The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 17772, Turbotville, Pennsylvania is 98 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 91.68 percent of the residents in 17772 has some form of health insurance. 36.81 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 72.73 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 17772 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 492 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 34 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 17772. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 548 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 5,685 health care providers accessible to residents in 17772, Turbotville, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 17772, Turbotville, Pennsylvania
Hypertension Score | 96 |
---|---|
People Score | 66 |
Provider Score | 98 |
Hospital Score | 62 |
Travel Score | 60 |
17772 | Turbotville | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The evaluation of hypertension management capabilities within ZIP Code 17772, specifically focusing on the primary care landscape in Turbotville, requires a nuanced approach. We must consider various factors that contribute to effective hypertension control, including physician availability, practice characteristics, technology integration, and the availability of supporting mental health resources. This analysis culminates in a hypothetical "Hypertension Score" framework, providing a relative ranking of providers and the overall healthcare environment.
Physician-to-patient ratios form the bedrock of this assessment. A higher ratio of patients per primary care physician (PCP) can strain resources, potentially leading to less frequent monitoring and follow-up appointments, crucial for hypertension management. Conversely, a lower ratio suggests a greater capacity for individualized care and proactive intervention. Publicly available data, such as the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) data, can be used to estimate these ratios. The availability of specialists, such as cardiologists, within a reasonable travel distance is also a key consideration.
Standout practices within Turbotville and the surrounding areas, if any, warrant special attention. These practices might demonstrate superior hypertension control rates, employ innovative patient education programs, or actively participate in community health initiatives. Identifying these practices involves reviewing publicly available quality metrics, such as those reported to the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA), and analyzing patient testimonials and online reviews. The presence of certified diabetes educators (CDEs) or other specialized staff further enhances a practice's ability to manage hypertension effectively, given the frequent comorbidity of hypertension and diabetes.
Telemedicine adoption represents a critical element in modern healthcare delivery, particularly in rural settings like Turbotville. Telemedicine offers several advantages in hypertension management, including remote blood pressure monitoring, virtual consultations, and medication management. Practices that embrace telemedicine can improve patient access to care, reduce travel burdens, and enhance medication adherence. The "Hypertension Score" would reward practices that actively utilize telemedicine platforms, particularly those that integrate remote monitoring devices and patient portals.
The often-overlooked aspect of mental health plays a crucial role in hypertension management. Stress, anxiety, and depression can significantly impact blood pressure levels and adherence to treatment plans. The availability of mental health resources, either within the primary care practice or through readily accessible referrals, is therefore essential. Practices that integrate behavioral health specialists or offer mental health screenings and counseling services would receive higher scores. A practice's collaboration with local mental health providers, such as therapists or psychiatrists, would also be considered.
The "Hypertension Score" itself is a hypothetical construct, a weighted average of the factors described above. The weights assigned to each factor would reflect its relative importance in achieving optimal hypertension control. For example, physician-to-patient ratio might carry a significant weight, reflecting its fundamental impact on access to care. Telemedicine adoption might receive a moderate weight, acknowledging its potential to improve patient outcomes. Mental health integration would also be weighted, reflecting the bidirectional relationship between mental health and hypertension.
The scoring system could utilize a numerical scale, such as 1 to 100, with higher scores indicating better performance. Practices would be ranked based on their scores, allowing for a comparative analysis of their hypertension management capabilities. This ranking could be further refined by considering the specific demographics of the patient population served by each practice, such as age, race, and socioeconomic status.
Data collection for this analysis would involve a combination of publicly available information, such as HRSA data and NCQA reports, and potentially, direct inquiries to local primary care practices. This could involve surveying practices about their telemedicine capabilities, mental health resources, and hypertension control rates. Patient feedback, gathered through online reviews and surveys, would provide valuable insights into patient experiences and satisfaction.
The final "Hypertension Score" analysis would provide a valuable resource for both patients and healthcare providers. Patients could use the ranking to make informed decisions about their healthcare choices, selecting practices that offer the best potential for effective hypertension management. Healthcare providers could use the analysis to identify areas for improvement, benchmark their performance against their peers, and implement best practices.
The overall healthcare environment in Turbotville, and the surrounding areas within ZIP Code 17772, could be assessed based on the aggregated scores of the primary care practices. This could reveal strengths and weaknesses in the community's ability to manage hypertension. For example, a low overall score might indicate a shortage of primary care physicians, limited telemedicine adoption, or inadequate mental health resources. Conversely, a high overall score would suggest a strong healthcare infrastructure capable of effectively controlling hypertension.
The "Hypertension Score" analysis is not intended to be a definitive judgment of any particular practice. It is a relative ranking based on available data and a set of pre-defined criteria. The analysis would be regularly updated to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape, such as new telemedicine technologies, evolving best practices, and shifts in physician availability. The methodology and data sources would be transparently documented to ensure the integrity and reliability of the analysis.
The "Hypertension Score" analysis can be visualized using CartoChrome maps. These maps can display the geographic distribution of primary care practices, their "Hypertension Scores," and other relevant data, such as physician-to-patient ratios and telemedicine adoption rates. The maps would allow for a clear and concise presentation of the analysis, enabling users to easily identify areas of strength and weakness in the hypertension management landscape.
To visualize the landscape of primary care providers and their relative strengths in hypertension management within ZIP Code 17772, visit CartoChrome maps. Explore the data and make informed decisions about your healthcare.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like