17837, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania Hypertension Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 17837, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania is 96 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 87.10 percent of the residents in 17837 has some form of health insurance. 28.02 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 73.19 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 17837 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 3,632 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 35 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 17837. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 3,637 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 5,966 health care providers accessible to residents in 17837, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania.

The analysis below provides a hypertension score ranking for physicians within ZIP code 17837, focusing on primary care availability in Lewisburg, Pennsylvania. This evaluation considers factors impacting hypertension management, including physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine integration, and access to mental health resources. The goal is to offer a comprehensive view of the local healthcare landscape and its capacity to address hypertension effectively.

Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, a town in the Susquehanna Valley, presents a unique healthcare environment. The availability of primary care physicians is a critical factor in controlling hypertension. Early detection and consistent monitoring are vital for managing this condition, and the accessibility of primary care directly impacts these processes.

Physician-to-patient ratios are a crucial indicator of healthcare access. A high ratio, meaning fewer physicians serving a larger population, can lead to longer wait times for appointments and potentially less individualized care. In ZIP code 17837, the physician-to-patient ratio needs careful examination. Publicly available data from sources like the US Department of Health & Human Services or the Pennsylvania Department of Health would be necessary to accurately determine this ratio. This data would allow for a more informed understanding of the burden on existing primary care physicians.

Standout practices are those that demonstrate excellence in hypertension management. These practices often employ evidence-based guidelines, offer comprehensive patient education, and utilize innovative technologies. Identifying these practices involves looking at their patient outcomes, patient satisfaction scores, and the adoption of best practices. Examples of best practices include providing individualized treatment plans, regular blood pressure monitoring, and lifestyle counseling. Some practices may have earned recognition from organizations like the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) for their commitment to quality care.

Telemedicine adoption is another critical factor. Telemedicine allows patients to access healthcare services remotely, which can improve access to care, especially for those with mobility limitations or living in rural areas. The ability to monitor blood pressure remotely, conduct virtual consultations, and provide medication management via telemedicine can significantly improve hypertension control. Practices that have embraced telemedicine technologies are likely to have a higher score in this analysis.

Mental health resources are often overlooked in hypertension management, but they play a crucial role. Stress and anxiety can elevate blood pressure, and addressing these issues is essential for effective treatment. Practices that integrate mental health services into their care models, either through in-house therapists or referrals to mental health professionals, are better equipped to manage hypertension holistically. The availability of these resources would be considered when ranking the physicians in the area.

The analysis would begin by compiling a list of primary care physicians practicing within ZIP code 17837. Publicly available databases, insurance provider directories, and local healthcare directories would be used to create this initial list. Then, data would be collected on each physician and their practice.

The data collection would involve multiple steps. First, information on physician-to-patient ratios would be gathered. This would involve identifying the total number of primary care physicians in the area and estimating the population they serve. This information would be obtained from government data and healthcare databases.

Next, information on the adoption of best practices would be gathered. This would involve reviewing publicly available information on each practice, such as their website, patient reviews, and any accreditations they have received. Information on their use of evidence-based guidelines, patient education programs, and monitoring tools would be collected.

Telemedicine adoption would be assessed by determining which practices offer virtual consultations, remote blood pressure monitoring, and other telemedicine services. This information would be gathered by reviewing practice websites and contacting the practices directly.

The availability of mental health resources would be assessed by determining whether the practice has in-house mental health professionals or refers patients to mental health specialists. This information would be gathered by reviewing practice websites and contacting the practices directly.

Once the data is collected, a scoring system would be developed. The scoring system would assign points to each physician based on the factors discussed above. The factors would be weighted based on their importance in hypertension management. For example, physician-to-patient ratios and the adoption of best practices might be weighted more heavily than telemedicine adoption.

The physicians would then be ranked based on their scores. The highest-scoring physicians would be considered to have the best capacity to manage hypertension effectively. The ranking would be presented in a clear and concise manner, with a brief summary of each physician's strengths and weaknesses.

The analysis would also include a discussion of the overall healthcare landscape in Lewisburg. This would involve identifying any gaps in care and making recommendations for improvement. For example, if the physician-to-patient ratio is high, the analysis might recommend that the area recruit more primary care physicians.

The final analysis would provide a valuable resource for patients seeking primary care physicians in Lewisburg. It would help them make informed decisions about their healthcare and identify physicians who are well-equipped to manage hypertension.

This analysis is intended to be a starting point. It is crucial for patients to do their own research and consult with their healthcare providers to determine the best course of action for their individual needs. The healthcare landscape is constantly evolving, and it is important to stay informed about the latest developments.

For a visual representation of the data and a more interactive way to explore the healthcare landscape in Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, and beyond, we encourage you to explore CartoChrome maps. Their platform offers a powerful tool for visualizing and analyzing geographic data, allowing you to gain a deeper understanding of healthcare accessibility and other critical factors.