accessing timely care, potentially leading to delayed diagnoses and inadequate treatment. This ratio is further influenced by factors like physician specialization and the presence of support staff.

Identifying standout practices within the area is also important. This involves looking beyond mere numbers and evaluating the quality of care provided. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to hypertension management often implement evidence-based guidelines, offer comprehensive patient education programs, and utilize advanced diagnostic tools. Practices that prioritize patient satisfaction and consistently achieve positive health outcomes, such as controlled blood pressure levels, should be highlighted. They may also incorporate innovative approaches, such as patient-centered medical homes, which provide coordinated care and improve patient engagement. Their success can serve as a model for other practices in the region.

Telemedicine adoption, particularly in the context of hypertension, has become increasingly relevant. The ability to remotely monitor patients, conduct virtual consultations, and provide medication management support can significantly improve access to care, especially for those in rural areas or with mobility limitations. The analysis should assess the extent to which practices in 17311 have embraced telemedicine technologies. This includes evaluating the availability of virtual appointments, remote blood pressure monitoring devices, and secure online portals for patient communication. Practices that effectively integrate telemedicine into their workflow are likely to offer more convenient and accessible care options for patients with hypertension.

The interconnectedness of physical and mental health is undeniable, and it is particularly relevant in the context of hypertension. Chronic stress, anxiety, and depression can significantly impact blood pressure levels and complicate treatment adherence. The analysis must examine the availability of mental health resources within the area. This includes the presence of psychiatrists, psychologists, therapists, and counselors, as well as the availability of mental health services within primary care practices. Practices that integrate mental health screening and treatment into their hypertension management programs are better positioned to provide holistic care and improve patient outcomes. Collaboration between PCPs and mental health professionals is essential for addressing the complex needs of patients.

The assessment of primary care availability in Codorus further refines the analysis. Codorus, as a specific locality within the broader ZIP code, may present unique challenges or opportunities. The analysis should consider factors such as the demographics of the population, the socioeconomic status of residents, and the availability of transportation. These factors can significantly influence access to care and the effectiveness of hypertension management programs. The analysis should also consider the presence of community resources, such as support groups, health education programs, and affordable medication options, which can play a vital role in supporting patients with hypertension.

Data collection should involve various sources. Publicly available data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), the Pennsylvania Department of Health, and the U.S. Census Bureau can provide valuable information on physician-to-patient ratios, demographics, and socioeconomic indicators. Direct outreach to primary care practices in 17311 is essential to gather information on telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and patient care practices. Patient surveys and interviews can provide valuable insights into patient experiences and satisfaction levels.

The final Hypertension Score should be a composite measure, reflecting the weighted average of the factors discussed above. The weighting of each factor should be based on its relative importance in hypertension management. For example, physician-to-patient ratio and the availability of mental health resources may be weighted more heavily than telemedicine adoption rates. The score should be presented in a clear and concise manner, allowing for easy comparison of different practices and the overall assessment of primary care availability in the area.

The analysis should also include specific recommendations for improvement. These may include suggestions for increasing the number of PCPs in the area, encouraging telemedicine adoption, promoting the integration of mental health services into primary care practices, and supporting community-based health education programs. The recommendations should be tailored to the specific needs of the community and should be based on evidence-based practices.

Ultimately, the goal of this analysis is to provide a comprehensive assessment of primary care resources in 17311, with a focus on hypertension management. By identifying strengths and weaknesses, this analysis can inform efforts to improve access to care, enhance the quality of care, and ultimately, improve the health outcomes of patients with hypertension in the Codorus area.
This analysis is designed to be a starting point for further investigation. For a detailed, interactive map visualizing physician locations, practice characteristics, and other relevant data, explore the possibilities offered by CartoChrome maps.