The Provider Score for the Hypertension Score in 18437, Lake Como, Pennsylvania is 34 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 98.11 percent of the residents in 18437 has some form of health insurance. 47.17 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 80.50 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 18437 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 21 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 18437. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 46 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 951 health care providers accessible to residents in 18437, Lake Como, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 18437, Lake Como, Pennsylvania
Hypertension Score | 32 |
---|---|
People Score | 50 |
Provider Score | 34 |
Hospital Score | 57 |
Travel Score | 25 |
18437 | Lake Como | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The task is to provide a comprehensive analysis of hypertension management resources within the ZIP code 18437, focusing on Lake Como, Pennsylvania. This analysis will generate a “Hypertension Score,” a hypothetical metric reflecting the quality and accessibility of care for individuals managing or at risk of hypertension. The score will consider factors like physician availability, telemedicine integration, and mental health support, ultimately informing residents about the resources available to them.
The cornerstone of effective hypertension management is access to a primary care physician. In Lake Como, the physician-to-patient ratio significantly impacts the Hypertension Score. A high ratio, indicating fewer doctors per capita, would negatively affect the score. Conversely, a low ratio, suggesting readily available primary care, would boost it. Data on the exact physician-to-patient ratio requires detailed demographic and physician practice information, which is outside the scope of this response. However, we can speculate on its implications. If the area experiences a shortage of primary care physicians, patients may face longer wait times for appointments, potentially delaying diagnosis and treatment, thereby lowering the Hypertension Score.
The availability of primary care is not solely determined by the number of physicians. The types of practices, their size, and their operational efficiency play crucial roles. Standout practices within the 18437 ZIP code would be those demonstrating a commitment to hypertension management. This includes practices that actively screen patients for hypertension, provide comprehensive patient education, and offer readily accessible follow-up appointments. Practices utilizing electronic health records (EHRs) to track patient data and medication adherence would also be viewed favorably, contributing to a higher Hypertension Score. Furthermore, practices that offer extended hours or weekend appointments would enhance the accessibility of care, especially for working individuals.
Telemedicine has emerged as a vital tool in modern healthcare, and its adoption within the 18437 ZIP code significantly influences the Hypertension Score. Practices that embrace telemedicine, offering virtual consultations, remote blood pressure monitoring, and online patient portals, would receive higher marks. Telemedicine can improve access to care, particularly for patients with mobility issues or those living in remote areas. It can also facilitate more frequent monitoring of blood pressure readings and medication adjustments, leading to better hypertension control. The extent of telemedicine integration, including the availability of virtual visits for follow-up appointments and medication refills, directly impacts the score.
Mental health is inextricably linked to hypertension management. Stress and anxiety can elevate blood pressure, and individuals struggling with mental health issues may find it challenging to adhere to treatment plans. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources within the 18437 ZIP code is a critical factor in the Hypertension Score. Practices that offer on-site mental health services or have established referral pathways to mental health professionals would be considered more supportive of holistic patient care. The presence of community mental health centers or support groups for individuals with hypertension would also positively influence the score.
Evaluating the quality of care also considers patient education. Practices that provide patients with clear, concise information about hypertension, its management, and lifestyle modifications would score higher. This includes providing educational materials, such as brochures, websites, or group classes, to help patients understand their condition and take an active role in their care. The availability of resources in multiple languages would be a significant advantage, reflecting a commitment to serving a diverse patient population.
The Hypertension Score is also affected by the availability of ancillary services. This includes access to diagnostic testing, such as electrocardiograms (ECGs) and blood tests, to monitor for complications of hypertension. Practices that offer these services on-site or have established relationships with local laboratories and imaging centers would be more convenient for patients, improving the overall score. The presence of a pharmacy within a reasonable distance, making medication refills easily accessible, would also contribute positively.
The specific methodologies used by each practice are essential. Practices that adhere to established clinical guidelines for hypertension management, such as those published by the American Heart Association (AHA) and the American College of Cardiology (ACC), would be considered best practices. This includes using standardized protocols for blood pressure measurement, medication management, and lifestyle counseling. The implementation of quality improvement initiatives, such as regular audits of patient outcomes and feedback from patients, would also be viewed favorably.
The overall cost of care is another factor. Practices that offer affordable services, accept a wide range of insurance plans, and provide financial assistance to patients who cannot afford care would be considered more accessible. The availability of generic medications and the ability to offer price transparency would also positively influence the score. The absence of these considerations will lower the score.
The level of patient satisfaction is also a key indicator of quality. Practices that actively solicit feedback from patients, through surveys or other means, and use this feedback to improve their services would be considered patient-centered. Positive patient reviews and testimonials would also contribute to a higher Hypertension Score. The willingness of staff to address patient concerns and provide empathetic care is essential.
In conclusion, the “Hypertension Score” for Lake Como, Pennsylvania (ZIP code 18437), is a multifaceted metric that reflects the quality and accessibility of hypertension management resources. It considers physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health support. The score is also influenced by patient education, the availability of ancillary services, adherence to clinical guidelines, the cost of care, and patient satisfaction. To gain a visual understanding of the distribution of healthcare resources within the 18437 ZIP code and across a broader geographic area, we recommend exploring the interactive maps provided by CartoChrome. These maps can offer valuable insights into the spatial relationships between healthcare providers, patient populations, and other relevant factors, allowing for a more informed assessment of hypertension management resources.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like