17952, Mary D, Pennsylvania Hypertension Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 17952, Mary D, Pennsylvania is 43 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 90.61 percent of the residents in 17952 has some form of health insurance. 38.97 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 72.77 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 17952 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 39 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 17952. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 49 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 894 health care providers accessible to residents in 17952, Mary D, Pennsylvania.

## Hypertension Score Analysis: 17952 Physicians & Mary D Primary Care

Analyzing the landscape of hypertension care within ZIP code 17952, encompassing the Mary D area, requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis assesses the availability and quality of primary care physicians (PCPs), telemedicine adoption, mental health integration, and overall physician-to-patient ratios. The goal is to create a ‘Hypertension Score’ that reflects the ease with which residents can access and manage their hypertension. This score, while not quantifiable here, will be a composite of the factors discussed.

The foundation of effective hypertension management lies in accessible primary care. In Mary D, the availability of PCPs is a crucial starting point. We must investigate the number of practicing PCPs within the 17952 ZIP code. This includes not only general practitioners but also internal medicine specialists, who frequently serve as primary care providers. Further, we need to consider the patient load each physician manages. High patient-to-physician ratios can lead to shorter appointment times, potentially impacting the thoroughness of patient assessments and follow-up care. A low ratio, conversely, suggests greater availability and potentially more personalized care.

A critical component of the ‘Hypertension Score’ involves examining the physician-to-patient ratio. This ratio offers a snapshot of the accessibility of care. Data from the U.S. Census Bureau and the Pennsylvania Department of Health, combined with information from medical directories and insurance provider networks, can help determine this ratio. Ideally, we seek a ratio that allows for sufficient time with each patient. A shortage of PCPs will negatively affect the score, potentially leading to longer wait times for appointments and reduced opportunities for preventative care.

Identifying standout practices is essential. These practices often demonstrate best practices in hypertension management. We need to look for clinics that have implemented evidence-based guidelines, such as those from the American Heart Association (AHA) and the American College of Cardiology (ACC). This includes a focus on regular blood pressure monitoring, lifestyle counseling (diet, exercise, smoking cessation), and appropriate medication management. Electronic health record (EHR) systems that facilitate easy access to patient data and automated reminders for appointments and medication refills are a plus. Practices that actively participate in quality improvement initiatives, such as those aimed at improving blood pressure control rates, will score higher.

Telemedicine adoption is a crucial factor in the 21st century. Telemedicine, including virtual consultations, remote patient monitoring, and digital health tools, offers the potential to improve access to care, especially for patients in rural areas or with mobility limitations. The ‘Hypertension Score’ must assess the extent to which physicians in 17952 utilize telemedicine. This includes evaluating the availability of virtual appointments, the use of remote blood pressure monitoring devices, and the integration of patient portals for communication and medication management. Practices that embrace telemedicine can improve patient convenience, promote adherence to treatment plans, and potentially improve blood pressure control rates.

Hypertension is often co-morbid with mental health conditions. Chronic stress, anxiety, and depression can significantly impact blood pressure control. Therefore, the integration of mental health resources within primary care practices is a vital consideration. The ‘Hypertension Score’ must assess the availability of mental health services, such as on-site therapists, referrals to mental health specialists, and the use of screening tools for depression and anxiety. Practices that prioritize the mental well-being of their patients are better equipped to manage hypertension effectively.

Specific examples of practices within 17952 are difficult to provide without proprietary data. However, we can analyze publicly available information. This would involve reviewing physician profiles on websites like Healthgrades or Zocdoc, examining practice websites, and checking insurance provider directories. Key indicators of a strong practice include board certification in internal medicine or family medicine, positive patient reviews, and a commitment to patient education. The presence of bilingual staff, catering to the diverse population of Mary D, would also be a significant positive factor.

The availability of resources like community health centers and free clinics is also important. These facilities often provide care to underserved populations, including those at higher risk for hypertension. The ‘Hypertension Score’ should account for the presence and accessibility of these resources. Furthermore, we must consider the availability of support groups and educational programs related to hypertension management within the community. These resources can empower patients to take an active role in their health.

Assessing the overall ‘Hypertension Score’ requires a comprehensive understanding of the factors discussed. A high score indicates a robust system of primary care, with readily available physicians, telemedicine integration, mental health resources, and a commitment to evidence-based practices. A low score, conversely, suggests potential challenges in accessing and managing hypertension, such as physician shortages, limited telemedicine adoption, and a lack of mental health integration.

In conclusion, the ‘Hypertension Score’ for the 17952 ZIP code and the Mary D area is determined by a complex interplay of factors. Physician-to-patient ratios, telemedicine adoption, mental health integration, and the presence of standout practices are all critical components. While a specific score cannot be provided here, the analysis highlights the key areas to consider when evaluating the quality and accessibility of hypertension care.

To gain a deeper understanding of the geographic distribution of physicians, patient populations, and healthcare resources within the 17952 ZIP code, and to visualize the data discussed, consider using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can provide a visual representation of the healthcare landscape, enabling a more informed assessment of hypertension care in the Mary D area.